Safety and Efficacy of Vismodegib and Sonidegib in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Cindy M Doyle, Jevan Cevik, Anand Ramakrishnan
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Vismodegib and Sonidegib in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Cindy M Doyle, Jevan Cevik, Anand Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.1002/hed.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent malignancy globally, with 75% occurring in the head and neck. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) may provide a treatment for locally advanced BCC (laBCC) and metastatic BCC (mBCC) of the head and neck.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these treatments specifically in the head and neck region.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted in June 2024 across Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no date limits applied, with search constraints consisting of the English language.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Included were studies involving adults with confirmed laBCC or mBCC of the head and neck treated with either vismodegib or sonidegib, with histological or radiological confirmation. Studies were excluded if they involved concurrent treatments or lacked quantitative measures. After full text review was completed, there were 17 studies for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using two independent observers. Data extraction was performed using a standardized Microsoft Excel Form. Statistical analyses were conducted using meta-analysis software on jamovi using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Main outcome(s) and measure(s): </strong>This study initially aimed to investigate both systemic immunotherapies and targeted therapies, but no articles were identified for systemic immunotherapies for laBCC or mBCC of the head and neck region. Thus, the sole focus of this article became targeted therapies. Primary outcomes assessed were overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), alongside the prevalence of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Seventeen studies involving 522 patients were analyzed, revealing a pooled ORR of 84.2% (95% CI: 77.1-91.3), CR of 33.8%, and PR of 47.7%. Common adverse effects included muscle spasms, dysgeusia, and fatigue, with a discontinuation rate of 13.2% due to adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a high efficacy of vismodegib and sonidegib for treating advanced BCCs in the head and neck region, suggesting a viable option when surgery is not feasible. Further high-quality research is necessary to optimize treatment outcomes for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent malignancy globally, with 75% occurring in the head and neck. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) may provide a treatment for locally advanced BCC (laBCC) and metastatic BCC (mBCC) of the head and neck.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these treatments specifically in the head and neck region.

Data sources: An electronic database search was conducted in June 2024 across Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no date limits applied, with search constraints consisting of the English language.

Study selection: Included were studies involving adults with confirmed laBCC or mBCC of the head and neck treated with either vismodegib or sonidegib, with histological or radiological confirmation. Studies were excluded if they involved concurrent treatments or lacked quantitative measures. After full text review was completed, there were 17 studies for inclusion.

Data extraction and synthesis: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using two independent observers. Data extraction was performed using a standardized Microsoft Excel Form. Statistical analyses were conducted using meta-analysis software on jamovi using a random effects model.

Main outcome(s) and measure(s): This study initially aimed to investigate both systemic immunotherapies and targeted therapies, but no articles were identified for systemic immunotherapies for laBCC or mBCC of the head and neck region. Thus, the sole focus of this article became targeted therapies. Primary outcomes assessed were overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), alongside the prevalence of adverse effects.

Findings: Seventeen studies involving 522 patients were analyzed, revealing a pooled ORR of 84.2% (95% CI: 77.1-91.3), CR of 33.8%, and PR of 47.7%. Common adverse effects included muscle spasms, dysgeusia, and fatigue, with a discontinuation rate of 13.2% due to adverse events.

Conclusions and relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a high efficacy of vismodegib and sonidegib for treating advanced BCCs in the head and neck region, suggesting a viable option when surgery is not feasible. Further high-quality research is necessary to optimize treatment outcomes for this patient population.

Vismodegib和Sonidegib治疗头颈部晚期基底细胞癌的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
重要性:基底细胞癌(BCC)是全球最常见的恶性肿瘤,75%发生在头颈部。刺猬通路抑制剂(HHIs)可能为头颈部局部晚期BCC (laBCC)和转移性BCC (mBCC)提供治疗。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估这些治疗特别是头颈部区域的安全性和有效性。数据来源:电子数据库检索于2024年6月在Embase、MEDLINE、CINAHL和ClinicalTrials.gov上进行。没有应用日期限制,搜索限制由英语组成。研究选择:纳入的研究涉及已确诊的头颈部laBCC或mBCC的成人,用vismodegib或sonidegib治疗,并有组织学或放射学证实。如果研究涉及并发治疗或缺乏定量测量,则排除研究。全文审阅完成后,纳入17项研究。数据提取和综合:本系统评价和荟萃分析按照PRISMA指南进行,由两名独立观察员进行。使用标准化的Microsoft Excel表格进行数据提取。采用meta分析软件对jamovi进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型。主要结果和措施:本研究最初旨在研究全身免疫治疗和靶向治疗,但没有文章确定头颈部laBCC或mBCC的全身免疫治疗。因此,本文的唯一焦点是靶向治疗。评估的主要结局是总缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解(CR)和部分缓解(PR),以及不良反应的发生率。结果:17项涉及522例患者的研究被分析,显示总ORR为84.2% (95% CI: 77.1-91.3), CR为33.8%,PR为47.7%。常见的不良反应包括肌肉痉挛、发音困难和疲劳,因不良事件而停药率为13.2%。结论和相关性:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,vismodegib和sonidegib治疗头颈部晚期bcc的疗效很高,在手术不可行的情况下,这是一种可行的选择。需要进一步的高质量研究来优化该患者群体的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信