Bupropion plus Naltrexone for the Treatment of Binge-Eating Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jordana Belgamasco Cavalcanti Marçal, Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral, Maurício Prätzel Ellwanger, Gilmara Peixoto Rister
{"title":"Bupropion plus Naltrexone for the Treatment of Binge-Eating Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jordana Belgamasco Cavalcanti Marçal, Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral, Maurício Prätzel Ellwanger, Gilmara Peixoto Rister","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these agents in BED patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to February 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bupropion-naltrexone to placebo. The primary outcome was binge eating frequency. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), body weight, depression, lipid profile, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using appropriate methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs involving 177 patients were included, with 49% receiving intervention. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in binge eating (MD -1.25; 95% CI -5.61 to 3.11; 0=0.57), BMI (MD -2.24; 95% CI -8.01 to 3.53; p=0.45), depression (MD -0.81; 95% CI -3.48 to 1.87; p=0.55), or total cholesterol (MD -9.98; 95% CI -21.31 to 3.34; p=0.15). A potential benefit was observed in HbA1c levels (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.28 to 0.08; p=0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis found no significant benefit of bupropion-naltrexone over placebo in reducing binge-eating episodes or improving metabolic and psychological outcomes. A possible effect on HbA1c levels warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520767,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these agents in BED patients.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to February 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bupropion-naltrexone to placebo. The primary outcome was binge eating frequency. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), body weight, depression, lipid profile, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using appropriate methods.

Results: Three RCTs involving 177 patients were included, with 49% receiving intervention. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in binge eating (MD -1.25; 95% CI -5.61 to 3.11; 0=0.57), BMI (MD -2.24; 95% CI -8.01 to 3.53; p=0.45), depression (MD -0.81; 95% CI -3.48 to 1.87; p=0.55), or total cholesterol (MD -9.98; 95% CI -21.31 to 3.34; p=0.15). A potential benefit was observed in HbA1c levels (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.28 to 0.08; p=0.26).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found no significant benefit of bupropion-naltrexone over placebo in reducing binge-eating episodes or improving metabolic and psychological outcomes. A possible effect on HbA1c levels warrants further investigation.

安非他酮加纳曲酮治疗暴食症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本荟萃分析旨在评价这些药物在BED患者中的疗效。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库,检索截至2025年2月的比较安非他酮-纳曲酮与安慰剂的随机对照试验(rct)。主要结果是暴食频率。次要结局包括身体质量指数(BMI)、体重、抑郁、血脂和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。采用适当的方法合并平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:纳入3项随机对照试验,共177例患者,其中49%接受干预。在暴饮暴食(MD -1.25; 95% CI -5.61至3.11;0=0.57)、BMI (MD -2.24; 95% CI -8.01至3.53;p=0.45)、抑郁(MD -0.81; 95% CI -3.48至1.87;p=0.55)或总胆固醇(MD -9.98; 95% CI -21.31至3.34;p=0.15)方面,组间无统计学差异。在HbA1c水平上观察到潜在的益处(MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.28至0.08;p=0.26)。结论:本荟萃分析发现,在减少暴食发作或改善代谢和心理结果方面,安非他酮-纳曲酮与安慰剂相比没有显著的益处。对HbA1c水平的可能影响有待进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信