Automated peritoneal dialysis with shortened break-in periods in urgent-start scenarios: A retrospective cohort study.

Luis A Bastida-Castro, Jimena Martínez-Cuautle, Maria Juliana Corredor-Nassar, Bruno Eduardo Reyes-Torres, Salma Ivette Alonso-Lobato, Joana Balderas-Juarez, Mauricio A Salinas-Ramirez, Jose L Hernandez-Castillo, Froylan David Martínez-Sánchez
{"title":"Automated peritoneal dialysis with shortened break-in periods in urgent-start scenarios: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Luis A Bastida-Castro, Jimena Martínez-Cuautle, Maria Juliana Corredor-Nassar, Bruno Eduardo Reyes-Torres, Salma Ivette Alonso-Lobato, Joana Balderas-Juarez, Mauricio A Salinas-Ramirez, Jose L Hernandez-Castillo, Froylan David Martínez-Sánchez","doi":"10.5527/wjn.v14.i3.107177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-stage kidney disease is a growing global health burden with many patients requiring urgent kidney replacement therapy. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as a viable alternative to hemodialysis particularly in resource-limited settings. However, concerns remain regarding catheter-related complications associated with early initiation of PD. Automated PD (APD) offers enhanced flexibility and fluid management, but evidence regarding its safety and outcomes in urgent-start scenarios with shortened break-in periods is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcomes and biochemical changes associated with urgent-start APD with a shortened break-in period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center, observational study that included 62 patients with end-stage kidney disease who required urgent-start dialysis, underwent PD catheter placement, and received APD. Patients were stratified based on catheter opening time (< 12 hours <i>vs</i> > 12 hours). Catheter-related complications, biochemical parameters, and dialysis efficacy were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median catheter opening time was 11 h (interquartile range: 8-14 hours). No significant differences in catheter-related complications were observed between groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Catheter dysfunction, migration, leakage, and replacement occurred in 14.5%, 9.7%, 12.9%, and 11.3% of patients, respectively. APD led to significant reductions in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, urea, phosphorus, and potassium (<i>P</i> < 0.05), alongside correction of metabolic acidosis. No cases of peritonitis or hemoperitoneum were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urgent-start APD with shortened break-in appears safe with low complication rates and improved biochemical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94272,"journal":{"name":"World journal of nephrology","volume":"14 3","pages":"107177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v14.i3.107177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-stage kidney disease is a growing global health burden with many patients requiring urgent kidney replacement therapy. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as a viable alternative to hemodialysis particularly in resource-limited settings. However, concerns remain regarding catheter-related complications associated with early initiation of PD. Automated PD (APD) offers enhanced flexibility and fluid management, but evidence regarding its safety and outcomes in urgent-start scenarios with shortened break-in periods is limited.

Aim: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and biochemical changes associated with urgent-start APD with a shortened break-in period.

Methods: This was a single center, observational study that included 62 patients with end-stage kidney disease who required urgent-start dialysis, underwent PD catheter placement, and received APD. Patients were stratified based on catheter opening time (< 12 hours vs > 12 hours). Catheter-related complications, biochemical parameters, and dialysis efficacy were analyzed.

Results: The median catheter opening time was 11 h (interquartile range: 8-14 hours). No significant differences in catheter-related complications were observed between groups (P > 0.05). Catheter dysfunction, migration, leakage, and replacement occurred in 14.5%, 9.7%, 12.9%, and 11.3% of patients, respectively. APD led to significant reductions in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, urea, phosphorus, and potassium (P < 0.05), alongside correction of metabolic acidosis. No cases of peritonitis or hemoperitoneum were observed.

Conclusion: Urgent-start APD with shortened break-in appears safe with low complication rates and improved biochemical outcomes.

自动腹膜透析在紧急启动情况下缩短进入期:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:终末期肾脏疾病是一个日益增长的全球健康负担,许多患者需要紧急肾脏替代治疗。紧急启动腹膜透析(PD)已成为一种可行的替代血液透析,特别是在资源有限的设置。然而,人们仍然关注与早期PD相关的导管相关并发症。自动化PD (APD)提供了更高的灵活性和流体管理能力,但关于其安全性和在紧急启动情况下的效果的证据有限,并且缩短了磨合期。目的:探讨急发性APD伴短磨合期的临床结局及生化变化。方法:这是一项单中心观察性研究,包括62例需要紧急启动透析、放置PD导管和接受APD的终末期肾病患者。根据导管打开时间(< 12小时vs > 12小时)对患者进行分层。分析导管相关并发症、生化指标及透析效果。结果:导管开启时间中位数为11 h(四分位数间距8 ~ 14小时)。两组间导管相关并发症发生率无显著差异(P < 0.05)。14.5%、9.7%、12.9%和11.3%的患者出现导管功能障碍、移位、渗漏和置换。APD导致血清肌酐、尿素氮、尿素、磷、钾显著降低(P < 0.05),代谢性酸中毒得到纠正。无腹膜炎、腹膜出血病例。结论:紧急启动APD缩短介入时间是安全的,并发症发生率低,生化结果改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信