Analysis of the Clinical Value of Monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein in Sepsis

iLABMED Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1002/ila2.70023
Jingxiao Dong, Yushan Luo, Xiuying Zhao, Runqing Li, Kai Tong
{"title":"Analysis of the Clinical Value of Monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein in Sepsis","authors":"Jingxiao Dong,&nbsp;Yushan Luo,&nbsp;Xiuying Zhao,&nbsp;Runqing Li,&nbsp;Kai Tong","doi":"10.1002/ila2.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, leading to organ dysfunction. Early diagnosis and accurate prognosis are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are widely used but have limitations in sensitivity and specificity. Monocytic human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR) has emerged as a promising immunological marker reflecting immune status and severity in sepsis patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical value of mHLA-DR, PCT, and CRP in diagnosing and predicting sepsis outcomes, providing better guidance for clinical management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 sepsis patients and 86 non-sepsis patients admitted to the ICU of our hospital between August 2018 and July 2023. Sepsis patients with clear prognostic outcomes were divided into a survival (24 cases) and death groups (41 cases). Flow cytometry was used to detect mHLA-DR expression, while serum PCT and CRP levels were measured using an automated biochemical immunoassay analyzer. Differences in these indicators were compared between the sepsis and non-sepsis groups as well as between the survival and death groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to analyze the diagnostic and prognostic values of these markers in sepsis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mHLA-DR, PCT, and CRP levels were significantly higher in the sepsis group compared with the non-sepsis group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for diagnosing sepsis were 0.780 for mHLA-DR, 0.837 for PCT, and 0.839 for CRP, with optimal diagnostic cutoff values of 49.46%, 1.95 ng/mL, and 67.91 mg/L, respectively. The respective sensitivities were 76.7%, 86.7%, and 88.0%, while the respective specificities were 75.9%, 70.9%, and 64.0%. The combined analysis of these three indicators yielded an AUC value of 0.890 with an 86.7% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity. In the sepsis cohort, mHLA-DR expression levels were significantly higher in the survival group compared with the death group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while PCT levels were significantly lower in the survival group (<i>p</i> = 0.045). CRP levels showed no significant difference between the survival and death groups (<i>p</i> = 0.833). The prognostic efficacy of mHLA-DR was significantly superior to that of PCT, with mHLA-DR displaying an AUC value of 0.841, an optimal cutoff value of 30.14%, and an 87.5% sensitivity and 73.2% specificity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The combined application of mHLA-DR, PCT, and CRP could improve the diagnostic accuracy for sepsis. Overall, mHLA-DR is a significant biomarker for assessing immune suppression and prognosis in sepsis patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100656,"journal":{"name":"iLABMED","volume":"3 3","pages":"275-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ila2.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLABMED","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ila2.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, leading to organ dysfunction. Early diagnosis and accurate prognosis are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are widely used but have limitations in sensitivity and specificity. Monocytic human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR) has emerged as a promising immunological marker reflecting immune status and severity in sepsis patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical value of mHLA-DR, PCT, and CRP in diagnosing and predicting sepsis outcomes, providing better guidance for clinical management.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 sepsis patients and 86 non-sepsis patients admitted to the ICU of our hospital between August 2018 and July 2023. Sepsis patients with clear prognostic outcomes were divided into a survival (24 cases) and death groups (41 cases). Flow cytometry was used to detect mHLA-DR expression, while serum PCT and CRP levels were measured using an automated biochemical immunoassay analyzer. Differences in these indicators were compared between the sepsis and non-sepsis groups as well as between the survival and death groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to analyze the diagnostic and prognostic values of these markers in sepsis.

Results

The mHLA-DR, PCT, and CRP levels were significantly higher in the sepsis group compared with the non-sepsis group (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for diagnosing sepsis were 0.780 for mHLA-DR, 0.837 for PCT, and 0.839 for CRP, with optimal diagnostic cutoff values of 49.46%, 1.95 ng/mL, and 67.91 mg/L, respectively. The respective sensitivities were 76.7%, 86.7%, and 88.0%, while the respective specificities were 75.9%, 70.9%, and 64.0%. The combined analysis of these three indicators yielded an AUC value of 0.890 with an 86.7% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity. In the sepsis cohort, mHLA-DR expression levels were significantly higher in the survival group compared with the death group (p < 0.001), while PCT levels were significantly lower in the survival group (p = 0.045). CRP levels showed no significant difference between the survival and death groups (p = 0.833). The prognostic efficacy of mHLA-DR was significantly superior to that of PCT, with mHLA-DR displaying an AUC value of 0.841, an optimal cutoff value of 30.14%, and an 87.5% sensitivity and 73.2% specificity.

Conclusion

The combined application of mHLA-DR, PCT, and CRP could improve the diagnostic accuracy for sepsis. Overall, mHLA-DR is a significant biomarker for assessing immune suppression and prognosis in sepsis patients.

Abstract Image

单核细胞人白细胞抗原dr、降钙素原、c反应蛋白在脓毒症中的临床价值分析
脓毒症是一种危及生命的疾病,由宿主对感染的反应失调引起,导致器官功能障碍。早期诊断和准确预后对改善患者预后至关重要。传统的生物标志物如c反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)被广泛使用,但在敏感性和特异性方面存在局限性。单核细胞人白细胞抗原- dr (mHLA-DR)已成为反映脓毒症患者免疫状态和严重程度的有前途的免疫学标志物。本研究旨在比较mHLA-DR、PCT和CRP在脓毒症预后诊断和预测中的临床价值,为临床管理提供更好的指导。方法回顾性分析2018年8月至2023年7月在我院ICU收治的83例脓毒症患者和86例非脓毒症患者。预后明确的脓毒症患者分为生存组(24例)和死亡组(41例)。流式细胞术检测mHLA-DR表达,全自动生化免疫分析仪检测血清PCT和CRP水平。比较脓毒症组和非脓毒症组以及生存组和死亡组之间这些指标的差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析这些指标在脓毒症中的诊断和预后价值。结果脓毒症组mHLA-DR、PCT、CRP水平明显高于非脓毒症组(p < 0.001)。mHLA-DR诊断脓毒症的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.780,PCT为0.837,CRP为0.839,最佳诊断临界值分别为49.46%、1.95 ng/mL和67.91 mg/L。敏感性分别为76.7%、86.7%、88.0%,特异性分别为75.9%、70.9%、64.0%。3项指标联合分析,AUC值为0.890,敏感性86.7%,特异性75.6%。在脓毒症队列中,生存组的mHLA-DR表达水平显著高于死亡组(p < 0.001),而生存组的PCT表达水平显著低于死亡组(p = 0.045)。CRP水平在生存组和死亡组之间无显著差异(p = 0.833)。mHLA-DR的预后效果明显优于PCT,其AUC值为0.841,最佳截断值为30.14%,敏感性为87.5%,特异性为73.2%。结论mHLA-DR、PCT、CRP联合应用可提高败血症的诊断准确率。总体而言,mHLA-DR是评估脓毒症患者免疫抑制和预后的重要生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信