Borderline Z-scores in non-invasive prenatal screening: does its presence hold clinical significance?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Xiaoli Pan, Lixin Weng, Yun Pan, Shuqing Pan, Shanshan Wu, Changshui Chen, Haibo Li
{"title":"Borderline Z-scores in non-invasive prenatal screening: does its presence hold clinical significance?","authors":"Xiaoli Pan, Lixin Weng, Yun Pan, Shuqing Pan, Shanshan Wu, Changshui Chen, Haibo Li","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08193-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the utility of repeated testing for the detection of fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from maternal peripheral blood in cases with borderline Z-scores and to analyze the associated pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83,443 pregnant women who voluntarily underwent non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at the Affiliated Women and Children's Hospital of Ningbo University between January 2020 and January 2024. Pregnant women whose initial NIPT results indicated borderline Z-scores were subsequently followed up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 83,443 pregnant women undergoing NIPT, 700 cases (0.84%) initially showed borderline Z-scores. After retesting, this number decreased to 211 cases (0.25%) and further decreased to 26 cases (0.03%) after re-sampling. Among the initial 700 cases, 34 exhibited abnormal NIPT results, corresponding to a positive rate of 5.29%. Subsequent prenatal diagnosis confirmed a total of six fetal abnormalities, including one case of trisomy 13 mosaicism, one case of trisomy 21 mosaicism, one case of 47,XXY, two cases of copy number variations (CNVs), and one case with B-ultrasound findings indicating an abnormality (nuchal translucency [NT] of 3.5 mm and omphalocele). The overall rate of fetal abnormalities was 0.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial NIPT outcomes suggested elevated screening positive rates and a higher incidence of fetal abnormalities among cases with borderline Z-scores compared to the general population. Establishing a defined borderline Z-score threshold in NIPT protocols is crucial to mitigate the risk of missed screenings. Implementing re-construction and/or re-sampling procedures significantly reduces the failure rate attributed to borderline Z-scores, facilitating the accurate identification of most of pregnancies with normal fetal development and decreasing the need for unnecessary invasive prenatal diagnostic interventions. Pregnant women with detection failures due to borderline Z-scores should be actively counseled and encouraged to pursue prenatal diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08193-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the utility of repeated testing for the detection of fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from maternal peripheral blood in cases with borderline Z-scores and to analyze the associated pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83,443 pregnant women who voluntarily underwent non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at the Affiliated Women and Children's Hospital of Ningbo University between January 2020 and January 2024. Pregnant women whose initial NIPT results indicated borderline Z-scores were subsequently followed up.

Results: Among 83,443 pregnant women undergoing NIPT, 700 cases (0.84%) initially showed borderline Z-scores. After retesting, this number decreased to 211 cases (0.25%) and further decreased to 26 cases (0.03%) after re-sampling. Among the initial 700 cases, 34 exhibited abnormal NIPT results, corresponding to a positive rate of 5.29%. Subsequent prenatal diagnosis confirmed a total of six fetal abnormalities, including one case of trisomy 13 mosaicism, one case of trisomy 21 mosaicism, one case of 47,XXY, two cases of copy number variations (CNVs), and one case with B-ultrasound findings indicating an abnormality (nuchal translucency [NT] of 3.5 mm and omphalocele). The overall rate of fetal abnormalities was 0.9%.

Conclusion: Initial NIPT outcomes suggested elevated screening positive rates and a higher incidence of fetal abnormalities among cases with borderline Z-scores compared to the general population. Establishing a defined borderline Z-score threshold in NIPT protocols is crucial to mitigate the risk of missed screenings. Implementing re-construction and/or re-sampling procedures significantly reduces the failure rate attributed to borderline Z-scores, facilitating the accurate identification of most of pregnancies with normal fetal development and decreasing the need for unnecessary invasive prenatal diagnostic interventions. Pregnant women with detection failures due to borderline Z-scores should be actively counseled and encouraged to pursue prenatal diagnosis.

无创产前筛查中的边界z分数:是否具有临床意义?
背景:本研究旨在探讨在z评分为临界值的孕妇外周血中重复检测胎儿无细胞DNA (cfDNA)的效用,并分析相关的妊娠结局。方法:对2020年1月至2024年1月在宁波大学附属妇幼医院自愿接受无创产前检查(NIPT)的83443例孕妇进行回顾性分析。最初NIPT结果显示z分数接近临界值的孕妇随后进行了随访。结果:在83443例接受NIPT的孕妇中,700例(0.84%)最初显示临界z分数。重新检测后,这一数字下降到211例(0.25%),重新采样后进一步下降到26例(0.03%)。在最初的700例中,34例NIPT结果异常,阳性率为5.29%。随后的产前诊断共确认了6例胎儿异常,包括1例13三体嵌合体,1例21三体嵌合体,1例47,XXY, 2例拷贝数变异(CNVs), 1例b超发现异常(颈透明[NT] 3.5 mm和脐突出)。总体胎儿畸形率为0.9%。结论:初始NIPT结果表明,与一般人群相比,具有临界z分数的病例中筛查阳性率升高,胎儿异常发生率更高。在NIPT协议中建立一个定义的临界z评分阈值对于降低漏诊的风险至关重要。实施重建和/或重新采样程序显著降低了由于临界z分数导致的失败率,促进了对大多数胎儿发育正常的妊娠的准确识别,减少了不必要的侵入性产前诊断干预的需要。由于临界z分数导致检测失败的孕妇应积极咨询并鼓励进行产前诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信