Anxiety in Caregivers of Chinese Children Under 3 Years Old with Cleft Lip or Palate.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Yuanling Meng, Meijun Du, Jialu Song, Yixing Liu, Yiting Cai, Haoyang Wu, Jiali Chen, Renjie Yang, Ting Chi, Caixia Gong, Bing Shi, Hanyao Huang, Yong Lu
{"title":"Anxiety in Caregivers of Chinese Children Under 3 Years Old with Cleft Lip or Palate.","authors":"Yuanling Meng, Meijun Du, Jialu Song, Yixing Liu, Yiting Cai, Haoyang Wu, Jiali Chen, Renjie Yang, Ting Chi, Caixia Gong, Bing Shi, Hanyao Huang, Yong Lu","doi":"10.1177/10556656251382838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study compared anxiety between Chinese caregivers of children with non-syndromic cleft lip (CL) or cleft palate (CP) at the time of their first surgery and control group as well as identifying factors associated with caregiver anxiety.DesignRetrospective, observational cohort study.SettingDepartment of Cleft Lip and Palate in West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University.ParticipantsCaregivers of children under 3 years old.Main Outcome MeasuresThe 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7).ResultsCaregivers were mostly married mothers aged 19-35 years in the control (<i>n</i> = 131), CL (<i>n</i> = 132), or CP (<i>n</i> = 147) groups. Mean GAD-7 scores were 4.90 ± 4.53, 3.74 ± 3.95, and 4.82 ± 4.64 for the control, CL, and CP groups, respectively. The only differences were lower anxiety for the CL group compared to controls (<i>P</i> = .028) and to the CP group (<i>P</i> = .038). Most caregivers reported no anxiety (control 50.38%, CL 65.15%, CP 53.74%) or mild anxiety (control 39.69%, CL 27.27%, CP 31.29%). More CL caregivers exhibited no anxiety compared to controls (65.15% vs. 50.38%), while more CP caregivers exhibited moderate anxiety compared to controls (12.24% vs. 3.82%). Higher GAD-7 scores were associated with having fewer children for CL caregivers, and with younger age and lower education for CP caregivers.ConclusionAt the time of first surgery, most Chinese caregivers of children with CL/CP had no to low anxiety. Additional psychosocial support may benefit the 8% to 15% of caregivers of children with a cleft who had moderate or severe anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251382838"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251382838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study compared anxiety between Chinese caregivers of children with non-syndromic cleft lip (CL) or cleft palate (CP) at the time of their first surgery and control group as well as identifying factors associated with caregiver anxiety.DesignRetrospective, observational cohort study.SettingDepartment of Cleft Lip and Palate in West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University.ParticipantsCaregivers of children under 3 years old.Main Outcome MeasuresThe 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7).ResultsCaregivers were mostly married mothers aged 19-35 years in the control (n = 131), CL (n = 132), or CP (n = 147) groups. Mean GAD-7 scores were 4.90 ± 4.53, 3.74 ± 3.95, and 4.82 ± 4.64 for the control, CL, and CP groups, respectively. The only differences were lower anxiety for the CL group compared to controls (P = .028) and to the CP group (P = .038). Most caregivers reported no anxiety (control 50.38%, CL 65.15%, CP 53.74%) or mild anxiety (control 39.69%, CL 27.27%, CP 31.29%). More CL caregivers exhibited no anxiety compared to controls (65.15% vs. 50.38%), while more CP caregivers exhibited moderate anxiety compared to controls (12.24% vs. 3.82%). Higher GAD-7 scores were associated with having fewer children for CL caregivers, and with younger age and lower education for CP caregivers.ConclusionAt the time of first surgery, most Chinese caregivers of children with CL/CP had no to low anxiety. Additional psychosocial support may benefit the 8% to 15% of caregivers of children with a cleft who had moderate or severe anxiety.

中国3岁以下唇腭裂儿童照顾者的焦虑状况
目的比较中国非综合征性唇裂(CL)或腭裂(CP)患儿首次手术时护理者与对照组的焦虑情况,并确定与护理者焦虑相关的因素。设计回顾性、观察性队列研究。四川大学华西口腔医院唇腭裂外科。参与者:3岁以下儿童的照顾者。7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)。结果对照组(n = 131)、CL组(n = 132)、CP组(n = 147)的照顾者多为19 ~ 35岁的已婚母亲。对照组、CL组和CP组的平均GAD-7评分分别为4.90±4.53、3.74±3.95和4.82±4.64。唯一的区别是,与对照组(P = 0.028)和CP组(P = 0.038)相比,CL组的焦虑水平较低。大多数照护者报告无焦虑(对照组50.38%,CL 65.15%, CP 53.74%)或轻度焦虑(对照组39.69%,CL 27.27%, CP 31.29%)。与对照组相比,更多的CL照顾者表现为无焦虑(65.15%对50.38%),而更多的CP照顾者表现为中度焦虑(12.24%对3.82%)。较高的GAD-7分数与CL照顾者子女较少有关,与CP照顾者年龄较小和受教育程度较低有关。结论首次手术时,CL/CP患儿的中国照顾者大多无至低焦虑。额外的社会心理支持可能会使8%至15%患有中度或重度焦虑的唇裂儿童的看护人受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信