Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a pediatric setting at the Charles-de-Gaulle Pediatric University Hospital in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: A comparison of the Schwartz and Pottel methods

IF 0.7
Hamidou Savadogo, Laure Tamini-Toguyéni, Arnaud Tiendrébéogo, Biebo Bihoun, Aimée Tarihidiga, Aïssata Kaboré, Juste Bonzi, Alain Saga Ouermi, Gérard Coulibaly, Diarra Yé
{"title":"Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a pediatric setting at the Charles-de-Gaulle Pediatric University Hospital in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: A comparison of the Schwartz and Pottel methods","authors":"Hamidou Savadogo, Laure Tamini-Toguyéni, Arnaud Tiendrébéogo, Biebo Bihoun, Aimée Tarihidiga, Aïssata Kaboré, Juste Bonzi, Alain Saga Ouermi, Gérard Coulibaly, Diarra Yé","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best indicator of kidney function. In clinical practice, it is most often estimated using equations derived from serum creatinine levels. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of two GFR estimators in a pediatric hospital setting in Ouagadougou.\nThis was a prospective study conducted from October 1, 2018 to April 4, 2019. It included children aged 5 to 15 years hospitalized in the medical pediatrics department of the Charles de-Gaulle Pediatric University Hospital. The gold standard was creatinine clearance calculated from a 24-hour urine collection.\nOne hundred patients were included in the study. The median age was 9 years and the sex ratio was 1.5. The median creatinine clearance was 79.69 mL/min/1.73 m2. The median GFR estimated using the Schwartz-2009 and Pottel formulas were 86.07 and 84.31 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. For 95% of patients, the differences between the GFR estimated by the Schwartz formula and the measured creatinine clearance ranged from -95.55 to 105.52 mL/min/1.73 m2. These differences range from -101.38 to 102.52 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the GFR estimated by the Pottel formula.\nAlthough the Schwartz-2009 and Pottel formulas were developed from populations different from our own, they are suitable for our context. However, the Pottel formula appears to have a certain superiority over the Schwartz formula, with narrower limits of agreement and a lower degree of overestimation of creatinine clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 4","pages":"241-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2025.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best indicator of kidney function. In clinical practice, it is most often estimated using equations derived from serum creatinine levels. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of two GFR estimators in a pediatric hospital setting in Ouagadougou. This was a prospective study conducted from October 1, 2018 to April 4, 2019. It included children aged 5 to 15 years hospitalized in the medical pediatrics department of the Charles de-Gaulle Pediatric University Hospital. The gold standard was creatinine clearance calculated from a 24-hour urine collection. One hundred patients were included in the study. The median age was 9 years and the sex ratio was 1.5. The median creatinine clearance was 79.69 mL/min/1.73 m2. The median GFR estimated using the Schwartz-2009 and Pottel formulas were 86.07 and 84.31 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. For 95% of patients, the differences between the GFR estimated by the Schwartz formula and the measured creatinine clearance ranged from -95.55 to 105.52 mL/min/1.73 m2. These differences range from -101.38 to 102.52 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the GFR estimated by the Pottel formula. Although the Schwartz-2009 and Pottel formulas were developed from populations different from our own, they are suitable for our context. However, the Pottel formula appears to have a certain superiority over the Schwartz formula, with narrower limits of agreement and a lower degree of overestimation of creatinine clearance.

瓦加杜古戴高乐儿科大学医院儿科肾小球滤过率的估计:Schwartz和Pottel方法的比较
肾小球滤过率(Glomerular filtration rate, GFR)是肾功能的最佳指标。在临床实践中,通常使用从血清肌酐水平推导的方程来估计。本研究的目的是评估瓦加杜古儿科医院设置的两种GFR估计器的性能。这是一项于2018年10月1日至2019年4月4日进行的前瞻性研究。其中包括在戴高乐儿科大学医院儿科住院的5至15岁儿童。金标准是24小时尿液收集计算的肌酐清除率。100名患者参与了这项研究。中位年龄为9岁,性别比为1.5。中位肌酐清除率为79.69 mL/min/1.73 m2。使用Schwartz-2009和Pottel公式估计的GFR中位数分别为86.07和84.31 mL/min/1.73 m2。对于95%的患者,Schwartz公式估计的GFR与测定的肌酐清除率之间的差异范围为-95.55至105.52 mL/min/1.73 m2。这些差异范围从-101.38至102.52毫升/分钟/1.73平方米的GFR估计由波特尔公式。尽管Schwartz-2009和Pottel公式是从不同于我们自己的人群中发展出来的,但它们适用于我们的背景。然而,Pottel公式似乎比Schwartz公式有一定的优势,其一致性限制较窄,对肌酐清除率的高估程度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信