Bethan Page, Pru Holder, Katie Doidge, Lisa Hinton, Lorna K. Fraser
{"title":"Family Caregivers' Experiences of Services for Children With Medical Complexity: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis","authors":"Bethan Page, Pru Holder, Katie Doidge, Lisa Hinton, Lorna K. Fraser","doi":"10.1111/hex.70452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Many high-income countries are seeking to adapt services to meet the needs of the growing population of children with medical complexity and their families but concerns have been raised about the quality of this care. To understand family caregivers' experiences of services and identify priorities for improvement we need to synthesise research about families' experiences of services for children with medical complexity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically identify and synthesise the qualitative evidence of family caregivers' experiences of health, care and education services for children with medical complexity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ERIC from January 2011 to March 2024. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and data richness and synthesized using thematic synthesis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-one studies met the eligibility criteria. A purposive sample of 29 studies was taken, selecting good-quality papers with rich data. These studies described the experience of 524 family caregivers and focused mostly on hospital care and care in the home. No studies were identified that focused specifically on family caregivers' experiences of education or social care services. Most studies were from the United States and Canada. The overarching theme was ‘concern for child's safety’ with three subthemes: ‘interactions with professionals’, ‘caring for the whole family’ and ‘system organisation’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Family caregivers' priority is maintaining their child's safety across all settings of care. Fragmented systems and difficulties trusting professionals exacerbate parents' stress and concern for their child's safety. To keep the child safe and well, services need to address the needs of the whole family (e.g., parental sleep and mental health, finances, housing). Future research is needed to address the gap in research on social care services and education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Emerging findings of the review were discussed in a 2-h workshop with six parents of children with medical complexity. The parents inputted into the development of the analytical themes and helped to shape the findings of the review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Many high-income countries are seeking to adapt services to meet the needs of the growing population of children with medical complexity and their families but concerns have been raised about the quality of this care. To understand family caregivers' experiences of services and identify priorities for improvement we need to synthesise research about families' experiences of services for children with medical complexity.
Objectives
To systematically identify and synthesise the qualitative evidence of family caregivers' experiences of health, care and education services for children with medical complexity.
Methods
Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ERIC from January 2011 to March 2024. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and data richness and synthesized using thematic synthesis.
Results
Seventy-one studies met the eligibility criteria. A purposive sample of 29 studies was taken, selecting good-quality papers with rich data. These studies described the experience of 524 family caregivers and focused mostly on hospital care and care in the home. No studies were identified that focused specifically on family caregivers' experiences of education or social care services. Most studies were from the United States and Canada. The overarching theme was ‘concern for child's safety’ with three subthemes: ‘interactions with professionals’, ‘caring for the whole family’ and ‘system organisation’.
Conclusions
Family caregivers' priority is maintaining their child's safety across all settings of care. Fragmented systems and difficulties trusting professionals exacerbate parents' stress and concern for their child's safety. To keep the child safe and well, services need to address the needs of the whole family (e.g., parental sleep and mental health, finances, housing). Future research is needed to address the gap in research on social care services and education.
Patient and Public Contribution
Emerging findings of the review were discussed in a 2-h workshop with six parents of children with medical complexity. The parents inputted into the development of the analytical themes and helped to shape the findings of the review.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.