Deliberate Practice to Achieve Mastery of Basic Life Support Skills: Exploring the Potential of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) As a Learning Tool.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2025-10-01
A Motghare, P B Barde, R Kathrotia, M Naithani
{"title":"Deliberate Practice to Achieve Mastery of Basic Life Support Skills: Exploring the Potential of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) As a Learning Tool.","authors":"A Motghare, P B Barde, R Kathrotia, M Naithani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ineffective performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when needed will cause poor clinical outcomes. Hence more focus should be on the improvisation of CPR training. Various methods of teaching have been used in basic life support (BLS) training. This prospective, single-blinded, quasi-experimental study that evaluated an educational intervention at a tertiary teaching hospital from September 2022 to June 2023. In this study, we aimed to highlight the application of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to identify amateur BLS skills and the use of deliberate practice to master that skill. Structured BLS training was provided to 225 participants including nursing staff (n=158), paramedical staff (n=23) and medical students (n=44). A pre-validated OSCE checklist based on the American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was included for skill-based assessment. The pre and post training OSCE scores of participants were compared. The OSCE was used to identify the skills that needed more practice and the aim was to practice until the score was 100.0% as per the OSCE checklist. A pre and post-test questionnaire with questions covering the theoretical aspects of BLS was administered to all participants. Out of 225 enrolled participants, 177 completed all stages of training. Post training OSCE scores statistically improved in all the participant with (n=79) or without prior (n=98) experience of CPR training. Most forgotten step while demonstrating the BLS was calling for help (33.0%). Immediately after training only 65.0% were able to demonstrate the BLS sequence as recommended by AHA (American Heart Association). Median number of OSCE practice sessions to achieve a 100.0% score was 2 (two) for those with prior training and 4 (four) for first-time trainees. Willingness to give CPR in future emergencies increased from 85.0% to 96.0% among participants after training. The OSCE scores pre and post training improved in both novices and previously trained participants. OSCE can be used as a training tool to check and improve knowledge of BLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"34 4","pages":"1270-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ineffective performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when needed will cause poor clinical outcomes. Hence more focus should be on the improvisation of CPR training. Various methods of teaching have been used in basic life support (BLS) training. This prospective, single-blinded, quasi-experimental study that evaluated an educational intervention at a tertiary teaching hospital from September 2022 to June 2023. In this study, we aimed to highlight the application of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to identify amateur BLS skills and the use of deliberate practice to master that skill. Structured BLS training was provided to 225 participants including nursing staff (n=158), paramedical staff (n=23) and medical students (n=44). A pre-validated OSCE checklist based on the American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was included for skill-based assessment. The pre and post training OSCE scores of participants were compared. The OSCE was used to identify the skills that needed more practice and the aim was to practice until the score was 100.0% as per the OSCE checklist. A pre and post-test questionnaire with questions covering the theoretical aspects of BLS was administered to all participants. Out of 225 enrolled participants, 177 completed all stages of training. Post training OSCE scores statistically improved in all the participant with (n=79) or without prior (n=98) experience of CPR training. Most forgotten step while demonstrating the BLS was calling for help (33.0%). Immediately after training only 65.0% were able to demonstrate the BLS sequence as recommended by AHA (American Heart Association). Median number of OSCE practice sessions to achieve a 100.0% score was 2 (two) for those with prior training and 4 (four) for first-time trainees. Willingness to give CPR in future emergencies increased from 85.0% to 96.0% among participants after training. The OSCE scores pre and post training improved in both novices and previously trained participants. OSCE can be used as a training tool to check and improve knowledge of BLS.

刻意练习以掌握基本的生命支持技能:探索客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)作为学习工具的潜力。
心肺复苏(CPR)在需要时执行不力会导致临床结果不佳。因此,应该更多地关注心肺复苏术的即兴训练。在基本生命支持(BLS)培训中使用了各种教学方法。本前瞻性、单盲、准实验研究评估了一家三级教学医院在2022年9月至2023年6月期间的教育干预。在本研究中,我们旨在强调应用客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)来识别业余BLS技能,并使用刻意练习来掌握该技能。对225名参与者进行了结构化的劳工统计局培训,包括护理人员(n=158)、辅助医务人员(n=23)和医学生(n=44)。基于美国心脏协会(AHA) 2020年心肺复苏指南的预验证欧安组织清单被纳入基于技能的评估。比较培训前后参与者的OSCE得分。欧安组织用来确定需要更多练习的技能,目标是按照欧安组织的检查表进行练习,直到得分达到100.0%。所有的参与者在测试前和测试后都填写了一份问卷,其中的问题涵盖了劳工统计局的理论方面。225名参与者中,177人完成了所有阶段的培训。有(n=79)或没有(n=98)心肺复苏术培训经验的所有参与者在培训后的OSCE评分均有统计学提高。在展示劳工统计局时,最被遗忘的步骤是寻求帮助(33.0%)。训练后,只有65.0%的人能够立即展示AHA(美国心脏协会)推荐的BLS序列。达到100.0%分数的欧安组织实践课程的中位数为,先前接受过培训的学员为2(2)次,首次接受培训的学员为4(4)次。培训后,参与者在未来紧急情况下给予心肺复苏的意愿从85.0%增加到96.0%。欧安组织培训前和培训后的得分在新手和以前接受过培训的参与者中都有所提高。欧安组织可以作为检查和提高劳工统计局知识的培训工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信