The legality of weight discrimination in Canada: an environmental scan of case law and the limits of Canadian legislation.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah Nutter, Rachel Waugh, Erin McEachran, Ashley Toor, Jacob Shelley, Angela S Alberga, Mary Forhan, Sara Fl Kirk, Taniya S Nagpal, Ian Patton, Ximena Ramos Salas, Shelly Russell-Mayhew
{"title":"The legality of weight discrimination in Canada: an environmental scan of case law and the limits of Canadian legislation.","authors":"Sarah Nutter, Rachel Waugh, Erin McEachran, Ashley Toor, Jacob Shelley, Angela S Alberga, Mary Forhan, Sara Fl Kirk, Taniya S Nagpal, Ian Patton, Ximena Ramos Salas, Shelly Russell-Mayhew","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02606-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Weight stigma negatively impacts people with higher weights across the lifespan as well as social contexts and can lead to weight discrimination. As weight is not a protected identity in Canadian human rights legislation, it is important to better understand how weight discrimination is being argued in Canada's legal system. The purpose of this environmental scan was to examine and describe Canadian case law and scholarly articles pertaining to the argumentation of weight discrimination in Canada. A three-step search process was taken to identify relevant cases and articles that included; (1) Boolean keyword searches in HeinOnline, WestLaw, and LexisPlus; (2) citation searching within all results that met inclusion criteria; and (3) a keyword search in CanLII. These searches yielded a total of 33 documents that were included for analysis, including 8 scholarly articles and 25 cases. Scholarly articles highlighted consistent criticisms of existing human rights protections for higher-weight people in Canada, mostly pertaining to Limitations of disability protections. Of the 25 cases included, 16 were unsuccessful and 9 were successful, with most cases related to employment (n = 19). Our findings point to significant gaps in Canada's legal system for identifying and correcting instances of weight discrimination. Current Canadian disability protections are inadequate for those who experience weight discrimination, especially those who do not experience disability due to their weight. Our results highlight that weight ought to be a bona fide human rights issue, independent from disability protections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02606-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weight stigma negatively impacts people with higher weights across the lifespan as well as social contexts and can lead to weight discrimination. As weight is not a protected identity in Canadian human rights legislation, it is important to better understand how weight discrimination is being argued in Canada's legal system. The purpose of this environmental scan was to examine and describe Canadian case law and scholarly articles pertaining to the argumentation of weight discrimination in Canada. A three-step search process was taken to identify relevant cases and articles that included; (1) Boolean keyword searches in HeinOnline, WestLaw, and LexisPlus; (2) citation searching within all results that met inclusion criteria; and (3) a keyword search in CanLII. These searches yielded a total of 33 documents that were included for analysis, including 8 scholarly articles and 25 cases. Scholarly articles highlighted consistent criticisms of existing human rights protections for higher-weight people in Canada, mostly pertaining to Limitations of disability protections. Of the 25 cases included, 16 were unsuccessful and 9 were successful, with most cases related to employment (n = 19). Our findings point to significant gaps in Canada's legal system for identifying and correcting instances of weight discrimination. Current Canadian disability protections are inadequate for those who experience weight discrimination, especially those who do not experience disability due to their weight. Our results highlight that weight ought to be a bona fide human rights issue, independent from disability protections.

加拿大体重歧视的合法性:判例法的环境扫描和加拿大立法的限制。
体重耻辱会对体重较高的人的一生以及社会环境产生负面影响,并可能导致体重歧视。由于体重在加拿大的人权立法中不是受保护的身份,因此更好地了解加拿大法律体系中体重歧视的争论是很重要的。这次环境扫描的目的是检查和描述加拿大的判例法和学术文章有关加拿大体重歧视的论点。采取了三步搜索过程,以确定包括以下内容的相关案例和文章;(1)在HeinOnline、WestLaw和LexisPlus中进行布尔关键字搜索;(2)在所有符合纳入标准的结果中进行引文检索;(3)在CanLII中进行关键字搜索。这些搜索总共产生了33份文件,其中包括8篇学术文章和25个案例。学术文章强调了对加拿大现有的对体重较高人群的人权保护的一贯批评,主要涉及残疾保护的限制。在纳入的25例中,16例不成功,9例成功,大多数与就业有关(n = 19)。我们的研究结果表明,加拿大的法律体系在识别和纠正体重歧视方面存在重大差距。目前加拿大的残疾保护措施对那些遭受体重歧视的人来说是不够的,尤其是那些没有因为体重而遭受残疾的人。我们的研究结果强调,体重应该是一个真正的人权问题,独立于残疾保护之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信