On-site detection of MERS-CoV infections in a camel slaughterhouse in Kenya using a commercial rapid antigen test.

IF 2.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1675847
Brian Maina Ogoti, Victor Riitho, Jordi Rodon, Nyamai Mutono, Julia Tesch, Julius Oyugi, Marianne W Mureithi, Victor M Corman, Christian Drosten, Johanna Wildemann, Samuel M Thumbi, Marcel A Müller
{"title":"On-site detection of MERS-CoV infections in a camel slaughterhouse in Kenya using a commercial rapid antigen test.","authors":"Brian Maina Ogoti, Victor Riitho, Jordi Rodon, Nyamai Mutono, Julia Tesch, Julius Oyugi, Marianne W Mureithi, Victor M Corman, Christian Drosten, Johanna Wildemann, Samuel M Thumbi, Marcel A Müller","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1675847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) poses a significant public health risk, with dromedary camels being the primary reservoir hosts. Regular and systematic surveillance for MERS-CoV is limited by the lack of extensively validated, rapid, field-deployable diagnostic tools.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to validate and implement a commercial MERS-CoV antigen test kit (Bionote, South Korea) for field surveillance of MERS-CoV in Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated whether the Bionote MERS-CoV rapid antigen test can discriminate between two different MERS-CoV isolates representing clades A (EMC/2012) and C (Kenya/9954). We conducted an assay performance evaluation using 2,736 archived camel nasal swab samples with defined MERS-CoV RNA concentrations (10<sup>3</sup>-10<sup>9</sup> MERS-CoV RNA copies/ml). Subsequently, we performed a prospective study at the central camel slaughterhouse in Isiolo, northern Kenya, testing 386 samples collected from March-April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MERS-CoV strain-specific testing showed consistent virus antigen detection for both applied MERS-CoV isolates, with no statistically significant differences in positivity thresholds. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis based on the 2,736 archived MERS-CoV clade C RNA-pretested camel samples identified a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.53 × 10<sup>6</sup> RNA copies/ml. The estimated LOD at 90% probability (LOD<sub>90</sub>) was 5.01 × 10<sup>5</sup> RNA copies/ml. Out of the 2,736 tested samples, 9 samples (0.33%) were positive in the MERS-CoV rapid antigen test showing a diagnostic sensitivity of 25% compared to RT-qPCR and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 99.9-100%), with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.40. Critically, the test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for infectious samples with viral loads >10<sup>6</sup> copies/ml. All 9 samples had RNA genome copies/ml above the LOD. For 7/9 samples (78%) virus isolation was successful. In the prospective study, we identified 3/386 MERS-CoV-antigen positive camels by the rapid antigen test on-site which we confirmed by MERS-CoV upE- and orf1a-based RT-qPCR assays.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The commercial Bionote MERS-CoV antigen test kit demonstrates reliable, clade-independent detection, enabling rapid MERS-CoV surveillance in camels in high-risk settings. The majority of antigen-positive samples contained infectious virus suggesting its applicability for assessing infection risks at slaughterhouses by the rapid test. The successful identification of MERS-CoV-infected camels at the point of slaughter underscores the critical importance of rapid diagnostics in high-exposure environments to mitigate zoonotic transmission and protect the health of slaughterhouse workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1675847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1675847","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) poses a significant public health risk, with dromedary camels being the primary reservoir hosts. Regular and systematic surveillance for MERS-CoV is limited by the lack of extensively validated, rapid, field-deployable diagnostic tools.

Objective: We aimed to validate and implement a commercial MERS-CoV antigen test kit (Bionote, South Korea) for field surveillance of MERS-CoV in Kenya.

Methods: We evaluated whether the Bionote MERS-CoV rapid antigen test can discriminate between two different MERS-CoV isolates representing clades A (EMC/2012) and C (Kenya/9954). We conducted an assay performance evaluation using 2,736 archived camel nasal swab samples with defined MERS-CoV RNA concentrations (103-109 MERS-CoV RNA copies/ml). Subsequently, we performed a prospective study at the central camel slaughterhouse in Isiolo, northern Kenya, testing 386 samples collected from March-April 2024.

Results: MERS-CoV strain-specific testing showed consistent virus antigen detection for both applied MERS-CoV isolates, with no statistically significant differences in positivity thresholds. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis based on the 2,736 archived MERS-CoV clade C RNA-pretested camel samples identified a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.53 × 106 RNA copies/ml. The estimated LOD at 90% probability (LOD90) was 5.01 × 105 RNA copies/ml. Out of the 2,736 tested samples, 9 samples (0.33%) were positive in the MERS-CoV rapid antigen test showing a diagnostic sensitivity of 25% compared to RT-qPCR and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 99.9-100%), with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.40. Critically, the test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for infectious samples with viral loads >106 copies/ml. All 9 samples had RNA genome copies/ml above the LOD. For 7/9 samples (78%) virus isolation was successful. In the prospective study, we identified 3/386 MERS-CoV-antigen positive camels by the rapid antigen test on-site which we confirmed by MERS-CoV upE- and orf1a-based RT-qPCR assays.

Conclusion: The commercial Bionote MERS-CoV antigen test kit demonstrates reliable, clade-independent detection, enabling rapid MERS-CoV surveillance in camels in high-risk settings. The majority of antigen-positive samples contained infectious virus suggesting its applicability for assessing infection risks at slaughterhouses by the rapid test. The successful identification of MERS-CoV-infected camels at the point of slaughter underscores the critical importance of rapid diagnostics in high-exposure environments to mitigate zoonotic transmission and protect the health of slaughterhouse workers.

使用商业快速抗原检测在肯尼亚骆驼屠宰场现场检测中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒感染。
背景:中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)具有重大公共卫生风险,单峰骆驼是主要宿主。由于缺乏经过广泛验证的、快速的、可在现场部署的诊断工具,对中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒的定期和系统监测受到限制。目的:我们旨在验证和实施一种商用MERS-CoV抗原检测试剂盒(Bionote,韩国),用于肯尼亚MERS-CoV的现场监测。方法:我们评估Bionote MERS-CoV快速抗原检测是否可以区分代表进化支A (EMC/2012)和C (Kenya/9954)的两个不同的MERS-CoV分离株。我们对2736份存档的骆驼鼻拭子样本进行了检测性能评估,这些样本具有明确的MERS-CoV RNA浓度(103-109 MERS-CoV RNA拷贝/ml)。随后,我们在肯尼亚北部Isiolo的中央骆驼屠宰场进行了一项前瞻性研究,测试了2024年3月至4月收集的386份样本。结果:两株MERS-CoV分离株的病毒抗原检测结果一致,阳性阈值差异无统计学意义。基于2,736份存档的MERS-CoV分支C RNA预测骆驼样本的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析发现,检出限(LOD)为1.53 × 106 RNA拷贝/ml。估计90%概率的LOD90为5.01 × 105 RNA拷贝/ml。在2736份检测样本中,9份(0.33%)MERS-CoV快速抗原检测呈阳性,与RT-qPCR相比,诊断敏感性为25%,特异性为100% (95% CI, 99.9-100%), Cohen’s Kappa为0.40。至关重要的是,该测试对病毒载量为100 - 106拷贝/ml的感染性样品显示了100%的敏感性。所有9个样本的RNA基因组拷贝数/ml均高于LOD。7/9个样本(78%)病毒分离成功。在前瞻性研究中,我们通过快速抗原检测现场鉴定出3/386头MERS-CoV抗原阳性的骆驼,并通过基于MERS-CoV upE和orf1的RT-qPCR检测证实。结论:Bionote商用MERS-CoV抗原检测试剂盒具有可靠、独立于进化支的检测效果,可在高风险环境中对骆驼进行MERS-CoV快速监测。大多数抗原阳性样本含有传染性病毒,表明其适用于通过快速检测来评估屠宰场的感染风险。在屠宰时成功识别出感染中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒的骆驼,凸显了在高暴露环境中进行快速诊断对于减轻人畜共患病传播和保护屠宰场工人健康的至关重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信