Accessibility of sexual and reproductive health services among women with motor disabilities in low- and middle-income countries in Africa: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Firdaous Zekaoui, Houssine Boufettal, Rachid Aboutaieb, Samy Housbane
{"title":"Accessibility of sexual and reproductive health services among women with motor disabilities in low- and middle-income countries in Africa: a systematic review.","authors":"Firdaous Zekaoui, Houssine Boufettal, Rachid Aboutaieb, Samy Housbane","doi":"10.1186/s12978-025-02117-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services is recognized as a fundamental human right and a core priority within global health agendas, particularly under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite significant legal advances such as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities women with motor disabilities continue to face persistent marginalization, especially in low- and middle-income African countries. This systematic review aims to identify the barriers and facilitating factors influencing their access to SRH services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024555816), this review adopted a Population, Concept, Context (PCC) search strategy. Studies published between 2001 and 2024 in English and French were retrieved from major electronic databases and grey literature sources. Data extraction and methodological assessment were conducted independently by multiple reviewers. A narrative synthesis was used for qualitative findings and a descriptive approach for quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies covering eleven African countries were included. The main barriers identified were grouped into five categories: physical and logistical constraints, social and attitudinal barriers, institutional limitations, economic hardships, and informational and communication barriers. Key facilitating factors included healthcare provider training, infrastructure adaptation, community mobilization, and the development of inclusive public health policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the urgent need to embed disability inclusion within national SRH policies and to promote multisectoral strategies that address the systemic inequalities limiting access for women with motor disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02117-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services is recognized as a fundamental human right and a core priority within global health agendas, particularly under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite significant legal advances such as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities women with motor disabilities continue to face persistent marginalization, especially in low- and middle-income African countries. This systematic review aims to identify the barriers and facilitating factors influencing their access to SRH services.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024555816), this review adopted a Population, Concept, Context (PCC) search strategy. Studies published between 2001 and 2024 in English and French were retrieved from major electronic databases and grey literature sources. Data extraction and methodological assessment were conducted independently by multiple reviewers. A narrative synthesis was used for qualitative findings and a descriptive approach for quantitative data.

Results: Twenty-eight studies covering eleven African countries were included. The main barriers identified were grouped into five categories: physical and logistical constraints, social and attitudinal barriers, institutional limitations, economic hardships, and informational and communication barriers. Key facilitating factors included healthcare provider training, infrastructure adaptation, community mobilization, and the development of inclusive public health policies.

Conclusion: This review highlights the urgent need to embed disability inclusion within national SRH policies and to promote multisectoral strategies that address the systemic inequalities limiting access for women with motor disabilities.

非洲低收入和中等收入国家运动残疾妇女获得性健康和生殖健康服务的情况:系统审查。
背景:获得性健康和生殖健康(性健康和生殖健康)服务被认为是一项基本人权,也是全球卫生议程,特别是在可持续发展目标下的核心优先事项。尽管《残疾人权利公约》等法律方面取得了重大进展,但有运动障碍的妇女继续面临持续的边缘化,特别是在低收入和中等收入的非洲国家。这项系统审查旨在确定影响她们获得性健康和生殖健康服务的障碍和促进因素。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA指南并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024555816),采用人口、概念、背景(PCC)检索策略。从主要的电子数据库和灰色文献来源中检索了2001年至2024年间以英语和法语发表的研究。数据提取和方法学评估由多位审稿人独立进行。定性结果采用叙述性综合,定量数据采用描述性方法。结果:纳入了涵盖11个非洲国家的28项研究。确定的主要障碍分为五类:物质和后勤限制、社会和态度障碍、制度限制、经济困难以及信息和沟通障碍。关键的促进因素包括医疗保健提供者培训、基础设施适应、社区动员和制定包容性公共卫生政策。结论:本综述强调了将残疾包容纳入国家性健康和生殖健康政策的迫切需要,并促进多部门战略,解决限制运动残疾妇女获得服务的系统性不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信