Bridging National and International Midwifery Regulations: A Thematic Analysis of Italian Key Documents, Desk Review, and Normative Mapping.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Martina Barbieri, Andrea Moro, Gianluca Catania, Franco A Carnevale, Giuseppe Aleo, Milko Zanini, Loredana Sasso, Annamaria Bagnasco
{"title":"Bridging National and International Midwifery Regulations: A Thematic Analysis of Italian Key Documents, Desk Review, and Normative Mapping.","authors":"Martina Barbieri, Andrea Moro, Gianluca Catania, Franco A Carnevale, Giuseppe Aleo, Milko Zanini, Loredana Sasso, Annamaria Bagnasco","doi":"10.1177/15271544251374915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the Italian regulatory landscape shaping the delivery of midwifery care and the midwifery profession. The primary objective was to identify and map relevant national and regional regulatory documents. A secondary aim was to compare three core national documents-the Code of Ethics, the Professional Profile, and the Educational Curricula-with the Professional Framework for Midwifery developed by the International Confederation of Midwives (2021). The study is a qualitative, two-phase exploratory design combining deductive thematic analysis and structured policy document review. In Phase I, a deductive thematic analysis was conducted using the ICM framework to assess the thematic alignment between international and national midwifery standards. Phase II involved a structured desk review identifying 141 regulatory documents, which were analyzed and mapped based on scope, origin, and relevance to midwifery care. Phase I findings revealed both thematic convergence and significant gaps, particularly regarding competencies, professional autonomy, midwifery-led care, and the role of professional associations. Phase II results highlighted a fragmented and inconsistent regulatory framework across regions, with a lack of specificity in policies supporting midwifery-led models, especially in sexual and reproductive health. Additionally, linguistic ambiguity in how \"midwifery\" is framed in Italian legal texts limits the profession's visibility and distinctiveness. This study outlines current regulatory complexities and discrepancies, providing a foundation for future policy development that better integrates midwifery within Italy's healthcare system in alignment with international recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":53177,"journal":{"name":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15271544251374915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544251374915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the Italian regulatory landscape shaping the delivery of midwifery care and the midwifery profession. The primary objective was to identify and map relevant national and regional regulatory documents. A secondary aim was to compare three core national documents-the Code of Ethics, the Professional Profile, and the Educational Curricula-with the Professional Framework for Midwifery developed by the International Confederation of Midwives (2021). The study is a qualitative, two-phase exploratory design combining deductive thematic analysis and structured policy document review. In Phase I, a deductive thematic analysis was conducted using the ICM framework to assess the thematic alignment between international and national midwifery standards. Phase II involved a structured desk review identifying 141 regulatory documents, which were analyzed and mapped based on scope, origin, and relevance to midwifery care. Phase I findings revealed both thematic convergence and significant gaps, particularly regarding competencies, professional autonomy, midwifery-led care, and the role of professional associations. Phase II results highlighted a fragmented and inconsistent regulatory framework across regions, with a lack of specificity in policies supporting midwifery-led models, especially in sexual and reproductive health. Additionally, linguistic ambiguity in how "midwifery" is framed in Italian legal texts limits the profession's visibility and distinctiveness. This study outlines current regulatory complexities and discrepancies, providing a foundation for future policy development that better integrates midwifery within Italy's healthcare system in alignment with international recommendations.

衔接国家和国际助产法规:意大利关键文件,案头审查和规范映射的专题分析。
本研究调查了意大利监管景观塑造助产护理和助产专业的交付。主要目标是确定和绘制有关的国家和区域规范性文件。第二个目的是将三个核心国家文件——道德规范、专业简介和教育课程——与国际助产士联合会(2021年)制定的助产专业框架进行比较。本研究是一个定性的、两阶段的探索性设计,结合了演绎主题分析和结构化政策文件审查。在第一阶段,使用ICM框架进行了演绎主题分析,以评估国际和国家助产标准之间的主题一致性。第二阶段涉及结构化的案头审查,确定了141份规范性文件,并根据范围、来源和与助产护理的相关性对其进行了分析和绘制。第一阶段的调查结果揭示了主题趋同和重大差距,特别是在能力、专业自主、助产士主导的护理和专业协会的作用方面。第二阶段的结果突出表明,各区域的监管框架支离破碎且不一致,支持助产士主导模式的政策缺乏特异性,特别是在性健康和生殖健康方面。此外,意大利法律文本中“助产”一词的含混不清,限制了该职业的可见度和独特性。本研究概述了当前监管的复杂性和差异,为未来的政策制定提供了基础,以便更好地将助产纳入意大利医疗保健系统,与国际建议保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that explores the multiple relationships between nursing and health policy. It serves as a major source of data-based study, policy analysis and discussion on timely, relevant policy issues for nurses in a broad variety of roles and settings, and for others outside of nursing who are interested in nursing-related policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信