Unguided self-help to bridge waiting time for face-to-face therapy in a university student mental health service: interrupted time series analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Matilda Floris, Giovanni Bruno, Marianna Purgato, Irene Cammilli, Gioia Bottesi, Silvia Salcuni, Andrea Spoto, Claudio Gentili, Ioana Alina Cristea
{"title":"Unguided self-help to bridge waiting time for face-to-face therapy in a university student mental health service: interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Matilda Floris, Giovanni Bruno, Marianna Purgato, Irene Cammilli, Gioia Bottesi, Silvia Salcuni, Andrea Spoto, Claudio Gentili, Ioana Alina Cristea","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Marked increases in mental health services utilisation across university settings mean that students often spend long periods waiting for evaluation and treatment.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess whether digital unguided self-help delivered while waiting for face-to-face therapy could reduce anxiety and depression and improve functioning in university students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively analysed routinely collected data from the student mental health service at the University of Padua, Italy. From June 2022, all students waiting for clinical evaluation and treatment received a self-help stress management booklet (The World Health Organization's <i>Doing What Matters in Time of Stress</i> (DWM)). The clinical evaluation included depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7) and functional impairment (Work and Social Adjustment Scale). Single-group interrupted time series (ITS) analyses compared outcomes in users contacting the service between October 2021 and 23 June 2022 (pre-intervention) and, respectively, between 24 June 2022 and 18 November 2023 (post-intervention).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and forty-nine Italian students (77% women, median age 23 years) were included; of these, 411 (55%) received the intervention and 338 (45%) did not. ITS indicated that the intervention introduction coincided with immediate and sharp decreases in depression (level change, <i>β</i> = -2.26, 95% CI -3.89, -0.64), anxiety (<i>β</i> = -1.50, 95% CI -3.89, -0.65) and impaired functioning (<i>β</i> = -2.66, 95% CI -4.64, -0.60), all largely maintained over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the absence of a control group, no causal inferences about intervention effects could be drawn. DWM should be studied as a promising candidate for bridging waiting time for face-to-face treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 6","pages":"e227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Marked increases in mental health services utilisation across university settings mean that students often spend long periods waiting for evaluation and treatment.

Aims: To assess whether digital unguided self-help delivered while waiting for face-to-face therapy could reduce anxiety and depression and improve functioning in university students.

Method: We retrospectively analysed routinely collected data from the student mental health service at the University of Padua, Italy. From June 2022, all students waiting for clinical evaluation and treatment received a self-help stress management booklet (The World Health Organization's Doing What Matters in Time of Stress (DWM)). The clinical evaluation included depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7) and functional impairment (Work and Social Adjustment Scale). Single-group interrupted time series (ITS) analyses compared outcomes in users contacting the service between October 2021 and 23 June 2022 (pre-intervention) and, respectively, between 24 June 2022 and 18 November 2023 (post-intervention).

Results: Seven hundred and forty-nine Italian students (77% women, median age 23 years) were included; of these, 411 (55%) received the intervention and 338 (45%) did not. ITS indicated that the intervention introduction coincided with immediate and sharp decreases in depression (level change, β = -2.26, 95% CI -3.89, -0.64), anxiety (β = -1.50, 95% CI -3.89, -0.65) and impaired functioning (β = -2.66, 95% CI -4.64, -0.60), all largely maintained over time.

Conclusions: In the absence of a control group, no causal inferences about intervention effects could be drawn. DWM should be studied as a promising candidate for bridging waiting time for face-to-face treatment.

无指导自助缩短大学生心理健康服务面对面治疗的等待时间:中断时间序列分析。
背景:大学环境中心理健康服务使用率的显著增加意味着学生通常要花很长时间等待评估和治疗。目的:评估在等待面对面治疗时提供的数字无指导自助是否可以减少大学生的焦虑和抑郁,并改善其功能。方法:我们回顾性分析了意大利帕多瓦大学学生心理健康服务常规收集的数据。从2022年6月起,所有等待临床评估和治疗的学生都收到了一本自助压力管理小册子(世界卫生组织的“压力时刻做什么”(DWM))。临床评估包括抑郁(患者健康问卷-9)、焦虑(广泛性焦虑障碍-7)和功能障碍(工作与社会适应量表)。单组中断时间序列(ITS)分析比较了2021年10月至2022年6月23日(干预前)和2022年6月24日至2023年11月18日(干预后)期间联系该服务的用户的结果。结果:纳入749名意大利学生(77%为女性,中位年龄23岁);其中,411人(55%)接受了干预,338人(45%)没有。ITS表明,干预措施的引入与抑郁(水平变化,β = -2.26, 95% CI -3.89, -0.64),焦虑(β = -1.50, 95% CI -3.89, -0.65)和功能受损(β = -2.66, 95% CI -4.64, -0.60)的立即和急剧下降相一致,这些都在很大程度上维持了一段时间。结论:在没有对照组的情况下,无法得出干预效果的因果推论。DWM应该作为缩短面对面治疗等待时间的有希望的候选者进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信