Combining radiomics of X-rays with patient functional rating scales for predicting satisfaction after radial fracture fixation: a multimodal machine learning predictive model.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Changsen Yang, Zhengfeng Jia, Weilu Gao, Cheng Xu, Licheng Zhang, Jiantao Li
{"title":"Combining radiomics of X-rays with patient functional rating scales for predicting satisfaction after radial fracture fixation: a multimodal machine learning predictive model.","authors":"Changsen Yang, Zhengfeng Jia, Weilu Gao, Cheng Xu, Licheng Zhang, Jiantao Li","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-09160-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient satisfaction after one year of distal radius fracture fixation is influenced by various aspects such as the surgical approach, the patient's physical functioning, and psychological factors. Hence, a multimodal machine learning prediction model combining traditional rating scales and postoperative X-ray images of patients was developed to predict patient satisfaction one year after surgery for personalized clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we reviewed 385 patients who underwent internal fixation with a palmar plate or external fixation bracket fixation in 2018-2020. After one year of postoperative follow-up, 169 patients completed the patient wrist evaluation (PRWE), EuroQol5D (EQ-5D), and forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12) questionnaires and were subjected to X-ray capture. The region of interest (ROI) of postoperative X-rays was outlined using 3D Slicer, and the training and test sets were divided based on the satisfaction of the patients. Python was used to extract 848 image features, and random forest embedding was used to reduce feature dimensionality. Also, a machine learning model combining the patient's functional rating scale with the downscaled X-ray-related image features was built, followed by hyperparameter debugging using the grid search method during the modeling process. The stability of the Radiomics and Integrated models was first verified using the five-fold cross-validation method, and then receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the model on the training and test sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The feature dimensionality reduction yielded 16 imaging features. The accuracy of the two models was 0.831, 0.784 and 0.966, 0.804 on the training and test sets, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the Radiomics and Integrated model were 0.937, 0.673 and 0.997, 0.823 for the training and test sets, respectively. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) of the Integrated model for the training and test sets had a more accurate prediction probability and clinical significance than the Radiomics model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multimodal machine learning predictive model combining imaging and patient functional rating scales demonstrated optimal predictive performance for one-year postoperative satisfaction in patients with radial fractures, providing a basis for personalized postoperative patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09160-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction after one year of distal radius fracture fixation is influenced by various aspects such as the surgical approach, the patient's physical functioning, and psychological factors. Hence, a multimodal machine learning prediction model combining traditional rating scales and postoperative X-ray images of patients was developed to predict patient satisfaction one year after surgery for personalized clinical treatment.

Methods: In this study, we reviewed 385 patients who underwent internal fixation with a palmar plate or external fixation bracket fixation in 2018-2020. After one year of postoperative follow-up, 169 patients completed the patient wrist evaluation (PRWE), EuroQol5D (EQ-5D), and forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12) questionnaires and were subjected to X-ray capture. The region of interest (ROI) of postoperative X-rays was outlined using 3D Slicer, and the training and test sets were divided based on the satisfaction of the patients. Python was used to extract 848 image features, and random forest embedding was used to reduce feature dimensionality. Also, a machine learning model combining the patient's functional rating scale with the downscaled X-ray-related image features was built, followed by hyperparameter debugging using the grid search method during the modeling process. The stability of the Radiomics and Integrated models was first verified using the five-fold cross-validation method, and then receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the model on the training and test sets.

Results: The feature dimensionality reduction yielded 16 imaging features. The accuracy of the two models was 0.831, 0.784 and 0.966, 0.804 on the training and test sets, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the Radiomics and Integrated model were 0.937, 0.673 and 0.997, 0.823 for the training and test sets, respectively. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) of the Integrated model for the training and test sets had a more accurate prediction probability and clinical significance than the Radiomics model.

Conclusions: A multimodal machine learning predictive model combining imaging and patient functional rating scales demonstrated optimal predictive performance for one-year postoperative satisfaction in patients with radial fractures, providing a basis for personalized postoperative patient management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

结合x射线组学和患者功能评分量表预测桡骨骨折固定后满意度:多模态机器学习预测模型。
背景:桡骨远端骨折固定一年后患者满意度受手术入路、患者身体功能、心理因素等多方面影响。因此,我们开发了一种结合传统评分量表和患者术后x线图像的多模态机器学习预测模型,用于预测患者术后一年的满意度,以进行个性化的临床治疗。方法:在本研究中,我们回顾了2018-2020年接受掌板内固定或外固定支架内固定的385例患者。术后随访1年后,169例患者完成患者腕关节评估(PRWE)、EuroQol5D (EQ-5D)和遗忘关节评分-12 (FJS-12)问卷调查,并进行x线拍摄。利用3D切片机对术后x线感兴趣区域(ROI)进行勾画,并根据患者满意度划分训练集和测试集。使用Python提取848个图像特征,并使用随机森林嵌入对特征进行降维。同时,将患者的功能评定量表与x射线相关图像的缩小比例特征相结合,建立机器学习模型,并在建模过程中使用网格搜索方法进行超参数调试。首先采用五重交叉验证法对Radiomics和Integrated模型的稳定性进行验证,然后采用受试者工作特征曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析对模型在训练集和测试集上的性能进行评价。结果:特征降维得到16个影像特征。两种模型在训练集和测试集上的准确率分别为0.831、0.784和0.966、0.804。Radiomics和Integrated模型的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.937、0.673和0.997、0.823。综合模型对训练集和测试集的校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)的预测概率和临床意义均高于Radiomics模型。结论:结合影像学和患者功能评分量表的多模态机器学习预测模型对桡骨骨折患者术后1年满意度的预测效果最佳,为患者术后个性化管理提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信