The Risk of Chronic Opioid Utilization with Tramadol: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Eric P Borrelli
{"title":"The Risk of Chronic Opioid Utilization with Tramadol: A Narrative Review of the Literature.","authors":"Eric P Borrelli","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2562033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tramadol is a prescription opioid analgesic which was first approved in the U.S. in 1995. Tramadol was not a controlled substance on the federal level until August 2014 when it was classified as a Schedule-IV controlled substance. Even with it becoming a controlled substance, its utilization increased in the following years and is the second most prescribed opioid in the U.S. behind hydrocodone products. Recent research highlights tramadol's potential for psychological or physical dependence. Therefore, the objective of this article was to review all studies assessing the impact of tramadol on chronic opioid utilization and/or opioid misuse compared to other therapies. Ten published studies showed tramadol had comparable or higher risk of chronic opioid utilization and/or opioid misuse compared to other opioids, while six studies showed tramadol had a significantly lower risk. This article intends to review these findings, providing rationale and potential policy implications. While there may be some residual confounding, confounding by indication, or unmeasured biases contributing to the results seen showing higher risks, it is still concerning given the number of studies that demonstrated these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2562033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tramadol is a prescription opioid analgesic which was first approved in the U.S. in 1995. Tramadol was not a controlled substance on the federal level until August 2014 when it was classified as a Schedule-IV controlled substance. Even with it becoming a controlled substance, its utilization increased in the following years and is the second most prescribed opioid in the U.S. behind hydrocodone products. Recent research highlights tramadol's potential for psychological or physical dependence. Therefore, the objective of this article was to review all studies assessing the impact of tramadol on chronic opioid utilization and/or opioid misuse compared to other therapies. Ten published studies showed tramadol had comparable or higher risk of chronic opioid utilization and/or opioid misuse compared to other opioids, while six studies showed tramadol had a significantly lower risk. This article intends to review these findings, providing rationale and potential policy implications. While there may be some residual confounding, confounding by indication, or unmeasured biases contributing to the results seen showing higher risks, it is still concerning given the number of studies that demonstrated these findings.

曲马多慢性阿片类药物使用的风险:文献综述。
曲马多是一种处方阿片类镇痛药,于1995年首次在美国获得批准。曲马多在2014年8月被列为附表iv管制物质之前,并不是联邦一级的管制物质。即使它成为一种受管制的物质,它的使用率在接下来的几年里也有所增加,是美国仅次于氢可酮产品的第二大处方阿片类药物。最近的研究强调了曲马多潜在的心理或生理依赖。因此,本文的目的是回顾与其他治疗相比,曲马多对慢性阿片类药物使用和/或阿片类药物滥用影响的所有研究。10项已发表的研究表明,与其他阿片类药物相比,曲马多慢性阿片类药物使用和/或阿片类药物滥用的风险相当或更高,而6项研究表明曲马多的风险明显较低。本文旨在回顾这些发现,提供基本原理和潜在的政策含义。虽然可能存在一些残留的混杂因素、指征混杂因素或未测量的偏差,导致结果显示出更高的风险,但考虑到证明这些发现的研究数量,这仍然令人担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信