Current State of Patient Blood Management in Cardiovascular Surgery: Insights from a Survey of Leading Centers.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson
{"title":"Current State of Patient Blood Management in Cardiovascular Surgery: Insights from a Survey of Leading Centers.","authors":"Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.

Design: A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.

Setting: Cardiac surgery centers.

Intervention: None.

Participants: The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.

Measurements and main results: Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.

Conclusions: Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.

心血管外科患者血液管理现状:来自领先中心调查的见解。
目的:了解美国主要心脏外科中心的患者血液管理(PBM)实践状况。设计:部署了一个解决PBM程序结构和PBM程序操作的调查工具。调查还纳入了管理某些情况的实践。工作地点:心脏外科中心。干预:没有。参与者:2024年美国新闻与世界报道前25名心脏手术中心。测量和主要结果:只有29%的站点有全职的PBM。各网站的知情同意方式各不相同。大多数医院(54%)在整个住院期间获得知情同意。21%的医院同意非紧急输血。入院前贫血筛查在29%的地点部署超过2周。虽然许多与血液保护相关的麻醉技术被大多数使用(例如,急性等容血液稀释92%,逆行自体启动95%),但仅在43%的部位提供简单的步骤,如根据患者大小调整心肺(CPB)回路。结论:在许多被调查的项目中没有发现设计良好的PBM项目的关键特征。这项审计表明,在心血管外科项目中,PBM有机会增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信