{"title":"Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques on the BraTS dataset for brain tumor classification.","authors":"Shuping Wang, Min Li","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1596718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate classification of brain tumors from MRI scans is a critical task for improving patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods have shown promise in this domain, but their relative performance remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates several ML and DL techniques using the BraTS 2024 dataset. The models assessed include traditional algorithms such as Random Forest and advanced deep learning architectures including Simple CNN, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, Inception-ResNetV2, and EfficientNet. Preprocessing strategies were applied to optimize model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Random Forest classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 87%, outperforming all deep learning models, which achieved accuracy in the range of 47% to 70%. This indicates that traditional ML approaches can sometimes surpass state-of-the-art DL methods in tumor classification tasks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of model selection and parameter tuning in automated brain tumor diagnosis. While deep learning models are generally considered standard for image analysis, Random Forest demonstrated superior performance in this context. This underscores the need for fine-grained consideration of dataset characteristics, computational resources, and diagnostic requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows that carefully selected and optimized ML approaches can improve tumor classification and support more accurate and efficient diagnostic systems for brain tumor patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1596718"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1596718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate classification of brain tumors from MRI scans is a critical task for improving patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods have shown promise in this domain, but their relative performance remains unclear.
Methods: This study evaluates several ML and DL techniques using the BraTS 2024 dataset. The models assessed include traditional algorithms such as Random Forest and advanced deep learning architectures including Simple CNN, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, Inception-ResNetV2, and EfficientNet. Preprocessing strategies were applied to optimize model performance.
Results: The Random Forest classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 87%, outperforming all deep learning models, which achieved accuracy in the range of 47% to 70%. This indicates that traditional ML approaches can sometimes surpass state-of-the-art DL methods in tumor classification tasks.
Discussion: The findings highlight the importance of model selection and parameter tuning in automated brain tumor diagnosis. While deep learning models are generally considered standard for image analysis, Random Forest demonstrated superior performance in this context. This underscores the need for fine-grained consideration of dataset characteristics, computational resources, and diagnostic requirements.
Conclusion: The study shows that carefully selected and optimized ML approaches can improve tumor classification and support more accurate and efficient diagnostic systems for brain tumor patients.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.