Identifying Social Media-Based Interactions That Help Adults to Adhere to Weight Loss Goals: A Systematic Review.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1111/obr.70030
Constanze Betz, Mirna Al Masri, Laura M König, Tina Bartelmeß
{"title":"Identifying Social Media-Based Interactions That Help Adults to Adhere to Weight Loss Goals: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Constanze Betz, Mirna Al Masri, Laura M König, Tina Bartelmeß","doi":"10.1111/obr.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media may support weight loss through online interaction and support, but its impact on interactions, social support, psychological factors, and weight loss outcomes across socioeconomic groups is unclear. This review aimed to (1) identify social support mechanisms aiding weight loss on social media, (2) pinpoint effective platforms and functions, and (3) assess intervention effectiveness across diverse demographics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted through mid-2023. Studies included targeted adults without psychiatric disorders and linked social media use to outcomes like weight, diet, physical activity, self-management, or social support. Studies not meeting these criteria were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 61 studies, informational support was most common (83%), followed by esteem (52%), network (47%), and emotional support (44%). Tangible support was rare due to the need for physical proximity. Informational and esteem support showed positive effects, but challenges like social comparison and negative group dynamics were noted. Facebook was the most studied platform, with higher engagement linked to better outcomes. Factors such as network embeddedness, tailored support, and platform familiarity influenced effectiveness. Only 18 studies addressed social inequality, showing younger individuals and women benefit more from these interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media facilitates weight loss through diverse support mechanisms, but challenges like varied platform preferences and social inequality require attention. Tailored interventions and strategies to promote engagement and mitigate negative dynamics are critical for maximizing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70030"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media may support weight loss through online interaction and support, but its impact on interactions, social support, psychological factors, and weight loss outcomes across socioeconomic groups is unclear. This review aimed to (1) identify social support mechanisms aiding weight loss on social media, (2) pinpoint effective platforms and functions, and (3) assess intervention effectiveness across diverse demographics.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted through mid-2023. Studies included targeted adults without psychiatric disorders and linked social media use to outcomes like weight, diet, physical activity, self-management, or social support. Studies not meeting these criteria were excluded.

Results: From 61 studies, informational support was most common (83%), followed by esteem (52%), network (47%), and emotional support (44%). Tangible support was rare due to the need for physical proximity. Informational and esteem support showed positive effects, but challenges like social comparison and negative group dynamics were noted. Facebook was the most studied platform, with higher engagement linked to better outcomes. Factors such as network embeddedness, tailored support, and platform familiarity influenced effectiveness. Only 18 studies addressed social inequality, showing younger individuals and women benefit more from these interventions.

Conclusions: Social media facilitates weight loss through diverse support mechanisms, but challenges like varied platform preferences and social inequality require attention. Tailored interventions and strategies to promote engagement and mitigate negative dynamics are critical for maximizing outcomes.

识别基于社交媒体的互动,帮助成年人坚持减肥目标:系统回顾。
背景:社交媒体可能通过在线互动和支持来支持减肥,但其对社会经济群体的互动、社会支持、心理因素和减肥结果的影响尚不清楚。本综述旨在(1)确定社交媒体上帮助减肥的社会支持机制,(2)确定有效的平台和功能,以及(3)评估不同人群的干预效果。方法:到2023年中期,对PubMed、PsycINFO和Web of Science进行综合检索。研究对象包括没有精神疾病的成年人,并将社交媒体的使用与体重、饮食、身体活动、自我管理或社会支持等结果联系起来。不符合这些标准的研究被排除在外。结果:在61项研究中,信息支持最常见(83%),其次是尊重(52%),网络(47%)和情感支持(44%)。由于需要物理上的接近,有形的支持很少。信息支持和尊重支持显示出积极效果,但也注意到社会比较和消极群体动力等挑战。Facebook是研究最多的平台,参与度越高,结果越好。诸如网络嵌入性、量身定制的支持和平台熟悉度等因素都会影响有效性。只有18项研究涉及社会不平等问题,表明年轻人和女性从这些干预措施中受益更多。结论:社交媒体通过多种支持机制促进减肥,但平台偏好不同、社会不平等等挑战需要关注。量身定制的干预措施和战略,以促进参与和减轻负面动态,对于最大限度地提高成果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信