The Impact of "Death Rattle" on Patients, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.4
Norah Fagan, Michael Connolly, Nessa Keane, Andrew Davies
{"title":"The Impact of \"Death Rattle\" on Patients, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Norah Fagan, Michael Connolly, Nessa Keane, Andrew Davies","doi":"10.1177/10499091251382508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAudible upper airway secretions (\"death rattle\") is a common problem in patients in the last days of life. The objectives of this scoping review was to determine the impact of death rattle on patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals.MethodsThe scoping review used standard methods, and involved searching Medline (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they reported original data on the impact of death rattle on 1 or more of the specified populations. Hand searching was also undertaken to identify further studies.ResultsFourteen original studies were identified: 2 studies focused on patients, 7 on informal caregivers, and 5 on healthcare professionals. The impact of death rattle was somewhat variable, although related distress was common amongst informal carers, and also amongst healthcare professionals. The impact of death rattle on patients was less well described, although there was a consensus that death rattle is not distressing to affected patients (but may be distressing to other patients). Various beliefs were associated with distress amongst informal carers, and these may be amenable to educational interventions about the nature of death rattle.ConclusionDeath rattle is frequently distressing, and strategies need to be developed to mitigate the distress experienced by informal carers, and equally healthcare professionals. Further research is needed to determine the effect on patients experiencing the problem, and also patients witnessing the problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"1376-1384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13675527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251382508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAudible upper airway secretions ("death rattle") is a common problem in patients in the last days of life. The objectives of this scoping review was to determine the impact of death rattle on patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals.MethodsThe scoping review used standard methods, and involved searching Medline (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they reported original data on the impact of death rattle on 1 or more of the specified populations. Hand searching was also undertaken to identify further studies.ResultsFourteen original studies were identified: 2 studies focused on patients, 7 on informal caregivers, and 5 on healthcare professionals. The impact of death rattle was somewhat variable, although related distress was common amongst informal carers, and also amongst healthcare professionals. The impact of death rattle on patients was less well described, although there was a consensus that death rattle is not distressing to affected patients (but may be distressing to other patients). Various beliefs were associated with distress amongst informal carers, and these may be amenable to educational interventions about the nature of death rattle.ConclusionDeath rattle is frequently distressing, and strategies need to be developed to mitigate the distress experienced by informal carers, and equally healthcare professionals. Further research is needed to determine the effect on patients experiencing the problem, and also patients witnessing the problem.

“死亡之声”对病人、非正式护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的影响:一项范围审查。
背景:可听到的上呼吸道分泌物(“死亡之声”)是患者生命最后几天的常见问题。本综述的目的是确定死亡喋喋不休对患者、非正式护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的影响。方法采用标准方法,检索Medline (Ovid)、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo和Cochrane Library。如果研究报告了死亡喋喋不休对一个或多个特定人群影响的原始数据,则纳入研究。还进行了手工检索,以确定进一步的研究。结果确定了14项原始研究:2项研究关注患者,7项研究关注非正式护理人员,5项研究关注医疗保健专业人员。死亡喋喋不休的影响有些不同,尽管相关的痛苦在非正式护理人员和医疗保健专业人员中很常见。死亡喋喋不休对病人的影响没有被很好地描述,尽管有一个共识,死亡喋喋不休对受影响的病人来说并不痛苦(但可能对其他病人来说是痛苦的)。各种各样的信仰与非正式照顾者的痛苦有关,这些可能是对死亡喋喋声本质的教育干预的结果。结论临终遗言往往是令人痛苦的,需要制定策略来减轻非正式护理人员和卫生保健专业人员所经历的痛苦。需要进一步的研究来确定对经历问题的患者以及目睹问题的患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书