A dimensional latent variable model approach to connecting psychopathology and neurocognition hierarchies.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Orly Lipsitz, Michael Carnovale, Anthony C Ruocco
{"title":"A dimensional latent variable model approach to connecting psychopathology and neurocognition hierarchies.","authors":"Orly Lipsitz, Michael Carnovale, Anthony C Ruocco","doi":"10.1037/abn0001041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specific and unique associations between neurocognition and psychopathology dimensions have not been clearly delineated despite the presence of neurocognitive concerns across nearly all psychiatric disorders. This study seeks to identify relationships between broader and narrower latent factors within psychopathology and neurocognition hierarchies. One thousand adults between the ages of 18 and 65 (<i>n</i> = 715 female) with current mental health concerns participated in this online research study and completed questionnaires of dimensional psychopathology and comprehensive neuropsychological testing using measures with previously established latent hierarchical structures. A series of confirmatory and exploratory higher-order, bifactor, and correlated factors models were tested. Hierarchical regressions and structural models were used to test associations between psychopathology and neurocognition dimensions. An exploratory six-factor bifactor model (general psychopathology, harmful substance use, anxiety, detachment, depression, posttraumatic stress) and a confirmatory five-factor model of psychopathology (general psychopathology, internalizing, externalizing, thought, detachment plus method factor) emerged. An exploratory three-factor bifactor model of neurocognition (general neurocognition, executive function, and social cognition) was retained. Hierarchical regressions revealed a significant negative association of general psychopathology with general neurocognition. Detachment was associated with a further decrement in general neurocognition and social cognition. A positive association was found between anxiety and social cognition. Within a structural model between the five-factor bifactor model of psychopathology and three-factor bifactor model of neurocognition, only the association between detachment and general neurocognition remained significant. Higher levels of detachment are most consistently associated with decrements in general neurocognition across different models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Specific and unique associations between neurocognition and psychopathology dimensions have not been clearly delineated despite the presence of neurocognitive concerns across nearly all psychiatric disorders. This study seeks to identify relationships between broader and narrower latent factors within psychopathology and neurocognition hierarchies. One thousand adults between the ages of 18 and 65 (n = 715 female) with current mental health concerns participated in this online research study and completed questionnaires of dimensional psychopathology and comprehensive neuropsychological testing using measures with previously established latent hierarchical structures. A series of confirmatory and exploratory higher-order, bifactor, and correlated factors models were tested. Hierarchical regressions and structural models were used to test associations between psychopathology and neurocognition dimensions. An exploratory six-factor bifactor model (general psychopathology, harmful substance use, anxiety, detachment, depression, posttraumatic stress) and a confirmatory five-factor model of psychopathology (general psychopathology, internalizing, externalizing, thought, detachment plus method factor) emerged. An exploratory three-factor bifactor model of neurocognition (general neurocognition, executive function, and social cognition) was retained. Hierarchical regressions revealed a significant negative association of general psychopathology with general neurocognition. Detachment was associated with a further decrement in general neurocognition and social cognition. A positive association was found between anxiety and social cognition. Within a structural model between the five-factor bifactor model of psychopathology and three-factor bifactor model of neurocognition, only the association between detachment and general neurocognition remained significant. Higher levels of detachment are most consistently associated with decrements in general neurocognition across different models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

连接精神病理学和神经认知层次的维度潜变量模型方法。
尽管几乎所有的精神疾病都存在神经认知问题,但神经认知和精神病理维度之间的特定和独特的联系尚未被清楚地描述。本研究旨在确定精神病理学和神经认知层次中更广泛和更狭窄的潜在因素之间的关系。1000名年龄在18岁至65岁之间、目前有心理健康问题的成年人(n = 715名女性)参加了这项在线研究,并使用先前建立的潜在层次结构的测量方法完成了维度精神病理学问卷和综合神经心理学测试。一系列验证性和探索性的高阶、双因素和相关因素模型进行了测试。层次回归和结构模型被用来检验精神病理和神经认知维度之间的关联。建立了探索性的六因素双因素模型(一般精神病理、有害物质使用、焦虑、超然、抑郁、创伤后应激)和确证性的五因素模型(一般精神病理、内化、外化、思想、超然加方法因素)。保留了探索性的三因素双因素神经认知模型(一般神经认知、执行功能和社会认知)。层次回归显示一般精神病理与一般神经认知显著负相关。脱离与一般神经认知和社会认知的进一步下降有关。焦虑与社会认知呈正相关。在精神病理学的五因素双因素模型和神经认知的三因素双因素模型之间的结构模型中,只有脱离与一般神经认知之间的关联仍然显著。在不同的模型中,较高水平的脱离与一般神经认知能力的下降最为一致。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信