A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Plaque and Gingivitis Effects of an Entry-Tier Oscillating-Rotating Electric Toothbrush.

Q2 Dentistry
Ralf E Adam, Julie M Grender, Hans Timm, Jimmy Qaqish, C Ram Goyal
{"title":"A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Plaque and Gingivitis Effects of an Entry-Tier Oscillating-Rotating Electric Toothbrush.","authors":"Ralf E Adam, Julie M Grender, Hans Timm, Jimmy Qaqish, C Ram Goyal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate plaque and gingivitis reduction efficacy of an entry-tier oscillating-rotating (OR) electric toothbrush, used in two brushing modes (Daily Clean and Sensitive), as compared to a manual toothbrush.<b>Methods</b> This was a three-treatment, three-period crossover study, assessing plaque with the Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index after a single brushing and after one week of use. Additionally, in the first treatment period only, participants were assessed for gingivitis (Modified Gingival Index; MGI) and bleeding at baseline, week 1 and week 2 while using their assigned product for two weeks. All participants had baseline evidence of gingivitis and plaque.<b>Results:</b> Forty-two participants were randomly assigned to three treatment groups. The OR toothbrush, used in either mode compared with the manual toothbrush, produced statistically significantly greater reductions in the number of bleeding sites at week 1 and week 2 (<i>p</i>≤.001) and in MGI score at week two (<i>p</i>≤.001). By week 1, the bleeding site reduction with the OR toothbrush in either mode was at least twice as great as the manual toothbrush. The OR toothbrush used in Daily Clean mode also achieved statistically significantly greater MGI reduction at week 1 (<i>p</i>=.011). Both OR toothbrush groups showed statistically significantly greater plaque reduction compared with the manual toothbrush group after a single use (whole mouth, lingual, buccal, interproximal, and gingival margin plaque; <i>p</i><.001) and after one week of repeated use (whole mouth, lingual, buccal, and interproximal plaque; <i>p</i>≤.022).<b>Conclusion</b> The entry-tier OR toothbrush provided significantly greater plaque and gingivitis reductions when used in either mode as compared to the manual toothbrush.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"99 5","pages":"6-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate plaque and gingivitis reduction efficacy of an entry-tier oscillating-rotating (OR) electric toothbrush, used in two brushing modes (Daily Clean and Sensitive), as compared to a manual toothbrush.Methods This was a three-treatment, three-period crossover study, assessing plaque with the Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index after a single brushing and after one week of use. Additionally, in the first treatment period only, participants were assessed for gingivitis (Modified Gingival Index; MGI) and bleeding at baseline, week 1 and week 2 while using their assigned product for two weeks. All participants had baseline evidence of gingivitis and plaque.Results: Forty-two participants were randomly assigned to three treatment groups. The OR toothbrush, used in either mode compared with the manual toothbrush, produced statistically significantly greater reductions in the number of bleeding sites at week 1 and week 2 (p≤.001) and in MGI score at week two (p≤.001). By week 1, the bleeding site reduction with the OR toothbrush in either mode was at least twice as great as the manual toothbrush. The OR toothbrush used in Daily Clean mode also achieved statistically significantly greater MGI reduction at week 1 (p=.011). Both OR toothbrush groups showed statistically significantly greater plaque reduction compared with the manual toothbrush group after a single use (whole mouth, lingual, buccal, interproximal, and gingival margin plaque; p<.001) and after one week of repeated use (whole mouth, lingual, buccal, and interproximal plaque; p≤.022).Conclusion The entry-tier OR toothbrush provided significantly greater plaque and gingivitis reductions when used in either mode as compared to the manual toothbrush.

一项评估入门级摆动旋转电动牙刷对牙菌斑和牙龈炎影响的随机临床试验。
本研究的目的是评估在两种刷牙模式(每日清洁和敏感)下使用的入门级振荡旋转(OR)电动牙刷与手动牙刷相比,减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎的效果。方法:这是一项三组治疗、三期交叉研究,在单次刷牙和使用一周后,用Rustogi改良海军斑块指数评估斑块。此外,仅在第一个治疗期,参与者在基线、第1周和第2周使用指定产品时评估牙龈炎(改良牙龈指数;MGI)和出血。所有参与者都有牙龈炎和牙菌斑的基线证据。结果:42名参与者被随机分为三个治疗组。与手动牙刷相比,两种模式下使用的OR牙刷在第1周和第2周的出血部位数量减少(p≤0.001)和第2周的MGI评分减少(p≤0.001)具有统计学意义。到第1周,无论使用哪种模式,使用OR牙刷减少出血部位的效果至少是手动牙刷的两倍。在每日清洁模式下使用的OR牙刷在第1周也取得了统计学上显著的MGI降低(p= 0.011)。与手动牙刷组相比,两组使用一次后菌斑的减少均有统计学意义(全口、舌、颊、近端间和龈缘菌斑减少,pp≤0.022)。结论与手动牙刷相比,入门级OR牙刷在两种使用方式下均能显著减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信