Impact of the Transition Council in Type 1 Diabetes: Bridging the Gap to Adult Care.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1111/apa.70324
Erhan Hocaoglu, Hatice Nursoy, Filiz Mercan Saridas, Muge Yasar, Kadircan Karatoprak, Yasemin Denkboy Ongen, Ozen Oz Gul, Canan Ersoy, Erdal Eren, Soner Cander
{"title":"Impact of the Transition Council in Type 1 Diabetes: Bridging the Gap to Adult Care.","authors":"Erhan Hocaoglu, Hatice Nursoy, Filiz Mercan Saridas, Muge Yasar, Kadircan Karatoprak, Yasemin Denkboy Ongen, Ozen Oz Gul, Canan Ersoy, Erdal Eren, Soner Cander","doi":"10.1111/apa.70324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This retrospective study evaluates the impact of the transition council on clinic attendance, glycaemic control and complications in type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Since 2015, monthly multidisciplinary transition meetings (transition councils) have been held involving paediatric and adult endocrinology departments at Bursa Uludag University Hospital, Turkey. The study retrospectively compared outcomes of type 1 diabetes patients who transitioned to adult care via the council versus standard transition. A total of 180 patients (90 in each group) aged at transition 18-21 years (58.9% male) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 6 months post-transition, 84.9% of council patients (exposed group) and 54.1% of the standard care group attended at least one visit (p < 0.001). Regular follow-up during the first year was significantly higher in the exposed group (58.1% vs. 29.7%, p < 0.001); rates were similar between groups in subsequent years. HbA1c levels increased significantly 1 year after transition in the standard care group (p = 0.025), while the exposed group remained stable (p = 0.719). No significant differences were observed in hospitalisation or diabetic ketoacidosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This transition model may improve regular follow-up rates during the challenging first year of transition and help prevent additional deterioration in glycaemic control compared to standard care. Prospective randomised trials could strengthen these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This retrospective study evaluates the impact of the transition council on clinic attendance, glycaemic control and complications in type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Since 2015, monthly multidisciplinary transition meetings (transition councils) have been held involving paediatric and adult endocrinology departments at Bursa Uludag University Hospital, Turkey. The study retrospectively compared outcomes of type 1 diabetes patients who transitioned to adult care via the council versus standard transition. A total of 180 patients (90 in each group) aged at transition 18-21 years (58.9% male) were included.

Results: Within 6 months post-transition, 84.9% of council patients (exposed group) and 54.1% of the standard care group attended at least one visit (p < 0.001). Regular follow-up during the first year was significantly higher in the exposed group (58.1% vs. 29.7%, p < 0.001); rates were similar between groups in subsequent years. HbA1c levels increased significantly 1 year after transition in the standard care group (p = 0.025), while the exposed group remained stable (p = 0.719). No significant differences were observed in hospitalisation or diabetic ketoacidosis.

Conclusion: This transition model may improve regular follow-up rates during the challenging first year of transition and help prevent additional deterioration in glycaemic control compared to standard care. Prospective randomised trials could strengthen these findings.

1型糖尿病过渡委员会的影响:弥合成人护理的差距。
目的:本回顾性研究评估过渡委员会对1型糖尿病患者就诊、血糖控制和并发症的影响。方法:自2015年以来,土耳其Bursa Uludag大学医院每月举行多学科过渡会议(过渡委员会),涉及儿科和成人内分泌科。该研究回顾性比较了通过理事会过渡到成人护理的1型糖尿病患者与标准过渡的结果。共纳入180例(每组90例)18-21岁过渡期患者,其中58.9%为男性。结果:在转换后的6个月内,84.9%的委员会患者(暴露组)和54.1%的标准治疗组至少参加了一次就诊(p结论:与标准治疗相比,这种转换模式可以提高具有挑战性的转换第一年的常规随访率,并有助于防止血糖控制的进一步恶化。前瞻性随机试验可以加强这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信