Microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with diuretic-resistant ascites.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_11_2025
Sawyer Blair, Jack Newcomer, Driss Raissi
{"title":"Microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with diuretic-resistant ascites.","authors":"Sawyer Blair, Jack Newcomer, Driss Raissi","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_11_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions in patients with pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites. There is logical hesitation among clinicians to pursue MWA in these decompensated patients for fear of worsening an already bleak prognosis, but there is limited evidence to justify this behavior.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of HCC treated with percutaneous MWA at a single center was performed. 18 patients who underwent CT-guided MWA with pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites were identified. A control group of 29 patients who underwent CT-guided MWA without pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites was identified, which was further narrowed to 18 patients after matching by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score and age. The effectiveness of treatment was compared between the two groups and evaluated by disease-free survival, residual disease, and overall survival over 36 months. Kaplan-Meier curves plotting the survival function were constructed to compare these variables in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MWA was successfully performed in all patients. The probability of survival at 1 year for the ascites and matched control groups were 0.778 and 1.00, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.038). The probability of survival at 3 years for the ascites and matched control groups were 0.556 and 0.630, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.237). There were no significant differences between residual disease and disease-free survival between the two groups at 1 or 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-guided percutaneous MWA for HCC in select patients with pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"15 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_11_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions in patients with pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites. There is logical hesitation among clinicians to pursue MWA in these decompensated patients for fear of worsening an already bleak prognosis, but there is limited evidence to justify this behavior.

Material and methods: A retrospective review of HCC treated with percutaneous MWA at a single center was performed. 18 patients who underwent CT-guided MWA with pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites were identified. A control group of 29 patients who underwent CT-guided MWA without pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites was identified, which was further narrowed to 18 patients after matching by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score and age. The effectiveness of treatment was compared between the two groups and evaluated by disease-free survival, residual disease, and overall survival over 36 months. Kaplan-Meier curves plotting the survival function were constructed to compare these variables in both groups.

Results: MWA was successfully performed in all patients. The probability of survival at 1 year for the ascites and matched control groups were 0.778 and 1.00, respectively (P = 0.038). The probability of survival at 3 years for the ascites and matched control groups were 0.556 and 0.630, respectively (P = 0.237). There were no significant differences between residual disease and disease-free survival between the two groups at 1 or 3 years.

Conclusion: CT-guided percutaneous MWA for HCC in select patients with pre-existing diuretic-resistant ascites is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option.

微波消融术治疗肝硬化伴利尿抵抗性腹水的肝癌患者。
目的:本研究的目的是评估计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下经皮微波消融(MWA)治疗已存在利尿抵抗性腹水的肝细胞癌(HCC)病变的可行性、安全性和有效性。临床医生在对这些失代偿患者进行MWA治疗时存在逻辑上的犹豫,因为担心会使已经暗淡的预后恶化,但证明这种行为的证据有限。材料和方法:对单中心经皮MWA治疗HCC的病例进行回顾性分析。18例行ct引导MWA的患者已存在利尿抵抗性腹水。对照组为29例ct引导下无利尿剂耐药腹水的MWA患者,经终末期肝病模型钠评分和年龄匹配后进一步缩小至18例。比较两组的治疗效果,并通过36个月的无病生存期、残留疾病和总生存期来评估。绘制生存函数的Kaplan-Meier曲线来比较两组的这些变量。结果:所有患者均成功行MWA手术。腹水组和对照组1年生存率分别为0.778和1.00,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.038)。腹水组和匹配对照组3年生存率分别为0.556和0.630 (P = 0.237)。两组患者1年或3年的残留病和无病生存率无显著差异。结论:ct引导下经皮肝细胞癌MWA治疗已存在利尿抵抗性腹水的患者是一种可行、安全、有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信