{"title":"Stroke impairs the proactive control of dynamic balance during predictable treadmill accelerations.","authors":"Tara Cornwell, James Finley","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2025.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We maintain balance during gait using both proactive and reactive control strategies. Damage to the brain from a stroke impairs reactive balance, but little is known about how a stroke impacts proactive control during walking. Stroke-related impairments to proactive control could become targets for interventions designed to improve responses to predictable disturbances and reduce fall risk. Therefore, we determined whether proactive strategies during predictable treadmill accelerations differed between people post-stroke (<i>n</i> = 14) and people without stroke (<i>n</i> = 14). Both groups walked with accelerations at random (every one to five strides) and regular (every three strides) intervals. We quantified the effects of the perturbations as changes to the centre of mass (COM) speed and used mechanical leg work to quantify the proactive strategies to slow the COM. Participants without stroke reduced peak COM speed better than those with stroke when perturbations were regular (-0.016 m s<sup>-1</sup> versus +0.004 m s<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.007). They also reduced positive leg work more during the perturbation step than the group post-stroke (-5.7% versus +2.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). One implication of these findings is that people post-stroke may be more susceptible to falls during predictable gait disturbances, and future work should identify the underlying impairments that cause these deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"22 231","pages":"20250336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2025.0336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We maintain balance during gait using both proactive and reactive control strategies. Damage to the brain from a stroke impairs reactive balance, but little is known about how a stroke impacts proactive control during walking. Stroke-related impairments to proactive control could become targets for interventions designed to improve responses to predictable disturbances and reduce fall risk. Therefore, we determined whether proactive strategies during predictable treadmill accelerations differed between people post-stroke (n = 14) and people without stroke (n = 14). Both groups walked with accelerations at random (every one to five strides) and regular (every three strides) intervals. We quantified the effects of the perturbations as changes to the centre of mass (COM) speed and used mechanical leg work to quantify the proactive strategies to slow the COM. Participants without stroke reduced peak COM speed better than those with stroke when perturbations were regular (-0.016 m s-1 versus +0.004 m s-1; p = 0.007). They also reduced positive leg work more during the perturbation step than the group post-stroke (-5.7% versus +2.5%; p = 0.003). One implication of these findings is that people post-stroke may be more susceptible to falls during predictable gait disturbances, and future work should identify the underlying impairments that cause these deficits.
我们使用主动和被动控制策略来保持步态平衡。中风对大脑的损害会损害反应性平衡,但人们对中风如何影响行走时的主动控制知之甚少。主动控制的中风相关损伤可能成为干预的目标,旨在改善对可预测干扰的反应并降低跌倒风险。因此,我们确定在可预测的跑步机加速过程中,中风后患者(n = 14)和未中风患者(n = 14)的主动策略是否存在差异。两组人都以随机(每一到五步)和有规律(每三步)的间隔加速行走。我们将扰动的影响量化为质心(COM)速度的变化,并使用机械腿功来量化减缓质心的主动策略。无脑卒中的参与者比有脑卒中的参与者在常规扰动下降低峰值COM速度更好(-0.016 m s-1 vs +0.004 m s-1; p = 0.007)。与中风后组相比,他们在干扰阶段减少了更多的积极腿部工作(-5.7% vs +2.5%; p = 0.003)。这些发现的一个含义是,中风后的人在可预测的步态障碍期间可能更容易跌倒,未来的工作应该确定导致这些缺陷的潜在损伤。
期刊介绍:
J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.