Véronique Desbeaumes Jodoin , Emma Bousseau , François Trottier-Duclos , André Do , Nicolas Garel , Laurent Elkrief , Paul Lespérance , Jean-Philippe Miron
{"title":"Stepwise interventional psychiatry approach for major depression: A case series","authors":"Véronique Desbeaumes Jodoin , Emma Bousseau , François Trottier-Duclos , André Do , Nicolas Garel , Laurent Elkrief , Paul Lespérance , Jean-Philippe Miron","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.09.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Many patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) require multiple interventions to achieve symptom relief. We explored outcomes from a stepwise, real-world protocol combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and intravenous ketamine.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-eight adults with major depressive disorder were initially treated with a 50-session spaced tDCS protocol. Non-responders were sequentially offered rTMS (30 sessions of iTBS), followed by intravenous racemic ketamine (6 infusions) if needed. Response was defined as ≥50 % reduction in MADRS scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following tDCS, 46.4 % (13/28) of patients achieved response and 32.1 % achieved remission. Of 11 patients who proceeded to rTMS, 36.4 % (4/11) responded. Among the four who received ketamine, 50 % (2/4) responded. The cumulative response and remission rates were 67.9 % and 53.6 %, respectively. Exploratory analyses revealed no significant baseline differences between responders and non-responders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This case series suggests that a sequential neuromodulation strategy may increase overall response rates in TRD by capturing different responder profiles across modalities. These findings support the feasibility of a pragmatic stepwise approach and highlight the need for controlled studies to guide personalized sequencing strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Pages 177-179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625005837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Many patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) require multiple interventions to achieve symptom relief. We explored outcomes from a stepwise, real-world protocol combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and intravenous ketamine.
Methods
Twenty-eight adults with major depressive disorder were initially treated with a 50-session spaced tDCS protocol. Non-responders were sequentially offered rTMS (30 sessions of iTBS), followed by intravenous racemic ketamine (6 infusions) if needed. Response was defined as ≥50 % reduction in MADRS scores.
Results
Following tDCS, 46.4 % (13/28) of patients achieved response and 32.1 % achieved remission. Of 11 patients who proceeded to rTMS, 36.4 % (4/11) responded. Among the four who received ketamine, 50 % (2/4) responded. The cumulative response and remission rates were 67.9 % and 53.6 %, respectively. Exploratory analyses revealed no significant baseline differences between responders and non-responders.
Conclusions
This case series suggests that a sequential neuromodulation strategy may increase overall response rates in TRD by capturing different responder profiles across modalities. These findings support the feasibility of a pragmatic stepwise approach and highlight the need for controlled studies to guide personalized sequencing strategies.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;