Expanded Results from a Dedicated Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic.

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Laura P Cohen, Charlotte Paquette, Michelle Vassilopoulos, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Lana Tsao, Safia Chatur, Claire Lin, Aferdita Spahillari, Yuxi Liu, James L Januzzi
{"title":"Expanded Results from a Dedicated Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic.","authors":"Laura P Cohen, Charlotte Paquette, Michelle Vassilopoulos, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Lana Tsao, Safia Chatur, Claire Lin, Aferdita Spahillari, Yuxi Liu, James L Januzzi","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) care in general cardiology environments is suboptimal. A dedicated GDMT clinic was expanded to include individuals with HF across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Referred individuals were seen by advanced practice providers until maximally tolerated therapy was achieved. Achievement of optimal GDMT was evaluated and compared to patients from usual care matched in a 1:2 fashion. Key prognostic HF indicators were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age of 92 GDMT-eligible clinic participants was 66.5 (15.4) years, 25 (27.2%) were female;18 (19.6%) had LVEF ≥50%. From baseline to follow-up visit (12.9 weeks), the number of patients eligible for optimal GDMT with LVEF <50% increased from 12.0% to 91.3% (p<0.001); among eligible individuals with LVEF ≥50%, optimal GDMT increased from 5.6% to 77.8% (p=0.001). There was an increase in the proportion on optimal GDMT at ≥50% target dose (1.1% to 50.0%) and at target dose (0.0% to 30.4%). These changes were substantially greater than in the matched cohort of usual care patients. Among GDMT patients, significant improvements were observed in symptoms, NT-proBNP and important echocardiographic measurements. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall and Clinical Summary Scores both significantly increased by 8 points (p=0.01) and 6-minute walk distance increased by 37 meters (p=0.03). GDMT administration was safe and well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful implementation of GDMT in a dedicated clinic embedded within a general cardiology practice was well-tolerated and effective to improve key outcomes across the entire spectrum of LVEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.09.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementation of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) care in general cardiology environments is suboptimal. A dedicated GDMT clinic was expanded to include individuals with HF across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods: Referred individuals were seen by advanced practice providers until maximally tolerated therapy was achieved. Achievement of optimal GDMT was evaluated and compared to patients from usual care matched in a 1:2 fashion. Key prognostic HF indicators were assessed.

Results: The mean (SD) age of 92 GDMT-eligible clinic participants was 66.5 (15.4) years, 25 (27.2%) were female;18 (19.6%) had LVEF ≥50%. From baseline to follow-up visit (12.9 weeks), the number of patients eligible for optimal GDMT with LVEF <50% increased from 12.0% to 91.3% (p<0.001); among eligible individuals with LVEF ≥50%, optimal GDMT increased from 5.6% to 77.8% (p=0.001). There was an increase in the proportion on optimal GDMT at ≥50% target dose (1.1% to 50.0%) and at target dose (0.0% to 30.4%). These changes were substantially greater than in the matched cohort of usual care patients. Among GDMT patients, significant improvements were observed in symptoms, NT-proBNP and important echocardiographic measurements. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall and Clinical Summary Scores both significantly increased by 8 points (p=0.01) and 6-minute walk distance increased by 37 meters (p=0.03). GDMT administration was safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions: Successful implementation of GDMT in a dedicated clinic embedded within a general cardiology practice was well-tolerated and effective to improve key outcomes across the entire spectrum of LVEF.

一个专门的指导医学治疗诊所的扩展结果。
背景:在普通心脏病学环境中,心力衰竭(HF)护理的指导药物治疗(GDMT)的实施是不理想的。专门的GDMT诊所扩大到包括左室射血分数(LVEF)全谱HF患者。方法:转介个体由高级实践提供者看到,直到最大耐受治疗实现。评估最佳GDMT的实现情况,并以1:2的比例与常规护理患者进行比较。评估关键的心衰预后指标。结果:92例符合gdmt条件的临床参与者的平均(SD)年龄为66.5(15.4)岁,其中25例(27.2%)为女性;LVEF≥50% 18例(19.6%)。从基线到随访(12.9周),符合最佳GDMT治疗条件的LVEF患者数量。结论:在普通心脏病学实践中,在专门的诊所成功实施GDMT,耐受性良好,可有效改善整个LVEF范围内的关键结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信