Responses to listening difficulty in in-person conversation: a scoping review of primary evidence.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Lucy Robertson, Graham Naylor
{"title":"Responses to listening difficulty in in-person conversation: a scoping review of primary evidence.","authors":"Lucy Robertson, Graham Naylor","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2558692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Existing evidence regarding the ways in which people with hearing loss respond to listening difficulty in verbal conversation is fragmented. To advance understanding of the experience of listening difficulty in in-person verbal conversation, this review seeks to map the current evidence, focusing on behavioural and affective responses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Articles were identified through systematic searches in five reference databases, and through reference checking. Thematic synthesis was used to collate and condense data into distinct themes and categories.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Literature examining adults' behavioural, and/or affective responses to listening difficulty in in-person conversation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 8503 studies, and 81 were selected for inclusion. Responses from people with hearing loss, people with normal hearing, and communication partners were identified, and were assembled into five themes, each consisting of multiple categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People with hearing loss and their communication partners respond to listening difficulty in conversation in a wide range of ways, covering diverse aspects of communication. People with normal hearing report most of the same response types as people with hearing loss. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of evidence regarding responses of people with normal hearing, indicating a need for more comparative studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2558692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Existing evidence regarding the ways in which people with hearing loss respond to listening difficulty in verbal conversation is fragmented. To advance understanding of the experience of listening difficulty in in-person verbal conversation, this review seeks to map the current evidence, focusing on behavioural and affective responses.

Design: Scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Articles were identified through systematic searches in five reference databases, and through reference checking. Thematic synthesis was used to collate and condense data into distinct themes and categories.

Study sample: Literature examining adults' behavioural, and/or affective responses to listening difficulty in in-person conversation.

Results: The literature search identified 8503 studies, and 81 were selected for inclusion. Responses from people with hearing loss, people with normal hearing, and communication partners were identified, and were assembled into five themes, each consisting of multiple categories.

Conclusion: People with hearing loss and their communication partners respond to listening difficulty in conversation in a wide range of ways, covering diverse aspects of communication. People with normal hearing report most of the same response types as people with hearing loss. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of evidence regarding responses of people with normal hearing, indicating a need for more comparative studies.

对面对面谈话中听力困难的反应:主要证据的范围审查。
目的:关于听力损失患者在口头对话中对听力困难的反应方式的现有证据是碎片化的。为了进一步了解面对面口头对话中听力困难的经历,本综述试图绘制当前的证据,重点关注行为和情感反应。设计:根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。通过系统检索5个参考数据库,并通过参考文献检查来确定文章。专题综合用于整理和浓缩数据到不同的主题和类别。研究样本:研究成人在面对面谈话中对听力困难的行为和/或情感反应的文献。结果:文献检索共发现8503篇研究,其中81篇入选。听力损失者、听力正常者和交流伙伴的回答被确定,并被组合成五个主题,每个主题由多个类别组成。结论:听力损失患者及其交流伙伴在对话中对听力困难的反应方式广泛,涵盖了交流的各个方面。听力正常的人报告的大多数反应类型与听力损失的人相同。然而,缺乏关于听力正常的人的反应的证据,表明需要进行更多的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信