Association between Frailty, Locomotive Syndrome, and Participation Frequency in a Long-Term Care Prevention Program among Community-Dwelling Japanese Older Adults: A Sex-Specific Analysis.

IF 3.2 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.4235/agmr.25.0047
Tamaki Hirose, Yohei Sawaya, Masahiro Ishizaka, Naori Hashimoto, Tomohiko Urano
{"title":"Association between Frailty, Locomotive Syndrome, and Participation Frequency in a Long-Term Care Prevention Program among Community-Dwelling Japanese Older Adults: A Sex-Specific Analysis.","authors":"Tamaki Hirose, Yohei Sawaya, Masahiro Ishizaka, Naori Hashimoto, Tomohiko Urano","doi":"10.4235/agmr.25.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To examine the association between participation frequency in the long-term care prevention program and frailty and locomotive syndrome (LS), stratified by sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 486 older adults residing in City A, Tochigi Prefecture, were included in this study. The participants were categorized into three groups based on the frequency of participation in the long-term care prevention program: low participation, medium participation, and high participation groups. Frailty was assessed using the Questionnaire for Medical Checkup of Old-Old (QMCOO), and LS was assessed using the 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-5). Frailty and LS were compared separately for men and women in three groups. Additionally, a binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between non-frailty and participation frequency in men.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 participants (29.0%) were classified as having frailty, and 160 (32.9%) met the criteria for LS. Intergroup comparisons showed significant differences in frailty prevalence, QMCOO Q1, and Q5, and LS total GLFS-5 score and GLFS-5 Q3, Q4, and Q5 in men. In contrast, intergroup item comparisons showed no significant differences in women. High participation was associated with non-frailty in men across all models in the binomial logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For men, a higher frequency of participation in the long-term care prevention program was suggested to be associated not only with frailty but also with components of LS. These findings highlight the importance of promoting social participation among men, maintaining social participation among women, and adopting sex-specific approaches within community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":"29 3","pages":"384-392"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.25.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To examine the association between participation frequency in the long-term care prevention program and frailty and locomotive syndrome (LS), stratified by sex.

Methods: A total of 486 older adults residing in City A, Tochigi Prefecture, were included in this study. The participants were categorized into three groups based on the frequency of participation in the long-term care prevention program: low participation, medium participation, and high participation groups. Frailty was assessed using the Questionnaire for Medical Checkup of Old-Old (QMCOO), and LS was assessed using the 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-5). Frailty and LS were compared separately for men and women in three groups. Additionally, a binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between non-frailty and participation frequency in men.

Results: A total of 141 participants (29.0%) were classified as having frailty, and 160 (32.9%) met the criteria for LS. Intergroup comparisons showed significant differences in frailty prevalence, QMCOO Q1, and Q5, and LS total GLFS-5 score and GLFS-5 Q3, Q4, and Q5 in men. In contrast, intergroup item comparisons showed no significant differences in women. High participation was associated with non-frailty in men across all models in the binomial logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions: For men, a higher frequency of participation in the long-term care prevention program was suggested to be associated not only with frailty but also with components of LS. These findings highlight the importance of promoting social participation among men, maintaining social participation among women, and adopting sex-specific approaches within community settings.

在日本社区居住的老年人中,虚弱、机车综合征和参与长期护理预防计划的频率之间的关系:一项性别特异性分析。
背景:研究按性别分层的长期护理预防计划参与频率与虚弱和运动综合征(LS)之间的关系。方法:选取居住在栃木县A市的486名老年人为研究对象。参与者根据参与长期护理预防计划的频率分为三组:低参与、中等参与和高参与组。采用《老年体格检查问卷》(QMCOO)评估虚弱程度,采用《老年运动功能量表》(GLFS-5)评估LS。分别比较三组男性和女性的虚弱和LS。此外,进行二项逻辑回归分析,以检验男性非虚弱与参与频率之间的关系。结果:141名参与者(29.0%)被归类为虚弱,160名参与者(32.9%)符合LS标准。组间比较显示,男性的衰弱患病率、QMCOO Q1和Q5、LS总GLFS-5评分和GLFS-5 Q3、Q4和Q5存在显著差异。相比之下,组间项目比较在女性中没有显着差异。在二项logistic回归分析中,在所有模型中,高参与度与男性的非虚弱相关。结论:对于男性来说,参与长期护理预防计划的频率较高,不仅与虚弱有关,而且与LS的组成部分有关。这些发现强调了促进男性社会参与、保持女性社会参与以及在社区环境中采用针对不同性别的方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信