Cerebral oxygenation when ventilated or spontaneously breathing: a randomised control trial.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Andrew J D Cameron, Adam W Durrant, Dug Yeo Han, David Choi, Jennifer C Stephens, Nicholas J Lightfoot
{"title":"Cerebral oxygenation when ventilated or spontaneously breathing: a randomised control trial.","authors":"Andrew J D Cameron, Adam W Durrant, Dug Yeo Han, David Choi, Jennifer C Stephens, Nicholas J Lightfoot","doi":"10.1186/s13741-025-00584-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral oxygenation is an important area of concern during shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. Although infrequent, patients may experience serious morbidity or mortality secondary to the cerebral ischaemia which may follow cerebral desaturation. There is no published randomised control trial studying the effect of spontaneous ventilation vs intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) on cerebral oximetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomised 40 patients (20 in each treatment group) undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery to either breathe spontaneously or receive IPPV during their surgery. Other elements of anaesthetic care were standardised. We recorded a baseline measure of cerebral oxygen saturation immediately prior to induction of anaesthesia for each cerebral hemisphere. We measured cerebral oxygenation throughout the intraoperative period, but the treating anaesthetist was blinded to this data. The primary outcome was time-averaged change in cerebral oxygenation during the intraoperative period. The secondary outcome was the incidence of cerebral desaturation events, defined as a ≥ 20% fall below baseline, or an absolute value of 55% or less.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected and analysed data on all 40 patients. The intraoperative increase in cerebral oximetry (mean, sd) for the left and right cerebral hemispheres was 10.5 (7.62) and 12.6 (6.24) for spontaneously breathing patients and 12.9 (7.65) and 11.0 (6.49) for IPPV patients (p = 0.332 and p = 0.427 respectively). There were three cerebral desaturation events in spontaneously breathing patients and eight in ventilated patients (p = 0.155).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ventilatory strategy (IPPV vs spontaneous ventilation) did not have a statistically significant impact on cerebral oxygenation in this study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was retrospectively registered on 10/2/2023 with the ANZCTR. TRN ACTRN12623000143628.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00584-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral oxygenation is an important area of concern during shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. Although infrequent, patients may experience serious morbidity or mortality secondary to the cerebral ischaemia which may follow cerebral desaturation. There is no published randomised control trial studying the effect of spontaneous ventilation vs intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) on cerebral oximetry.

Methods: We randomised 40 patients (20 in each treatment group) undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery to either breathe spontaneously or receive IPPV during their surgery. Other elements of anaesthetic care were standardised. We recorded a baseline measure of cerebral oxygen saturation immediately prior to induction of anaesthesia for each cerebral hemisphere. We measured cerebral oxygenation throughout the intraoperative period, but the treating anaesthetist was blinded to this data. The primary outcome was time-averaged change in cerebral oxygenation during the intraoperative period. The secondary outcome was the incidence of cerebral desaturation events, defined as a ≥ 20% fall below baseline, or an absolute value of 55% or less.

Results: We collected and analysed data on all 40 patients. The intraoperative increase in cerebral oximetry (mean, sd) for the left and right cerebral hemispheres was 10.5 (7.62) and 12.6 (6.24) for spontaneously breathing patients and 12.9 (7.65) and 11.0 (6.49) for IPPV patients (p = 0.332 and p = 0.427 respectively). There were three cerebral desaturation events in spontaneously breathing patients and eight in ventilated patients (p = 0.155).

Conclusions: Ventilatory strategy (IPPV vs spontaneous ventilation) did not have a statistically significant impact on cerebral oxygenation in this study.

Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered on 10/2/2023 with the ANZCTR. TRN ACTRN12623000143628.

通气或自发呼吸时的脑氧合:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在沙滩椅姿势的肩部手术中,脑氧合是一个重要的关注领域。虽然不常见,但患者可能会经历继发于脑缺血的严重发病率或死亡率,这可能会导致脑去饱和。目前还没有发表的随机对照试验研究自发通气与间歇正压通气(IPPV)对脑氧饱和度的影响。方法:我们随机选择40例患者(每个治疗组20例)接受关节镜肩关节手术,在手术期间进行自主呼吸或接受IPPV。麻醉护理的其他要素标准化。在诱导麻醉前,我们记录了每个大脑半球脑氧饱和度的基线测量。我们在整个术中测量了脑氧合,但治疗麻醉师对这些数据是盲目的。主要结果是术中脑氧合的时间平均变化。次要终点是脑去饱和事件的发生率,定义为低于基线≥20%,或绝对值小于或等于55%。结果:我们收集并分析了所有40例患者的数据。自发呼吸患者术中左右脑氧饱和度(sd)分别升高10.5(7.62)和12.6 (6.24),IPPV患者术中脑氧饱和度(sd)分别升高12.9(7.65)和11.0 (6.49)(p = 0.332和p = 0.427)。自发呼吸组发生3次脑去饱和事件,通气组发生8次(p = 0.155)。结论:在本研究中,通气策略(IPPV vs自发通气)对脑氧合没有统计学意义上的显著影响。试验注册:该试验于2023年10月2日在ANZCTR回顾性注册。TRN ACTRN12623000143628。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信