Role of artificial intelligence applied to ultrasound in endometrial cancer: a systematic review.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marianna Ciancia, Francesca Moro, Martina Bertoni, Giulia Baldassari, Pierpaolo Schips, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Antonia Carla Testa
{"title":"Role of artificial intelligence applied to ultrasound in endometrial cancer: a systematic review.","authors":"Marianna Ciancia, Francesca Moro, Martina Bertoni, Giulia Baldassari, Pierpaolo Schips, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Antonia Carla Testa","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in ultrasound imaging for the assessment of endometrial cancer, with a focus on methodological approaches and diagnostic accuracy in predicting different outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception up to January 16, 2025. Studies applying AI to ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and management of endometrial malignant pathology were included. Quality assessment of the retrieved studies was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Artificial Intelligence-Centered Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-AI). The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration record CRD42025648961).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies were included: 18 (60%) distinguished between benign and malignant endometrial lesions, 4 (13.3%) focused on predicting lymph node metastases, 3 (10%) evaluated myometrial invasion, and 2 (6.6%) classified tumor risk. Additionally, 2 studies assessed disease-free survival (6.6%), while another developed a model for the automated identification of endometrial lesions (3.3%). According to QUADAS-AI, most studies were at high risk of bias for subject selection (eg, sample size not specified, imaging preprocessing not performed) (27/30, 90%) and the index test (no external validation) (27/30, 90%) domains, and at low risk of bias for the reference standard (target condition correctly classified by the reference standard) (29/30, 97%) and the workflow (reasonable time between index test and reference standard) (29/30, 97%) domains. Models were externally validated in 3/30 studies (10%), internally cross-validated in 3/30 (10%), internally hold-out validated in 13/30 (43.3%), and not validated in 11/30 (36.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Published research on AI applications in ultrasound for endometrial cancer primarily focuses on developing classification models to distinguish benign from malignant endometrial lesions and to stage the disease. Overall, ultrasound-based AI models have demonstrated strong predictive performance. However, most studies are limited by small sample sizes and a lack of external validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 11","pages":"102653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To synthesize the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in ultrasound imaging for the assessment of endometrial cancer, with a focus on methodological approaches and diagnostic accuracy in predicting different outcomes.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception up to January 16, 2025. Studies applying AI to ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and management of endometrial malignant pathology were included. Quality assessment of the retrieved studies was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Artificial Intelligence-Centered Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-AI). The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration record CRD42025648961).

Results: Thirty studies were included: 18 (60%) distinguished between benign and malignant endometrial lesions, 4 (13.3%) focused on predicting lymph node metastases, 3 (10%) evaluated myometrial invasion, and 2 (6.6%) classified tumor risk. Additionally, 2 studies assessed disease-free survival (6.6%), while another developed a model for the automated identification of endometrial lesions (3.3%). According to QUADAS-AI, most studies were at high risk of bias for subject selection (eg, sample size not specified, imaging preprocessing not performed) (27/30, 90%) and the index test (no external validation) (27/30, 90%) domains, and at low risk of bias for the reference standard (target condition correctly classified by the reference standard) (29/30, 97%) and the workflow (reasonable time between index test and reference standard) (29/30, 97%) domains. Models were externally validated in 3/30 studies (10%), internally cross-validated in 3/30 (10%), internally hold-out validated in 13/30 (43.3%), and not validated in 11/30 (36.7%).

Conclusions: Published research on AI applications in ultrasound for endometrial cancer primarily focuses on developing classification models to distinguish benign from malignant endometrial lesions and to stage the disease. Overall, ultrasound-based AI models have demonstrated strong predictive performance. However, most studies are limited by small sample sizes and a lack of external validation.

人工智能在子宫内膜癌超声诊断中的应用综述
目的:综合人工智能(AI)在子宫内膜癌超声成像评估中的应用,重点探讨预测不同结果的方法学方法和诊断准确性。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,检索时间为成立至2025年1月16日。包括应用人工智能超声成像在子宫内膜恶性病理诊断、分期和治疗中的研究。使用以人工智能为中心的诊断测试准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-AI)对检索到的研究进行质量评估。协议在PROSPERO数据库中注册(注册记录CRD42025648961)。结果:纳入30项研究:18项(60%)研究区分子宫内膜良恶性病变,4项(13.3%)研究预测淋巴结转移,3项(10%)研究评估子宫肌层浸润,2项(6.6%)研究分类肿瘤风险。此外,2项研究评估了无病生存率(6.6%),而另一项研究开发了子宫内膜病变自动识别模型(3.3%)。根据QUADAS-AI,大多数研究在受试者选择(如未指定样本量、未进行成像预处理)(27/ 30,90%)和指标测试(未进行外部验证)(27/ 30,90%)领域存在高偏倚风险,在参考标准(参考标准正确分类的目标条件)(29/ 30,97%)和工作流程(指标测试与参考标准之间的合理时间)(29/ 30,97%)领域存在低偏倚风险。模型在3/30的研究中被外部验证(10%),在3/30的研究中被内部交叉验证(10%),在13/30的研究中被内部保留验证(43.3%),在11/30的研究中未被验证(36.7%)。结论:已发表的人工智能在子宫内膜癌超声诊断中的应用研究主要集中在建立分类模型,以区分子宫内膜良恶性病变并对疾病进行分期。总体而言,基于超声波的人工智能模型显示出强大的预测性能。然而,大多数研究受到样本量小和缺乏外部验证的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信