Effect of percutaneous release versus steroid injection among adults with trigger fingers: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mandeep Karki, Rachit Sharma, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Rama Shankar Gupta, Devendra Raj Singh, Sunima Lama, Kailash Kumar Bhandari, Ram Krishna Tamang, Narendra Kumar Chaudhary
{"title":"Effect of percutaneous release versus steroid injection among adults with trigger fingers: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Mandeep Karki, Rachit Sharma, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Rama Shankar Gupta, Devendra Raj Singh, Sunima Lama, Kailash Kumar Bhandari, Ram Krishna Tamang, Narendra Kumar Chaudhary","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08981-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trigger finger (TF) causes pain and impaired hand function. Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley demonstrates a better outcome than steroid injection in the treatment of TF; however, evidence remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous release of the A1 pulley compared to local steroid injection in the treatment of trigger fingers in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hospital-based randomized clinical trial among 92 patients aged 18 years and above suffering from trigger fingers that were unresponsive to conservative treatment was conducted to evaluate the effect of the percutaneous release of A1 pulley and steroid injection. Quinnell's classification, visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring system and thickness of A1 pulley, as well as the flexor tendon in the affected site, were assessed before and after intervention at six months. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square tests were performed to compare the effectiveness of both treatments.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley showed better functional improvement than steroid injection, with a p-value of < 0.001 and medium effect size of 0.43. The pain score was also decreased more in the percutaneous release group than the steroid group (-5.1 ± 1.4 versus - 3.7 ± 1.8), with the group difference of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.6 to 2.0), with a p-value of < 0.001 and a large effect size of 0.87. Nevertheless, steroid injection decreased the thickness of A1 pulley than percutaneous release (-0.34 ± 0.24 versus - 0.21 ± 0.21), with a p-value of 0.011 and a large effect size of 0.5. Furthermore, tendon thickness was decreased more in the steroid group compared with the percutaneous release group (-1.12 ± 0.73 versus - 0.34 ± 0.41), with a p-value of < 0.001 and a huge effect size of 1.31.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous release of A1 pulley illustrated greater improvement in functional mobility with a moderate effect size and pain with a large effect size compared to steroid injection in trigger fingers. A multicenter trial with a larger sample size and involving a diverse participant cohort may enhance the strength of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05383040, first registered on 17/05/2022 (https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05383040).</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08981-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trigger finger (TF) causes pain and impaired hand function. Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley demonstrates a better outcome than steroid injection in the treatment of TF; however, evidence remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous release of the A1 pulley compared to local steroid injection in the treatment of trigger fingers in Nepal.

Methods: A hospital-based randomized clinical trial among 92 patients aged 18 years and above suffering from trigger fingers that were unresponsive to conservative treatment was conducted to evaluate the effect of the percutaneous release of A1 pulley and steroid injection. Quinnell's classification, visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring system and thickness of A1 pulley, as well as the flexor tendon in the affected site, were assessed before and after intervention at six months. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square tests were performed to compare the effectiveness of both treatments.

Result: Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley showed better functional improvement than steroid injection, with a p-value of < 0.001 and medium effect size of 0.43. The pain score was also decreased more in the percutaneous release group than the steroid group (-5.1 ± 1.4 versus - 3.7 ± 1.8), with the group difference of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.6 to 2.0), with a p-value of < 0.001 and a large effect size of 0.87. Nevertheless, steroid injection decreased the thickness of A1 pulley than percutaneous release (-0.34 ± 0.24 versus - 0.21 ± 0.21), with a p-value of 0.011 and a large effect size of 0.5. Furthermore, tendon thickness was decreased more in the steroid group compared with the percutaneous release group (-1.12 ± 0.73 versus - 0.34 ± 0.41), with a p-value of < 0.001 and a huge effect size of 1.31.

Conclusion: Percutaneous release of A1 pulley illustrated greater improvement in functional mobility with a moderate effect size and pain with a large effect size compared to steroid injection in trigger fingers. A multicenter trial with a larger sample size and involving a diverse participant cohort may enhance the strength of the evidence.

Trial registration: NCT05383040, first registered on 17/05/2022 (https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05383040).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮释放与类固醇注射对成人扳机指的影响:一项随机临床试验。
背景:扳机指(TF)引起疼痛和手部功能受损。经皮释放A1滑轮比注射类固醇治疗TF效果更好;然而,证据仍然有限。因此,本研究旨在比较经皮释放A1滑轮与局部类固醇注射在尼泊尔治疗扳机指的效果。方法:对92例18岁及以上的扳机指保守治疗无效的患者进行医院随机临床试验,评价经皮释放A1皮带轮和类固醇注射的效果。在干预前后6个月评估Quinnell分级、视觉模拟评分系统(VAS)和A1滑轮的厚度以及受累部位屈肌腱。采用学生t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验比较两种治疗的疗效。结果:经皮释放A1滑轮比类固醇注射更能改善功能,p值为。结论:与类固醇注射相比,经皮释放A1滑轮对触发指的功能活动能力有更大的改善,效果大小适中,疼痛效果大。大样本量的多中心试验和涉及不同参与者的队列可以增强证据的强度。试验注册:NCT05383040,首次注册时间为2022年5月17日(https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05383040)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信