Madeleine K Wyburd, Nicola K Dinsdale, Vanessa Kyriakopoulou, Lorenzo Venturini, Robert Wright, Alena Uus, Jacqueline Matthew, Emily Skelton, Lilla Zöllei, Joseph Hajnal, Ana I L Namburete
{"title":"Cross-Modality Comparison of Fetal Brain Phenotypes: Insights From Short-Interval Second-Trimester MRI and Ultrasound Imaging.","authors":"Madeleine K Wyburd, Nicola K Dinsdale, Vanessa Kyriakopoulou, Lorenzo Venturini, Robert Wright, Alena Uus, Jacqueline Matthew, Emily Skelton, Lilla Zöllei, Joseph Hajnal, Ana I L Namburete","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in fetal three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revolutionized the study of fetal brain development, enabling detailed analysis of brain structures and growth. Despite their complementary capabilities, these modalities capture fundamentally different physical signals, potentially leading to systematic differences in image-derived phenotypes (IDPs). Here, we evaluate the agreement of IDPs between US and MRI by comparing the volumes of eight brain structures from 90 subjects derived using deep-learning algorithms from majority same-day imaging (days between scans: mean = 1.2, mode = 0 and max = 4). Excellent agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient, <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>ICC</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>0.75</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ ICC>0.75 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) was observed for the cerebellum, cavum septum pellucidum, thalamus, white matter and deep grey matter volumes, with significant correlations <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mfenced><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\left(p<0.001\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> for most structures, except the ventricular system. Bland-Altman analysis revealed some systematic biases: intracranial and cortical plate volumes were larger on US than MRI, by an average of <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>35</mn> <mspace></mspace> <msup><mi>cm</mi> <mn>3</mn></msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ 35\\ {\\mathrm{cm}}^3 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>4.1</mn> <mspace></mspace> <msup><mi>cm</mi> <mn>3</mn></msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ 4.1\\ {\\mathrm{cm}}^3 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , respectively. Finally, we found the labels of the brainstem and ventricular system were not comparable between the modalities. These findings highlight the necessity of structure-specific adjustments when interpreting fetal brain IPDs across modalities and underscore the complementary roles of US and MRI in advancing fetal neuroimaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 14","pages":"e70349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advances in fetal three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revolutionized the study of fetal brain development, enabling detailed analysis of brain structures and growth. Despite their complementary capabilities, these modalities capture fundamentally different physical signals, potentially leading to systematic differences in image-derived phenotypes (IDPs). Here, we evaluate the agreement of IDPs between US and MRI by comparing the volumes of eight brain structures from 90 subjects derived using deep-learning algorithms from majority same-day imaging (days between scans: mean = 1.2, mode = 0 and max = 4). Excellent agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient, ) was observed for the cerebellum, cavum septum pellucidum, thalamus, white matter and deep grey matter volumes, with significant correlations for most structures, except the ventricular system. Bland-Altman analysis revealed some systematic biases: intracranial and cortical plate volumes were larger on US than MRI, by an average of and , respectively. Finally, we found the labels of the brainstem and ventricular system were not comparable between the modalities. These findings highlight the necessity of structure-specific adjustments when interpreting fetal brain IPDs across modalities and underscore the complementary roles of US and MRI in advancing fetal neuroimaging.
期刊介绍:
Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged.
Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.