Wan Ting Tay,Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng,Wouter Ouwerkerk,John G F Cleland,Sean P Collins,Christiane E Angermann,Kenneth Dickstein,Ulf Dahlstrom,Anja Schweizer,Achim Obergfell,Kai-Hang Yiu,Mathieu Ghadanfar,Mahmoud Hassanein,Qing-Wen Ren,Wen-Li Gu,Georg Ertl,Sergio V Perrone,Gerasimos Filippatos,Carolyn S P Lam,Jasper Tromp
{"title":"Global patterns of polypharmacy after acute heart failure hospitalization: Prevalence and outcomes from the REPORT-HF registry.","authors":"Wan Ting Tay,Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng,Wouter Ouwerkerk,John G F Cleland,Sean P Collins,Christiane E Angermann,Kenneth Dickstein,Ulf Dahlstrom,Anja Schweizer,Achim Obergfell,Kai-Hang Yiu,Mathieu Ghadanfar,Mahmoud Hassanein,Qing-Wen Ren,Wen-Li Gu,Georg Ertl,Sergio V Perrone,Gerasimos Filippatos,Carolyn S P Lam,Jasper Tromp","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nPolypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of ≥5 medications, is prevalent among older adults with heart failure (HF). While guideline-directed HF medications provide therapeutic benefits, non-HF polypharmacy, particularly involving inappropriate medications, may lead to adverse outcomes. The international REgistry to assess medical Practice with lOngitudinal obseRvation for Treatment of Heart Failure (REPORT-HF), the largest available global acute HF registry, was used to examine the prevalence, clinical correlates, and 1-year outcome associations of non-HF polypharmacy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\r\nMedication counts were classified as no polypharmacy (<5), polypharmacy (5-9), and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10). Potentially harmful medications were identified using the 2016 American Heart Association scientific statement. Multivariable regression models examined correlates of polypharmacy and 1-year mortality. Among 18 030 patients (66 ± 14 years, 39% women), 39% had polypharmacy and 9% had hyper-polypharmacy (63% and 25%, respectively, if including HF medications). Non-HF polypharmacy was more common in older white patients from high-income countries, with preserved ejection fraction and high comorbidity burden. Patients with greater non-HF medication use were less likely to receive guideline-directed HF medications and more likely to take medications that can worsen HF. Crude hazard ratios (HRs) for 1-year mortality were 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.25) for polypharmacy and 1.46 (95% CI 1.31-1.63) for hyper-polypharmacy versus no polypharmacy. After adjustment, hyper-polypharmacy remained associated with increased mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nNon-HF polypharmacy in HF is common worldwide, particularly in high-income regions. Its association with reduced use of guideline-directed HF medications and higher usage of medications causing or worsening HF, as well as elevated 1-year mortality, underscores the importance of addressing polypharmacy in HF.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nClinicalTrials.gov NCT02595814.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIMS
Polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of ≥5 medications, is prevalent among older adults with heart failure (HF). While guideline-directed HF medications provide therapeutic benefits, non-HF polypharmacy, particularly involving inappropriate medications, may lead to adverse outcomes. The international REgistry to assess medical Practice with lOngitudinal obseRvation for Treatment of Heart Failure (REPORT-HF), the largest available global acute HF registry, was used to examine the prevalence, clinical correlates, and 1-year outcome associations of non-HF polypharmacy.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Medication counts were classified as no polypharmacy (<5), polypharmacy (5-9), and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10). Potentially harmful medications were identified using the 2016 American Heart Association scientific statement. Multivariable regression models examined correlates of polypharmacy and 1-year mortality. Among 18 030 patients (66 ± 14 years, 39% women), 39% had polypharmacy and 9% had hyper-polypharmacy (63% and 25%, respectively, if including HF medications). Non-HF polypharmacy was more common in older white patients from high-income countries, with preserved ejection fraction and high comorbidity burden. Patients with greater non-HF medication use were less likely to receive guideline-directed HF medications and more likely to take medications that can worsen HF. Crude hazard ratios (HRs) for 1-year mortality were 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.25) for polypharmacy and 1.46 (95% CI 1.31-1.63) for hyper-polypharmacy versus no polypharmacy. After adjustment, hyper-polypharmacy remained associated with increased mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33).
CONCLUSIONS
Non-HF polypharmacy in HF is common worldwide, particularly in high-income regions. Its association with reduced use of guideline-directed HF medications and higher usage of medications causing or worsening HF, as well as elevated 1-year mortality, underscores the importance of addressing polypharmacy in HF.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02595814.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.