Tomás Cabeza de Baca, Hannah T Fry, Andrés M Treviño-Alvarez, Gisela Butera, Brooke Betsuie, Marci E Gluck
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Assessment of Unpredictability and Disordered Eating.","authors":"Tomás Cabeza de Baca, Hannah T Fry, Andrés M Treviño-Alvarez, Gisela Butera, Brooke Betsuie, Marci E Gluck","doi":"10.1111/obr.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceived unpredictability, whether it relates to experiences, food availability, or belief systems, may predict disordered eating behaviors and affect weight gain and future health. Past studies investigating the associations of unpredictability and disordered eating, however, have shown inconsistent findings. The current review aimed to examine the associations between measures of unpredictability and subjective and objective measures of disordered eating behaviors in adults and children. A systematic review was conducted in July 2023, searching six databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science: Core Collection, PsycInfo, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, where 20 relevant research articles were identified. Eighty-three correlation coefficients were extracted from 15 articles (n = 9983). Results from a four-level random effects meta-analysis found a small, but significant association between unpredictability and disordered eating (r = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08, 0.17, p < 0.0001), with a significant (Q [82] = 461.55, p < 0.0001) and large degree of heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 86.72%). Country of origin, mode of measurement for disordered eating, chronicity of unpredictability, and study percentage of women were identified as significant moderators. These findings highlight the need for assessment of unpredictability with more rigorous and improved measures of disordered eating to understand the impact on health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Perceived unpredictability, whether it relates to experiences, food availability, or belief systems, may predict disordered eating behaviors and affect weight gain and future health. Past studies investigating the associations of unpredictability and disordered eating, however, have shown inconsistent findings. The current review aimed to examine the associations between measures of unpredictability and subjective and objective measures of disordered eating behaviors in adults and children. A systematic review was conducted in July 2023, searching six databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science: Core Collection, PsycInfo, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, where 20 relevant research articles were identified. Eighty-three correlation coefficients were extracted from 15 articles (n = 9983). Results from a four-level random effects meta-analysis found a small, but significant association between unpredictability and disordered eating (r = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08, 0.17, p < 0.0001), with a significant (Q [82] = 461.55, p < 0.0001) and large degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 86.72%). Country of origin, mode of measurement for disordered eating, chronicity of unpredictability, and study percentage of women were identified as significant moderators. These findings highlight the need for assessment of unpredictability with more rigorous and improved measures of disordered eating to understand the impact on health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.