Proteomic aging clocks and the risk of mortality among long-term cancer survivors.

Shuo Wang,Zexi Rao,Anne H Blaes,Josef Coresh,Corinne E Joshu,James S Pankow,Bharat Thyagarajan,Ruth Dubin,Rajat Deo,Seamus P Whelton,Michael J Blaha,Catherine H Marshall,Jerome I Rotter,Peter Ganz,Weihua Guan,Elizabeth A Platz,Anna Prizment
{"title":"Proteomic aging clocks and the risk of mortality among long-term cancer survivors.","authors":"Shuo Wang,Zexi Rao,Anne H Blaes,Josef Coresh,Corinne E Joshu,James S Pankow,Bharat Thyagarajan,Ruth Dubin,Rajat Deo,Seamus P Whelton,Michael J Blaha,Catherine H Marshall,Jerome I Rotter,Peter Ganz,Weihua Guan,Elizabeth A Platz,Anna Prizment","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nTo estimate biological age, we developed a proteomic aging clock in cancer-free participants (CaPAC) and examined its association with mortality in long-term cancer survivors (LTCS, >2 years between cancer diagnosis and blood collection) and cancer-free participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) studies.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nARIC measured 4,712 proteins using SomaScan in plasma samples collected at three visits, including Visit 5 (2011-13) from 806 LTCS and 3,699 cancer-free participants, all aged 66-90. Among 2,466 randomly selected cancer-free participants, we developed CaPAC using elastic net regression. Age acceleration was calculated as residuals from CaPAC regressed on chronological age (CaPACAccel). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for the associations of CaPACAccel with all-cause and cancer mortality in LTCS and all-cause mortality in the remaining cancer-free participants. We replicated the analysis of all-cause mortality in MESA.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn LCTS, CaPACAccel was associated with increased all-cause mortality in both ARIC [HR (95% CI) per 1 SD = 1.42 (1.24-1.62), p < .001] and MESA [1.62 (1.12-2.33), p = .009]. Also, in ARIC, CaPACAccel was associated with all-cause mortality in breast [1.54 (1.05-2.25), p = .028] and colorectal LTCS [1.96 (1.19-3.22), p = .008]. Additionally, CaPACAccel was associated with cancer mortality in LTCS [1.34 (1.09-1.64), p = .005] in ARIC. In MESA, limited sample size precluded us from examining individual cancers and cause-specific mortality. In cancer-free participants, the associations of CaPACAccel with all-cause mortality were similar across studies.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nProteomic aging clocks hold promise as a predictor of all-cause and cancer mortality in LTCS.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND To estimate biological age, we developed a proteomic aging clock in cancer-free participants (CaPAC) and examined its association with mortality in long-term cancer survivors (LTCS, >2 years between cancer diagnosis and blood collection) and cancer-free participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) studies. METHODS ARIC measured 4,712 proteins using SomaScan in plasma samples collected at three visits, including Visit 5 (2011-13) from 806 LTCS and 3,699 cancer-free participants, all aged 66-90. Among 2,466 randomly selected cancer-free participants, we developed CaPAC using elastic net regression. Age acceleration was calculated as residuals from CaPAC regressed on chronological age (CaPACAccel). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for the associations of CaPACAccel with all-cause and cancer mortality in LTCS and all-cause mortality in the remaining cancer-free participants. We replicated the analysis of all-cause mortality in MESA. RESULTS In LCTS, CaPACAccel was associated with increased all-cause mortality in both ARIC [HR (95% CI) per 1 SD = 1.42 (1.24-1.62), p < .001] and MESA [1.62 (1.12-2.33), p = .009]. Also, in ARIC, CaPACAccel was associated with all-cause mortality in breast [1.54 (1.05-2.25), p = .028] and colorectal LTCS [1.96 (1.19-3.22), p = .008]. Additionally, CaPACAccel was associated with cancer mortality in LTCS [1.34 (1.09-1.64), p = .005] in ARIC. In MESA, limited sample size precluded us from examining individual cancers and cause-specific mortality. In cancer-free participants, the associations of CaPACAccel with all-cause mortality were similar across studies. CONCLUSION Proteomic aging clocks hold promise as a predictor of all-cause and cancer mortality in LTCS.
蛋白质组老化时钟和长期癌症幸存者的死亡风险。
背景:为了估计生物年龄,我们在无癌参与者(CaPAC)中开发了一种蛋白质组老化时钟,并在社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)和多种族动脉粥样硬化研究(MESA)中研究了其与长期癌症幸存者(LTCS,癌症诊断和血液采集之间的20年)和无癌参与者的死亡率的关系。方法saric使用SomaScan检测了三次访问收集的血浆样本中的4,712种蛋白质,包括访问5(2011-13),来自806名LTCS和3,699名无癌症参与者,年龄均为66-90岁。在2466名随机选择的无癌参与者中,我们使用弹性网络回归开发了CaPAC。年龄加速计算为CaPAC对实足年龄回归的残差(CaPACAccel)。我们使用多变量Cox比例风险回归来计算CaPACAccel与LTCS患者的全因死亡率和癌症死亡率以及其余无癌症患者的全因死亡率相关的风险比(hr)。我们重复了MESA的全因死亡率分析。结果在LCTS中,CaPACAccel与两种ARIC患者的全因死亡率升高相关[HR (95% CI) / 1 SD = 1.42 (1.24-1.62), p <。[1.62 (1.12-2.33), p = .009]。此外,在ARIC中,CaPACAccel与乳腺全因死亡率相关[1.54 (1.05-2.25),p =。[028]和结直肠LTCS [1.96 (1.19-3.22), p = 0.008]。此外,CaPACAccel与LTCS的癌症死亡率相关[1.34 (1.09-1.64),p =。[05]在ARIC。在MESA中,有限的样本量使我们无法检查个体癌症和病因特异性死亡率。在无癌症的参与者中,CaPACAccel与全因死亡率的关联在研究中是相似的。结论:蛋白质组学衰老时钟有望预测LTCS的全因死亡率和癌症死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信