Multicriteria Evaluation of Green Infrastructure for Public Spaces in Urban Areas: Hydrological Functionality and Ecosystem Services.

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jony Alveiro Arteaga-Zambrano, Omar S Areu-Rangel, Jerson Esteban Rosero-Moran, Liliana Lizárraga-Mendiola
{"title":"Multicriteria Evaluation of Green Infrastructure for Public Spaces in Urban Areas: Hydrological Functionality and Ecosystem Services.","authors":"Jony Alveiro Arteaga-Zambrano, Omar S Areu-Rangel, Jerson Esteban Rosero-Moran, Liliana Lizárraga-Mendiola","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02287-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study proposes an innovative methodology for evaluating and selecting green infrastructure (GI) in urban areas with semi-arid conditions, employing an adapted version of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This systematic approach facilitates the classification of various types of GI based on their capacity to manage water and provide ecosystem services (ES) tailored to specific environmental characteristics. The effectiveness of alternatives such as infiltrative gardens, infiltration trenches, and wetlands, among others, is analyzed to address critical challenges like water scarcity and flooding while ensuring their long-term viability through environmental and social benefits. The study emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach that considers both technical aspects and the social and cultural perceptions of communities, ensuring that implemented solutions are both accepted and effective. Adapting the AHP methodology to the specific characteristics of semi-arid climates establishes a framework that can be applied to other regions with similar conditions, thereby contributing to the development of resilient and sustainable cities on a global scale. The applicability of the methodology fosters a sense of connection and shared purpose among urban planners, environmental engineers, and policymakers worldwide. Moreover, the importance of promoting community participation in the design of GI is highlighted to enhance social equity and optimize the use of natural resources, ensuring the effective integration of GI in urban planning at a global scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02287-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes an innovative methodology for evaluating and selecting green infrastructure (GI) in urban areas with semi-arid conditions, employing an adapted version of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This systematic approach facilitates the classification of various types of GI based on their capacity to manage water and provide ecosystem services (ES) tailored to specific environmental characteristics. The effectiveness of alternatives such as infiltrative gardens, infiltration trenches, and wetlands, among others, is analyzed to address critical challenges like water scarcity and flooding while ensuring their long-term viability through environmental and social benefits. The study emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach that considers both technical aspects and the social and cultural perceptions of communities, ensuring that implemented solutions are both accepted and effective. Adapting the AHP methodology to the specific characteristics of semi-arid climates establishes a framework that can be applied to other regions with similar conditions, thereby contributing to the development of resilient and sustainable cities on a global scale. The applicability of the methodology fosters a sense of connection and shared purpose among urban planners, environmental engineers, and policymakers worldwide. Moreover, the importance of promoting community participation in the design of GI is highlighted to enhance social equity and optimize the use of natural resources, ensuring the effective integration of GI in urban planning at a global scale.

城市公共空间绿色基础设施的多标准评价:水文功能和生态系统服务。
本研究提出了一种创新的方法来评估和选择半干旱条件下城市地区的绿色基础设施(GI),采用了改进的层次分析法(AHP)。这种系统的方法有助于根据各种地理标志管理水和提供适合特定环境特征的生态系统服务(ES)的能力对其进行分类。分析了诸如渗透花园、渗透沟渠和湿地等替代方案的有效性,以解决水资源短缺和洪水等关键挑战,同时通过环境和社会效益确保其长期可行性。该研究强调了综合方法的重要性,该方法既考虑到技术方面,也考虑到社区的社会和文化观念,确保实施的解决方案既被接受又有效。使AHP方法适应半干旱气候的具体特征,建立了一个框架,可以应用于具有类似条件的其他地区,从而有助于在全球范围内发展有弹性和可持续的城市。该方法的适用性在世界各地的城市规划者、环境工程师和政策制定者之间培养了一种联系感和共同目标。此外,强调了促进社区参与地理标志设计的重要性,以促进社会公平和优化自然资源的利用,确保全球范围内地理标志在城市规划中的有效整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信