Is Intraoral Radiography an Appropriate Method to Assess the Feasibility of Immediate and Early Implant Placement in the Premaxilla?

IF 1.1
Axelle Ickroth, Marthe Lambrecht, Svetlana Varlamoff, Jan Cosyn
{"title":"Is Intraoral Radiography an Appropriate Method to Assess the Feasibility of Immediate and Early Implant Placement in the Premaxilla?","authors":"Axelle Ickroth, Marthe Lambrecht, Svetlana Varlamoff, Jan Cosyn","doi":"10.11607/prd.7790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the feasibility of immediate (IIP) and early (EIP) implant placement based on retrospectively collected intra-oral radiographic data, and to compare their 'estimated' feasibility to the 'true' feasibility based on optimal virtual implant planning in CBCT software.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 100 patients (59 women, 41 men, all Caucasians) aged between 19 and 81 years old who had been consecutively treated with a single implant in the premaxilla (13-23) in one private periodontal practice were retrospectively collected. Demographic data, diagnostic information and linear measurements were extracted from patient files, CBCTs and intra-oral radiographs. The 'true' feasibility of IIP and EIP was determined on the basis of optimal virtual implant planning in CBCT software and pre-defined selection criteria. The feasibility of both treatment options was estimated based on intra-oral radiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive predictive value and negative predictive value for intra-oral radiography in assessing the feasibility of IIP amounted to 0.70 (95% CI [0.57-0.81]) and 0.70 (95% CI [0.55-0.81]), respectively. Fourteen percent false negatives and 16% false positives were found. False negatives could be explained by significant overestimation of the true root length (0.84mm) and by a buccal position of the tooth in the alveolar process in all cases, masking critical bone for implant anchorage at the palatal aspect of the root. False positives could be explained by significant overestimation of the availability of apical bone (2.57mm) and by significant underestimation of the dimension of an apical lucency (0.85mm). Similar data were found for EIP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra-oral radiography may be considered an appropriate method to assess the feasibility of IIP and EIP in the premaxilla, yet clinicians should be aware of missing information and possible misinterpretations in about one third of the cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the feasibility of immediate (IIP) and early (EIP) implant placement based on retrospectively collected intra-oral radiographic data, and to compare their 'estimated' feasibility to the 'true' feasibility based on optimal virtual implant planning in CBCT software.

Materials and methods: Data from 100 patients (59 women, 41 men, all Caucasians) aged between 19 and 81 years old who had been consecutively treated with a single implant in the premaxilla (13-23) in one private periodontal practice were retrospectively collected. Demographic data, diagnostic information and linear measurements were extracted from patient files, CBCTs and intra-oral radiographs. The 'true' feasibility of IIP and EIP was determined on the basis of optimal virtual implant planning in CBCT software and pre-defined selection criteria. The feasibility of both treatment options was estimated based on intra-oral radiography.

Results: The positive predictive value and negative predictive value for intra-oral radiography in assessing the feasibility of IIP amounted to 0.70 (95% CI [0.57-0.81]) and 0.70 (95% CI [0.55-0.81]), respectively. Fourteen percent false negatives and 16% false positives were found. False negatives could be explained by significant overestimation of the true root length (0.84mm) and by a buccal position of the tooth in the alveolar process in all cases, masking critical bone for implant anchorage at the palatal aspect of the root. False positives could be explained by significant overestimation of the availability of apical bone (2.57mm) and by significant underestimation of the dimension of an apical lucency (0.85mm). Similar data were found for EIP.

Conclusion: Intra-oral radiography may be considered an appropriate method to assess the feasibility of IIP and EIP in the premaxilla, yet clinicians should be aware of missing information and possible misinterpretations in about one third of the cases.

口腔内x线摄影是评估上颌前牙即刻和早期种植可行性的合适方法吗?
目的:根据回顾性收集的口腔内x线片数据,评估即刻(IIP)和早期(EIP)种植体放置的可行性,并将其“估计”可行性与基于CBCT软件中最佳虚拟种植计划的“真实”可行性进行比较。材料和方法:回顾性收集在一家私人牙周诊所连续使用单颗种植体治疗的100例患者(女性59例,男性41例,均为白种人)的资料,年龄在19 ~ 81岁之间。从患者档案、cbct和口内x线片中提取人口统计数据、诊断信息和线性测量。IIP和EIP的“真正”可行性是根据CBCT软件中的最佳虚拟种植计划和预定义的选择标准确定的。两种治疗方案的可行性是根据口腔内x线摄影进行评估的。结果:口腔内x线片评估IIP可行性的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.70 (95% CI[0.57-0.81])和0.70 (95% CI[0.55-0.81])。假阴性14%,假阳性16%。假阴性可以解释为对真实牙根长度(0.84mm)的严重高估,以及所有病例中牙齿在牙槽突中的颊部位置,掩盖了牙根腭侧种植体锚固的关键骨。假阳性可以通过对根尖骨可用性(2.57mm)的显著高估和根尖透光度(0.85mm)的显著低估来解释。EIP也发现了类似的数据。结论:口腔内x线摄影可被认为是评估上颌骨前IIP和EIP可行性的适当方法,但临床医生应注意约三分之一的病例信息缺失和可能的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信