Gennaro Veneziano Labanca , Elena Fontanari , Elisa Sala
{"title":"Precarious workers on the move the migrantisation of Italian healthcare professionals in Germany","authors":"Gennaro Veneziano Labanca , Elena Fontanari , Elisa Sala","doi":"10.1080/17450101.2025.2481313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the phenomenon of ‘everyday xenoracism’ experienced by Italian healthcare workers who migrated to Germany following the 2008 financial crisis. Despite being white and from the EU, these workers face a distinct form of discrimination – ‘xenoracism’ – rooted in microaggressions and boundary-making practices at both the workplace and in daily life. The study highlights how this discrimination becomes internalized, leading to a form of self-precarization among Italian healthcare workers. These workers, typically seen as ‘expatriates’ rather than ‘migrants’, undergo a process of deskilling and downgrading within the broader transformation of the global care chain, which contributes to a phenomenon we named ‘care waste’. This precarization is further reinforced by the new form of manpower recruitment implemented in Germany (the <em>Gastarbeit 2.0</em> model), which facilitates mobility but also perpetuates inequalities. The paper argues that intra-EU mobility, especially within the context of post-crisis Europe, does not equate to social mobility and instead reflects deeper structural inequalities tied to geographic and economic disparities. Ultimately, it provides a nuanced understanding of how mobility, discrimination, and precarization intersect in shaping the lives of migrant healthcare workers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51457,"journal":{"name":"Mobilities","volume":"20 5","pages":"Pages 835-852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1745010125000207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores the phenomenon of ‘everyday xenoracism’ experienced by Italian healthcare workers who migrated to Germany following the 2008 financial crisis. Despite being white and from the EU, these workers face a distinct form of discrimination – ‘xenoracism’ – rooted in microaggressions and boundary-making practices at both the workplace and in daily life. The study highlights how this discrimination becomes internalized, leading to a form of self-precarization among Italian healthcare workers. These workers, typically seen as ‘expatriates’ rather than ‘migrants’, undergo a process of deskilling and downgrading within the broader transformation of the global care chain, which contributes to a phenomenon we named ‘care waste’. This precarization is further reinforced by the new form of manpower recruitment implemented in Germany (the Gastarbeit 2.0 model), which facilitates mobility but also perpetuates inequalities. The paper argues that intra-EU mobility, especially within the context of post-crisis Europe, does not equate to social mobility and instead reflects deeper structural inequalities tied to geographic and economic disparities. Ultimately, it provides a nuanced understanding of how mobility, discrimination, and precarization intersect in shaping the lives of migrant healthcare workers.
期刊介绍:
Mobilities examines both the large-scale movements of people, objects, capital, and information across the world, as well as more local processes of daily transportation, movement through public and private spaces, and the travel of material things in everyday life. Recent developments in transportation and communications infrastructures, along with new social and cultural practices of mobility, present new challenges for the coordination and governance of mobilities and for the protection of mobility rights and access. This has elicited many new research methods and theories relevant for understanding the connections between diverse mobilities and immobilities.