Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques on the BraTS dataset for brain tumor classification.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1596718
Shuping Wang, Min Li
{"title":"Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques on the BraTS dataset for brain tumor classification.","authors":"Shuping Wang, Min Li","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1596718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate classification of brain tumors from MRI scans is a critical task for improving patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods have shown promise in this domain, but their relative performance remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates several ML and DL techniques using the BraTS 2024 dataset. The models assessed include traditional algorithms such as Random Forest and advanced deep learning architectures including Simple CNN, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, Inception-ResNetV2, and EfficientNet. Preprocessing strategies were applied to optimize model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Random Forest classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 87%, outperforming all deep learning models, which achieved accuracy in the range of 47% to 70%. This indicates that traditional ML approaches can sometimes surpass state-of-the-art DL methods in tumor classification tasks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of model selection and parameter tuning in automated brain tumor diagnosis. While deep learning models are generally considered standard for image analysis, Random Forest demonstrated superior performance in this context. This underscores the need for fine-grained consideration of dataset characteristics, computational resources, and diagnostic requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows that carefully selected and optimized ML approaches can improve tumor classification and support more accurate and efficient diagnostic systems for brain tumor patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1596718"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1596718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate classification of brain tumors from MRI scans is a critical task for improving patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods have shown promise in this domain, but their relative performance remains unclear.

Methods: This study evaluates several ML and DL techniques using the BraTS 2024 dataset. The models assessed include traditional algorithms such as Random Forest and advanced deep learning architectures including Simple CNN, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, Inception-ResNetV2, and EfficientNet. Preprocessing strategies were applied to optimize model performance.

Results: The Random Forest classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 87%, outperforming all deep learning models, which achieved accuracy in the range of 47% to 70%. This indicates that traditional ML approaches can sometimes surpass state-of-the-art DL methods in tumor classification tasks.

Discussion: The findings highlight the importance of model selection and parameter tuning in automated brain tumor diagnosis. While deep learning models are generally considered standard for image analysis, Random Forest demonstrated superior performance in this context. This underscores the need for fine-grained consideration of dataset characteristics, computational resources, and diagnostic requirements.

Conclusion: The study shows that carefully selected and optimized ML approaches can improve tumor classification and support more accurate and efficient diagnostic systems for brain tumor patients.

基于BraTS数据集的机器学习技术在脑肿瘤分类中的比较分析。
导读:从MRI扫描中准确分类脑肿瘤是改善患者预后的关键任务。机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)方法在这一领域显示出了前景,但它们的相对性能仍不清楚。方法:本研究使用BraTS 2024数据集评估了几种ML和DL技术。评估的模型包括Random Forest等传统算法和Simple CNN、VGG16、VGG19、ResNet50、Inception-ResNetV2和EfficientNet等高级深度学习架构。采用预处理策略优化模型性能。结果:随机森林分类器达到了87%的最高准确率,优于所有深度学习模型,后者的准确率在47%到70%之间。这表明传统的机器学习方法有时可以在肿瘤分类任务中超越最先进的深度学习方法。讨论:研究结果强调了模型选择和参数调整在脑肿瘤自动诊断中的重要性。虽然深度学习模型通常被认为是图像分析的标准,但随机森林在这方面表现出了卓越的性能。这强调了对数据集特征、计算资源和诊断需求进行细粒度考虑的必要性。结论:研究表明,精心选择和优化的ML方法可以提高肿瘤的分类水平,为脑肿瘤患者提供更准确、高效的诊断系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信