Language-based AI modeling of personality traits and pathology from life narrative interviews.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Joshua R Oltmanns, Ritik Khandelwal, Jerry Ma, Jocelyn Brickman, Tu Do, Rasiq Hussain, Mehak Gupta
{"title":"Language-based AI modeling of personality traits and pathology from life narrative interviews.","authors":"Joshua R Oltmanns, Ritik Khandelwal, Jerry Ma, Jocelyn Brickman, Tu Do, Rasiq Hussain, Mehak Gupta","doi":"10.1037/abn0001047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) hold promise for clarifying personality disorder (PD) models, research methodology, understanding, and clinical treatment. This study models personality and personality pathology using natural language. A representative community sample of <i>N</i> = 1,409 older adults from St. Louis (33% Black, 65% White, and 2% other) completed life narrative interviews lasting on average 20 min. Language from the interviews was then used to train and test language-based personality models on scores from the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised and the Structured Interview for <i>DSM-IV</i> Personality. Criteria measures were used for multimethod construct validation of the language models including self-report measures of physical functioning and depressive symptoms and informant-report measures of personality, general health status, and social functioning. Language models were developed using fine-tuning of the parameters of the RoBERTa language model, BERTopic topic modeling, and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Fine-tuned RoBERTa models predicted personality scores in testing data above <i>r</i> = .40, approaching what is considered a large effect size for convergent validity tests between two self-reports of the same construct. Life narrative language was more readily mapped onto the five-factor model trait domains than onto <i>DSM</i> PD categories, aside from moderate support for borderline pathology. The language-based five-factor model scores were supported by multimethod criteria correlations including informant-report personality scores in the testing data. Findings demonstrate the potential promise of language-based AI to refine conceptual frameworks of PD and provide automatic personality assessment and prediction in research and clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) hold promise for clarifying personality disorder (PD) models, research methodology, understanding, and clinical treatment. This study models personality and personality pathology using natural language. A representative community sample of N = 1,409 older adults from St. Louis (33% Black, 65% White, and 2% other) completed life narrative interviews lasting on average 20 min. Language from the interviews was then used to train and test language-based personality models on scores from the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised and the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. Criteria measures were used for multimethod construct validation of the language models including self-report measures of physical functioning and depressive symptoms and informant-report measures of personality, general health status, and social functioning. Language models were developed using fine-tuning of the parameters of the RoBERTa language model, BERTopic topic modeling, and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Fine-tuned RoBERTa models predicted personality scores in testing data above r = .40, approaching what is considered a large effect size for convergent validity tests between two self-reports of the same construct. Life narrative language was more readily mapped onto the five-factor model trait domains than onto DSM PD categories, aside from moderate support for borderline pathology. The language-based five-factor model scores were supported by multimethod criteria correlations including informant-report personality scores in the testing data. Findings demonstrate the potential promise of language-based AI to refine conceptual frameworks of PD and provide automatic personality assessment and prediction in research and clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

基于语言的人工智能对生活叙事访谈中人格特征和病理的建模。
人工智能(AI)的进步有望澄清人格障碍(PD)模型、研究方法、理解和临床治疗。本研究使用自然语言对人格和人格病理进行建模。来自圣路易斯的代表性社区样本N = 1,409名老年人(33%黑人,65%白人,2%其他)完成了平均持续20分钟的生活叙述访谈。访谈中的语言随后被用于训练和测试基于语言的人格模型,这些模型的得分来自新人格量表修订和DSM-IV人格结构化访谈。标准测量用于语言模型的多方法结构验证,包括身体功能和抑郁症状的自我报告测量以及人格、一般健康状况和社会功能的举报人报告测量。语言模型是通过对RoBERTa语言模型、BERTopic主题建模和语言查询和单词计数的参数进行微调而开发的。经过微调的RoBERTa模型在r = 0.40以上的测试数据中预测人格分数,接近被认为是相同结构的两个自我报告之间的收敛效度测试的大效应量。除了对边缘性病理的适度支持外,生活叙事语言更容易映射到五因素模型特征域,而不是DSM PD类别。基于语言的五因素模型得分得到多方法标准相关性的支持,包括测试数据中的举报人-报告人格得分。研究结果表明,基于语言的人工智能有可能在研究和临床实践中完善PD的概念框架,并提供自动人格评估和预测。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信