Precarious workers on the move the migrantisation of Italian healthcare professionals in Germany

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Gennaro Veneziano Labanca , Elena Fontanari , Elisa Sala
{"title":"Precarious workers on the move the migrantisation of Italian healthcare professionals in Germany","authors":"Gennaro Veneziano Labanca ,&nbsp;Elena Fontanari ,&nbsp;Elisa Sala","doi":"10.1080/17450101.2025.2481313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the phenomenon of ‘everyday xenoracism’ experienced by Italian healthcare workers who migrated to Germany following the 2008 financial crisis. Despite being white and from the EU, these workers face a distinct form of discrimination – ‘xenoracism’ – rooted in microaggressions and boundary-making practices at both the workplace and in daily life. The study highlights how this discrimination becomes internalized, leading to a form of self-precarization among Italian healthcare workers. These workers, typically seen as ‘expatriates’ rather than ‘migrants’, undergo a process of deskilling and downgrading within the broader transformation of the global care chain, which contributes to a phenomenon we named ‘care waste’. This precarization is further reinforced by the new form of manpower recruitment implemented in Germany (the <em>Gastarbeit 2.0</em> model), which facilitates mobility but also perpetuates inequalities. The paper argues that intra-EU mobility, especially within the context of post-crisis Europe, does not equate to social mobility and instead reflects deeper structural inequalities tied to geographic and economic disparities. Ultimately, it provides a nuanced understanding of how mobility, discrimination, and precarization intersect in shaping the lives of migrant healthcare workers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51457,"journal":{"name":"Mobilities","volume":"20 5","pages":"Pages 835-852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1745010125000207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of ‘everyday xenoracism’ experienced by Italian healthcare workers who migrated to Germany following the 2008 financial crisis. Despite being white and from the EU, these workers face a distinct form of discrimination – ‘xenoracism’ – rooted in microaggressions and boundary-making practices at both the workplace and in daily life. The study highlights how this discrimination becomes internalized, leading to a form of self-precarization among Italian healthcare workers. These workers, typically seen as ‘expatriates’ rather than ‘migrants’, undergo a process of deskilling and downgrading within the broader transformation of the global care chain, which contributes to a phenomenon we named ‘care waste’. This precarization is further reinforced by the new form of manpower recruitment implemented in Germany (the Gastarbeit 2.0 model), which facilitates mobility but also perpetuates inequalities. The paper argues that intra-EU mobility, especially within the context of post-crisis Europe, does not equate to social mobility and instead reflects deeper structural inequalities tied to geographic and economic disparities. Ultimately, it provides a nuanced understanding of how mobility, discrimination, and precarization intersect in shaping the lives of migrant healthcare workers.
流动的不稳定工人意大利医疗保健专业人员在德国的移民
本文探讨了2008年金融危机后移居德国的意大利医护人员所经历的“日常性冷淡”现象。尽管这些工人是来自欧盟的白人,但他们面临着一种独特的歧视形式——“排外主义”,这种歧视植根于工作场所和日常生活中的微侵犯和划定界限的做法。该研究强调了这种歧视是如何内化的,导致意大利医护人员的一种自我不稳定。这些工人通常被视为“外籍人士”,而不是“移民”,他们在全球护理链的更广泛转型中经历了一个去技能化和降级的过程,这导致了一种我们称之为“护理浪费”的现象。德国实施的新形式的人力招聘(Gastarbeit 2.0模式)进一步加剧了这种不稳定现象,这促进了流动性,但也使不平等现象永久化。本文认为,欧盟内部的流动性,特别是在危机后的欧洲背景下,并不等同于社会流动性,而是反映了与地理和经济差异相关的更深层次的结构性不平等。最后,它提供了一个细致入微的理解流动性,歧视和不稳定如何在塑造流动医疗工作者的生活相交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mobilities
Mobilities Multiple-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Mobilities examines both the large-scale movements of people, objects, capital, and information across the world, as well as more local processes of daily transportation, movement through public and private spaces, and the travel of material things in everyday life. Recent developments in transportation and communications infrastructures, along with new social and cultural practices of mobility, present new challenges for the coordination and governance of mobilities and for the protection of mobility rights and access. This has elicited many new research methods and theories relevant for understanding the connections between diverse mobilities and immobilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信