The combined effects of rTMS and upper extremity robotic therapy for restoring upper extremity function in patients with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jung Eun Lim, Hye-Jin Lee, Duk Youn Cho, Onyoo Kim
{"title":"The combined effects of rTMS and upper extremity robotic therapy for restoring upper extremity function in patients with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jung Eun Lim, Hye-Jin Lee, Duk Youn Cho, Onyoo Kim","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2554019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>Non-invasive neuromodulation may be an effective treatment for stimulating motor and functional recovery of the upper extremities after spinal cord injury (SCI). We aimed to investigate the effects of combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with robotic therapy. We compared upper extremity function in patients who received rTMS and robot therapy to those who received sham rTMS and robot therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty patients with SCI were randomized into two groups: an intervention group (IG) receiving rTMS plus robotic therapy and a control group (CG) receiving sham rTMS with robotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The IG received 15 sessions of combined rTMS and robotic therapy over 5 weeks (3 sessions per week), while the CG received sham rTMS with robotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Functional assessments pre- and post-intervention included the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP), grip strength, pain levels, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and the Korean version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (KSCIM-III).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant post-treatment improvements in GRASSP domains (Strength, Sensation, Quantitative Prehension), with no significant intergroup differences. Grip strength, pain, and MAS scores improved in both groups without significant differences. In KSCIM-III, the IG showed significant gains in feeding and grooming, while the CG significantly improved in wheelchair-to-toilet/tub transfers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that combining rTMS with upper extremity robotic therapy may have potential benefits for upper extremity function in patients with SCI. However, the addition of rTMS did not demonstrate clear superiority over robotic therapy alone. Further research with larger cohorts and optimized protocols is warranted to clarify its therapeutic value.<b>Trial registration:</b> Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea identifier: KCT0004443.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2554019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context/objective: Non-invasive neuromodulation may be an effective treatment for stimulating motor and functional recovery of the upper extremities after spinal cord injury (SCI). We aimed to investigate the effects of combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with robotic therapy. We compared upper extremity function in patients who received rTMS and robot therapy to those who received sham rTMS and robot therapy.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Rehabilitation center.

Participants: Thirty patients with SCI were randomized into two groups: an intervention group (IG) receiving rTMS plus robotic therapy and a control group (CG) receiving sham rTMS with robotic therapy.

Interventions: The IG received 15 sessions of combined rTMS and robotic therapy over 5 weeks (3 sessions per week), while the CG received sham rTMS with robotic therapy.

Outcome measures: Functional assessments pre- and post-intervention included the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP), grip strength, pain levels, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and the Korean version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (KSCIM-III).

Results: Both groups showed significant post-treatment improvements in GRASSP domains (Strength, Sensation, Quantitative Prehension), with no significant intergroup differences. Grip strength, pain, and MAS scores improved in both groups without significant differences. In KSCIM-III, the IG showed significant gains in feeding and grooming, while the CG significantly improved in wheelchair-to-toilet/tub transfers.

Conclusions: This study suggests that combining rTMS with upper extremity robotic therapy may have potential benefits for upper extremity function in patients with SCI. However, the addition of rTMS did not demonstrate clear superiority over robotic therapy alone. Further research with larger cohorts and optimized protocols is warranted to clarify its therapeutic value.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea identifier: KCT0004443.

rTMS联合上肢机器人治疗对脊髓损伤患者上肢功能恢复的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景/目的:无创神经调节可能是刺激脊髓损伤(SCI)后上肢运动和功能恢复的有效治疗方法。我们的目的是研究重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)与机器人治疗相结合的效果。我们比较了接受rTMS和机器人治疗的患者与接受假rTMS和机器人治疗的患者的上肢功能。设计:随机对照试验。环境:康复中心。参与者:30例SCI患者被随机分为两组:干预组(IG)接受rTMS +机器人治疗,对照组(CG)接受假rTMS +机器人治疗。干预措施:IG组在5周内接受15次rTMS和机器人联合治疗(每周3次),而CG组接受假rTMS和机器人治疗。结果测量:干预前和干预后的功能评估包括力量、敏感性和抓握能力分级重新定义评估(GRASSP)、握力、疼痛水平、改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和韩国版脊髓独立性量表III (ksci -III)。结果:两组在强度、感觉、定量把握方面均有显著改善,组间无显著差异。两组握力、疼痛和MAS评分均有改善,但无显著差异。在KSCIM-III中,IG在喂养和梳理方面取得了显著进展,而CG在轮椅到厕所/浴缸的转移方面取得了显著进展。结论:本研究表明,rTMS联合上肢机器人治疗可能对脊髓损伤患者的上肢功能有潜在的益处。然而,rTMS的加入并没有表现出明显优于单独的机器人治疗。进一步的研究需要更大的队列和优化方案来阐明其治疗价值。试验注册:大韩民国临床研究信息服务中心标识符:KCT0004443。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信