Assessing glenoid orientation on the axillary view: a novel technique using the posterolateral acromion-to-coracoid line.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Michael Hachadorian, Mihir Sheth, Ermyas Kahsai, Anastasia Whitson, Corey Schiffman, Frederick Matsen, Jason Hsu
{"title":"Assessing glenoid orientation on the axillary view: a novel technique using the posterolateral acromion-to-coracoid line.","authors":"Michael Hachadorian, Mihir Sheth, Ermyas Kahsai, Anastasia Whitson, Corey Schiffman, Frederick Matsen, Jason Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06661-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In shoulder arthroplasty, three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) has become the gold standard for preoperative version assessment. Meanwhile, postoperative version is usually evaluated using radiographs (XR), in particular an axillary view, in which the view of the scapular body is often truncated, preventing the scapular plane from being used as a reference. This study introduces the posterolateral acromion-to-coracoid (PLAC) line, which can be assessed on a standard truncated axillary radiograph.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-six shoulders were studied. Four angles were measured including 3D CT (CT Version), 3D CT PLAC line to glenoid face angle (CT PLAC-GFA), 2) radiographic PLAC line to glenoid face angle (XR PLAC-GFA), and 3) the radiographic glenoid vault line to glenoid face angle (XR GV-GFA). Variation and linear relationship between these angles were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference between CT PLAC-GFA and XR PLAC-GFA was 1.0º (95% CI -0.7 to 2.8)(IQR = 8.5º, -3.0º to 5.4º), with a strong correlation on linear regression (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76, p < 0.001). XR PLAC-GFA and XR GV-GFA demonstrated strong correlations with CT measured version (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72 and 0.70, respectively; p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all metrics (ICC ≥ 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PLAC and the glenoid vault lines are highly reproducible references on truncated axillary views. These alternative reference lines allow accurate comparison of preoperative and postoperative glenoid orientation using standard axillary radiographs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06661-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In shoulder arthroplasty, three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) has become the gold standard for preoperative version assessment. Meanwhile, postoperative version is usually evaluated using radiographs (XR), in particular an axillary view, in which the view of the scapular body is often truncated, preventing the scapular plane from being used as a reference. This study introduces the posterolateral acromion-to-coracoid (PLAC) line, which can be assessed on a standard truncated axillary radiograph.

Materials and methods: Forty-six shoulders were studied. Four angles were measured including 3D CT (CT Version), 3D CT PLAC line to glenoid face angle (CT PLAC-GFA), 2) radiographic PLAC line to glenoid face angle (XR PLAC-GFA), and 3) the radiographic glenoid vault line to glenoid face angle (XR GV-GFA). Variation and linear relationship between these angles were calculated.

Results: The mean difference between CT PLAC-GFA and XR PLAC-GFA was 1.0º (95% CI -0.7 to 2.8)(IQR = 8.5º, -3.0º to 5.4º), with a strong correlation on linear regression (R2 = 0.76, p < 0.001). XR PLAC-GFA and XR GV-GFA demonstrated strong correlations with CT measured version (R2 = 0.72 and 0.70, respectively; p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all metrics (ICC ≥ 0.93).

Conclusions: The PLAC and the glenoid vault lines are highly reproducible references on truncated axillary views. These alternative reference lines allow accurate comparison of preoperative and postoperative glenoid orientation using standard axillary radiographs.

腋窝角度评估肩胛盂定位:一种使用肩峰-喙线后外侧的新技术。
目的:在肩关节置换术中,三维计算机断层扫描(3D CT)已成为术前版本评估的金标准。同时,术后版本通常使用x线片(XR)评估,特别是腋窝视图,其中肩胛骨体的视图通常被截断,防止肩胛骨平面被用作参考。本研究介绍了肩峰后外侧至喙突(placc)线,该线可通过标准截短腋窝x线片进行评估。材料和方法:对46个肩关节进行了研究。测量4个角度,包括三维CT (CT Version)、三维CT PLAC线至关节面角(CT placa - gfa)、x线PLAC线至关节面角(XR placa - gfa)、x线关节顶线至关节面角(XR GV-GFA)。计算了这些角度之间的变化和线性关系。结果:CT PLAC- gfa与XR PLAC- gfa的平均差值为1.0º(95% CI为-0.7 ~ 2.8)(IQR = 8.5º,-3.0º~ 5.4º),线性回归相关性强(R2 = 0.76, p 2 = 0.72和0.70);结论:PLAC和肩关节穹窿线是截断腋窝位的高度可重复性参考。这些可供选择的参考线可以通过标准腋窝x线片准确比较术前和术后肩关节位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信