Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Hepatectomy in Patients Receiving Triplet Versus Doublet Preoperative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Agostino M De Rose, Elena Panettieri, Mateo Lendoire, Yosuke Nakao, Eleanor A Fallon, Caterina Mele, Marc-Antoine Allard, Timothy E Newhook, Francesco Ardito, René Adam, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, Felice Giuliante
{"title":"Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Hepatectomy in Patients Receiving Triplet Versus Doublet Preoperative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.","authors":"Agostino M De Rose, Elena Panettieri, Mateo Lendoire, Yosuke Nakao, Eleanor A Fallon, Caterina Mele, Marc-Antoine Allard, Timothy E Newhook, Francesco Ardito, René Adam, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, Felice Giuliante","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18413-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>FOLFOXIRI is associated with better response and higher resection rates than doublet regimens for colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, irinotecan and oxaliplatin may cause liver injury, increasing the risk of hepatectomy. This study compared outcomes between patients receiving FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI before undergoing CLM resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing CLM resection during 2010-2021 after preoperative FOLFOXIRI or FOLFOX/FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy. Patients receiving multiple lines of therapy were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1711 patients included, 160 (9.4%) received FOLFOXIRI and 1551 (90.6%) received FOLFOX/FOLFIRI. Patients receiving FOLFOXIRI were younger (median age 55 vs. 59 years; p < 0.001), had a higher rate of synchronous CLM (93.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and had a higher median tumor burden score (TBS; 5.6 vs. 4.1; p < 0.001). In both groups, a median of six cycles of preoperative chemotherapy were administered. Outcomes after FOLFOXIRI (vs. FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) were as follows: major hepatectomy, 44.4% of patients (vs. 35.3%; p = 0.024), median estimated blood loss, 300 mL (vs. 200 mL; p = 0.006), rate of intraoperative blood transfusion, 8.1% (vs. 4.4%; p = 0.034), 90-day major complication rate, 13.3% (vs. 10.0%; p = 0.193), 90-day mortality rate, 1.2% (vs. 0.6%; p = 0.324), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, 66.6% (vs. 56.4%; p = 0.072). Medium-high TBS, synchronous extrahepatic disease, positive resection margin, and RAS mutation were independent risk factors for poor OS. Patients with medium-high TBS had a significantly better 5-year OS rate after FOLFOXIRI than after FOLFOX/FOLFIRI (67.6% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with CLM with higher disease burden, FOLFOXIRI may be preferable to FOLFOX/FOLFIRI for preoperative chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18413-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: FOLFOXIRI is associated with better response and higher resection rates than doublet regimens for colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, irinotecan and oxaliplatin may cause liver injury, increasing the risk of hepatectomy. This study compared outcomes between patients receiving FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI before undergoing CLM resection.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing CLM resection during 2010-2021 after preoperative FOLFOXIRI or FOLFOX/FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy. Patients receiving multiple lines of therapy were excluded.

Results: Of 1711 patients included, 160 (9.4%) received FOLFOXIRI and 1551 (90.6%) received FOLFOX/FOLFIRI. Patients receiving FOLFOXIRI were younger (median age 55 vs. 59 years; p < 0.001), had a higher rate of synchronous CLM (93.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and had a higher median tumor burden score (TBS; 5.6 vs. 4.1; p < 0.001). In both groups, a median of six cycles of preoperative chemotherapy were administered. Outcomes after FOLFOXIRI (vs. FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) were as follows: major hepatectomy, 44.4% of patients (vs. 35.3%; p = 0.024), median estimated blood loss, 300 mL (vs. 200 mL; p = 0.006), rate of intraoperative blood transfusion, 8.1% (vs. 4.4%; p = 0.034), 90-day major complication rate, 13.3% (vs. 10.0%; p = 0.193), 90-day mortality rate, 1.2% (vs. 0.6%; p = 0.324), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, 66.6% (vs. 56.4%; p = 0.072). Medium-high TBS, synchronous extrahepatic disease, positive resection margin, and RAS mutation were independent risk factors for poor OS. Patients with medium-high TBS had a significantly better 5-year OS rate after FOLFOXIRI than after FOLFOX/FOLFIRI (67.6% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.004).

Conclusion: In patients with CLM with higher disease burden, FOLFOXIRI may be preferable to FOLFOX/FOLFIRI for preoperative chemotherapy.

三联化疗与双联化疗对结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后的短期和长期预后
背景:FOLFOXIRI治疗结直肠肝转移(CLM)比双重方案有更好的疗效和更高的切除率;然而,伊立替康和奥沙利铂可能引起肝损伤,增加肝切除术的风险。这项研究比较了在CLM切除术前接受FOLFOXIRI和FOLFOX/FOLFIRI的患者的结果。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了术前FOLFOXIRI或FOLFOX/FOLFIRI作为一线化疗后,于2010-2021年间连续行CLM切除术的患者。接受多种治疗的患者被排除在外。结果:纳入的1711例患者中,160例(9.4%)接受了FOLFOXIRI治疗,1551例(90.6%)接受了FOLFOX/FOLFIRI治疗。接受FOLFOXIRI的患者更年轻(中位年龄55岁vs. 59岁);p结论:对于疾病负担较高的CLM患者,FOLFOXIRI可能比FOLFOX/FOLFIRI更适合术前化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信