Rethinking redox electrolyte design: Why diffusion layer ion exchange matters more than surface area

IF 3.6 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, APPLIED
Yuhu Wang, Zhenheng Sun, Tianyu Yang, Jiecai Fu
{"title":"Rethinking redox electrolyte design: Why diffusion layer ion exchange matters more than surface area","authors":"Yuhu Wang, Zhenheng Sun, Tianyu Yang, Jiecai Fu","doi":"10.1063/5.0293346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Redox electrolyte-enhanced aqueous energy storage devices (RE-AESDs) offer a promising route to surpass the energy density of traditional supercapacitors, but their performance is often plagued by parasitic transport phenomena that lead to low efficiency. Conventional design paradigms that focus on maximizing electrode specific surface area (SSA)—a strategy inherited from supercapacitors—are physically insufficient if device operation is governed by diffusion kinetics. Here, we introduce and validate a quantitative physical diagnostic for the parasitic diffusive flux that undermines efficiency in these systems. By investigating the archetypal [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− system with carbon electrodes of vastly different SSAs (>1400-fold variation), we demonstrate that charge capacity is fundamentally decoupled from electrode geometry. Instead, performance is dictated by transport physics within the Nernst diffusion layer. Using multi-potential step measurements, we isolate a non-zero termination current (it) as a direct, quantitative measure of the parasitic flux, a key physical parameter previously discussed only qualitatively. This transport-centric model is further substantiated by power-law analysis of voltammetry data, which confirms diffusion-dominated kinetics (b ≈ 0.5). Finally, we link this quantified parasitic flux to long-term cycling degradation. These findings compel a paradigm shift in the RE-AESD design, from optimizing surface geometry to controlling the fundamental physics of ion transport and mitigating the parasitic fluxes quantified by our diagnostic method.","PeriodicalId":8094,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physics Letters","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0293346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Redox electrolyte-enhanced aqueous energy storage devices (RE-AESDs) offer a promising route to surpass the energy density of traditional supercapacitors, but their performance is often plagued by parasitic transport phenomena that lead to low efficiency. Conventional design paradigms that focus on maximizing electrode specific surface area (SSA)—a strategy inherited from supercapacitors—are physically insufficient if device operation is governed by diffusion kinetics. Here, we introduce and validate a quantitative physical diagnostic for the parasitic diffusive flux that undermines efficiency in these systems. By investigating the archetypal [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− system with carbon electrodes of vastly different SSAs (>1400-fold variation), we demonstrate that charge capacity is fundamentally decoupled from electrode geometry. Instead, performance is dictated by transport physics within the Nernst diffusion layer. Using multi-potential step measurements, we isolate a non-zero termination current (it) as a direct, quantitative measure of the parasitic flux, a key physical parameter previously discussed only qualitatively. This transport-centric model is further substantiated by power-law analysis of voltammetry data, which confirms diffusion-dominated kinetics (b ≈ 0.5). Finally, we link this quantified parasitic flux to long-term cycling degradation. These findings compel a paradigm shift in the RE-AESD design, from optimizing surface geometry to controlling the fundamental physics of ion transport and mitigating the parasitic fluxes quantified by our diagnostic method.
重新思考氧化还原电解质设计:为什么扩散层离子交换比表面积更重要
氧化还原电解质增强水性储能装置(re - aesd)为超越传统超级电容器的能量密度提供了一条有前途的途径,但其性能经常受到寄生输运现象的影响,导致效率低下。传统的设计范式侧重于最大化电极比表面积(SSA) -一种继承自超级电容器的策略-如果设备操作受扩散动力学控制,则在物理上是不够的。在这里,我们引入并验证了一种定量的物理诊断方法,用于寄生扩散通量,这种通量会破坏这些系统的效率。通过研究原型[Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3−体系,其碳电极的ssa差异很大(相差1400倍),我们证明了电荷容量从根本上与电极几何解耦。相反,性能是由能量扩散层内的输运物理决定的。利用多电位阶跃测量,我们分离出非零终止电流(it)作为寄生磁通的直接定量测量,寄生磁通是以前仅定性讨论过的关键物理参数。伏安数据的幂律分析进一步证实了这种以输运为中心的模型,证实了扩散主导的动力学(b≈0.5)。最后,我们将这种量化的寄生通量与长期循环降解联系起来。这些发现迫使RE-AESD设计的范式转变,从优化表面几何形状到控制离子传输的基本物理和减轻我们的诊断方法量化的寄生通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Physics Letters
Applied Physics Letters 物理-物理:应用
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1821
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Applied Physics Letters (APL) features concise, up-to-date reports on significant new findings in applied physics. Emphasizing rapid dissemination of key data and new physical insights, APL offers prompt publication of new experimental and theoretical papers reporting applications of physics phenomena to all branches of science, engineering, and modern technology. In addition to regular articles, the journal also publishes invited Fast Track, Perspectives, and in-depth Editorials which report on cutting-edge areas in applied physics. APL Perspectives are forward-looking invited letters which highlight recent developments or discoveries. Emphasis is placed on very recent developments, potentially disruptive technologies, open questions and possible solutions. They also include a mini-roadmap detailing where the community should direct efforts in order for the phenomena to be viable for application and the challenges associated with meeting that performance threshold. Perspectives are characterized by personal viewpoints and opinions of recognized experts in the field. Fast Track articles are invited original research articles that report results that are particularly novel and important or provide a significant advancement in an emerging field. Because of the urgency and scientific importance of the work, the peer review process is accelerated. If, during the review process, it becomes apparent that the paper does not meet the Fast Track criterion, it is returned to a normal track.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信