{"title":"The predictive value of PSMA PET/CT in determining pathological upgrading of prostate cancer: A pooling up analysis.","authors":"Yue Liu, Shu-Pei Qu, Ling-Yun Zhai","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1525890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The issue of pathological upgrading following radical prostatectomy poses a significant challenge for urologists, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography(PET/CT) has gained increasing prominence as a preoperative assessment tool for patients with prostate cancer in recent years. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in predicting pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using data from the Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through March 2024. We strictly adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA statement for conducting this diagnostic meta-analysis. We computed the pooled diagnostic accuracy and evaluated heterogeneity while exploring potential sources of heterogeneity through subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies involving 507 patients were included in the final analysis. All participants had biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer and underwent radical prostatectomy. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent PSMA PET/CT imaging. The pooled diagnostic accuracy yielded a sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60 - 0.76) and specificity of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59 - 0.85). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated as 0.74 (95%CI, 0.70 - 0.78). Although heterogeneity was observed, its source remained unclear.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSMA PET/CT demonstrates a moderate level of accuracy in predicting pathological upgrading following radical prostatectomy, making it a tool with potential clinical application value, particularly in the field of radiotherapy. However, further studies are warranted to enhance its relevance and applicability.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024503406.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1525890"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1525890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The issue of pathological upgrading following radical prostatectomy poses a significant challenge for urologists, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography(PET/CT) has gained increasing prominence as a preoperative assessment tool for patients with prostate cancer in recent years. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in predicting pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using data from the Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through March 2024. We strictly adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA statement for conducting this diagnostic meta-analysis. We computed the pooled diagnostic accuracy and evaluated heterogeneity while exploring potential sources of heterogeneity through subgroup analysis.
Results: A total of 7 studies involving 507 patients were included in the final analysis. All participants had biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer and underwent radical prostatectomy. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent PSMA PET/CT imaging. The pooled diagnostic accuracy yielded a sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60 - 0.76) and specificity of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59 - 0.85). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated as 0.74 (95%CI, 0.70 - 0.78). Although heterogeneity was observed, its source remained unclear.
Conclusion: The PSMA PET/CT demonstrates a moderate level of accuracy in predicting pathological upgrading following radical prostatectomy, making it a tool with potential clinical application value, particularly in the field of radiotherapy. However, further studies are warranted to enhance its relevance and applicability.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.