Data-driven subtypes of subjective cognitive decline: neuropsychological profiles, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, and clinical trajectories.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Salvatore Mazzeo, Sara Boveri, Elisa Bortolin, Giulia Bruschi, Emanuele Girani, Alessandro Bombaci, Federico Emanuele Pozzi, Maria Vittoria Corbari, Federico Ambrogi, Federica Agosta, Massimo Filippi, Maria Salsone
{"title":"Data-driven subtypes of subjective cognitive decline: neuropsychological profiles, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, and clinical trajectories.","authors":"Salvatore Mazzeo, Sara Boveri, Elisa Bortolin, Giulia Bruschi, Emanuele Girani, Alessandro Bombaci, Federico Emanuele Pozzi, Maria Vittoria Corbari, Federico Ambrogi, Federica Agosta, Massimo Filippi, Maria Salsone","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13418-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is a heterogeneous condition recognized as the earliest manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We hypothesized that the heterogeneity of SCD may be synthesized in distinct subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. For all participants, demographic variables, cognitive measures, APOE genotype, CSF biomarkers, brain MRI, and FDG-PET data were available. Participants underwent follow-up visits every 6 or 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>542 cognitively normal (CN), 346 SCD, and 423 early mild cognitive impairment (E-MCI) individuals were included. A data-driven approach based on cognitive measures identified three SCD clusters (k1, k2, k3) that performed differently in verbal memory (k2 outperformed all the groups and k3 showed the poorest performance, p < 0.001) and in executive function (k1 had the lowest scores, p = 0.006). Regarding CSF biomarkers, k2 exhibited lower p-tau (20.6 ± 9.2 vs. 24.2 ± 13.6, p = 0.03) and k3 had higher Aβ<sub>42</sub> levels (1131.3 ± 379.8 vs. 942.87 ± 355.3, p = 0.01) compared to the E-MCI group, while there were no differences between k1 and E-MCI. Regarding brain FDG-PET, k1 demonstrated reduced uptake compared to CN, k2, and k3 (p < 0.001). During follow-up, k1 exhibited a higher rate of progression to MCI or dementia compared to k2 and k3 (Log-rank χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.18, p = 0.0002) and a steeper decline in general cognition and long-term verbal memory compared to k2.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We proposed a three-subgroup system classification for SCD, reflecting different cognitive profiles and longitudinal trajectories. Classifying individuals with SCD may enhance diagnostic pathways and inform personalized interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 10","pages":"669"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13418-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is a heterogeneous condition recognized as the earliest manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We hypothesized that the heterogeneity of SCD may be synthesized in distinct subtypes.

Methods: We analyzed data from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. For all participants, demographic variables, cognitive measures, APOE genotype, CSF biomarkers, brain MRI, and FDG-PET data were available. Participants underwent follow-up visits every 6 or 12 months.

Results: 542 cognitively normal (CN), 346 SCD, and 423 early mild cognitive impairment (E-MCI) individuals were included. A data-driven approach based on cognitive measures identified three SCD clusters (k1, k2, k3) that performed differently in verbal memory (k2 outperformed all the groups and k3 showed the poorest performance, p < 0.001) and in executive function (k1 had the lowest scores, p = 0.006). Regarding CSF biomarkers, k2 exhibited lower p-tau (20.6 ± 9.2 vs. 24.2 ± 13.6, p = 0.03) and k3 had higher Aβ42 levels (1131.3 ± 379.8 vs. 942.87 ± 355.3, p = 0.01) compared to the E-MCI group, while there were no differences between k1 and E-MCI. Regarding brain FDG-PET, k1 demonstrated reduced uptake compared to CN, k2, and k3 (p < 0.001). During follow-up, k1 exhibited a higher rate of progression to MCI or dementia compared to k2 and k3 (Log-rank χ2 = 18.18, p = 0.0002) and a steeper decline in general cognition and long-term verbal memory compared to k2.

Interpretation: We proposed a three-subgroup system classification for SCD, reflecting different cognitive profiles and longitudinal trajectories. Classifying individuals with SCD may enhance diagnostic pathways and inform personalized interventions.

数据驱动的主观认知衰退亚型:神经心理学概况、阿尔茨海默病生物标志物和临床轨迹。
目的:主观认知能力下降(SCD)是一种异质性疾病,被认为是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的最早表现。我们假设SCD的异质性可能是在不同的亚型中合成的。方法:我们分析来自AD神经影像学倡议(ADNI)数据库的数据。对于所有参与者,人口统计学变量、认知测量、APOE基因型、CSF生物标志物、脑MRI和FDG-PET数据都是可用的。参与者每6个月或12个月进行一次随访。结果:542例认知正常(CN), 346例SCD, 423例早期轻度认知障碍(E-MCI)。基于认知测量的数据驱动方法发现,与E-MCI组相比,三个SCD集群(k1, k2, k3)在言语记忆方面表现不同(k2优于所有组,k3表现最差,p = 0.01),而k1和E-MCI组之间没有差异。关于脑FDG-PET,与CN、k2和k3相比,k1的摄取减少(p = 18.18, p = 0.0002),与k2相比,一般认知和长期言语记忆的下降幅度更大。我们提出了SCD的三亚群系统分类,反映了不同的认知概况和纵向轨迹。对SCD患者进行分类可以增强诊断途径,并为个性化干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信