Paolo Abondio , Giuseppe Fanelli , Valentina Baldini , Maria Giulia Bacalini , Siegfried Kasper , Joseph Zohar , Daniel Souery , Stuart Montgomery , Diego Albani , Gianluigi Forloni , Panagiotis Ferentinos , Dan Rujescu , Julien Mendlewicz , Alessandro Serretti , Alessio Maria Monteleone , Luigi Grassi , MNESYS - Mood and Psychosis Sub-ProjecEt (Spoke 5) , Anna Rita Atti , Marco Menchetti , Chiara Fabbri , Diana De Ronchi
{"title":"Polygenic predisposition to transdiagnostic symptom dimensions and treatment outcomes across psychiatric disorders","authors":"Paolo Abondio , Giuseppe Fanelli , Valentina Baldini , Maria Giulia Bacalini , Siegfried Kasper , Joseph Zohar , Daniel Souery , Stuart Montgomery , Diego Albani , Gianluigi Forloni , Panagiotis Ferentinos , Dan Rujescu , Julien Mendlewicz , Alessandro Serretti , Alessio Maria Monteleone , Luigi Grassi , MNESYS - Mood and Psychosis Sub-ProjecEt (Spoke 5) , Anna Rita Atti , Marco Menchetti , Chiara Fabbri , Diana De Ronchi","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mood and psychotic disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SCZ), show overlapping symptoms that challenge diagnostic boundaries and may inform personalised treatments. We examined the contribution of genetic liability to transdiagnostic symptom dimensions in treatment outcomes across disorders using polygenic scores (PGSs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed two MDD cohorts (total <em>N</em> = 2548), one BD cohort (<em>N</em> = 755), and one SCZ cohort (<em>N</em> = 449). Outcomes included treatment resistance, symptomatic remission, and change in functioning defined using cohort-specific data. PGSs for anhedonia, anxiety, sociability, resilience, cognitive and sleep-related traits were computed using SBayesRC. Regressions adjusted for potential confounders were run in each cohort and results meta-analysed with random-effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with leave-one-out and influence diagnostics, and meta-regressions. Multiple testing was controlled using a Bonferroni correction adjusted for the effective number of independent tests (α<sub>adj</sub> = 0.0034).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In meta-analyses, no result survived multiple testing correction. The strongest signal was for the Trail Making Test Part B PGS, indexing worse executive function/processing speed, and non-remission (OR = 1.13, <em>p</em> = 0.012; I<sup>2</sup> = 13 %); modelling diagnosis (mood disorders vs SCZ) reduced heterogeneity to I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %, and leave-one-out excluding SCZ reached statistical significance (OR = 1.17, <em>p</em> = 0.001). Verbal-numerical reasoning PGS, indexing predisposition to higher fluid intelligence, was nominally associated with improved functioning (β = −0.06, <em>p</em> = 0.016), confirmed in leave-one-out excluding BD (β = −0.07, <em>p</em> = 0.0095).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PGSs for cognitive traits showed trait- and diagnosis-specific associations with treatment outcomes. Cross-diagnostic analyses may identify shared genetic influences, but variability in symptom expression across disorders may introduce heterogeneity and reduce the detectability of such effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 111512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584625002660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Mood and psychotic disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SCZ), show overlapping symptoms that challenge diagnostic boundaries and may inform personalised treatments. We examined the contribution of genetic liability to transdiagnostic symptom dimensions in treatment outcomes across disorders using polygenic scores (PGSs).
Methods
We analysed two MDD cohorts (total N = 2548), one BD cohort (N = 755), and one SCZ cohort (N = 449). Outcomes included treatment resistance, symptomatic remission, and change in functioning defined using cohort-specific data. PGSs for anhedonia, anxiety, sociability, resilience, cognitive and sleep-related traits were computed using SBayesRC. Regressions adjusted for potential confounders were run in each cohort and results meta-analysed with random-effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with leave-one-out and influence diagnostics, and meta-regressions. Multiple testing was controlled using a Bonferroni correction adjusted for the effective number of independent tests (αadj = 0.0034).
Results
In meta-analyses, no result survived multiple testing correction. The strongest signal was for the Trail Making Test Part B PGS, indexing worse executive function/processing speed, and non-remission (OR = 1.13, p = 0.012; I2 = 13 %); modelling diagnosis (mood disorders vs SCZ) reduced heterogeneity to I2 = 0 %, and leave-one-out excluding SCZ reached statistical significance (OR = 1.17, p = 0.001). Verbal-numerical reasoning PGS, indexing predisposition to higher fluid intelligence, was nominally associated with improved functioning (β = −0.06, p = 0.016), confirmed in leave-one-out excluding BD (β = −0.07, p = 0.0095).
Conclusion
PGSs for cognitive traits showed trait- and diagnosis-specific associations with treatment outcomes. Cross-diagnostic analyses may identify shared genetic influences, but variability in symptom expression across disorders may introduce heterogeneity and reduce the detectability of such effects.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject.
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.