{"title":"Factor structure and convergent validity of the Thai version of the Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire.","authors":"K Anuroj, S Wannaiampikul","doi":"10.12809/eaap2515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire among Thai university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire items were derived from prior research on stressors in Thai and Asian university students. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of two psychologists and two psychiatrists through a single discussion. The validated questionnaire assessed the frequency of difficulties over 3 months in the following nine items: health: underlying disease, health: substance addiction, intrafamilial relationship, extrafamilial relationship, academic, achievement, financial, social support, and self-coping. Responses were measured using a five-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 5 (always); higher scores indicated greater extent of perceived stressors. Internal consistency was analysed using Cronbach's alpha and inter-item correlation. Convergence was evaluated using the Thai adaptation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Exploratory factor analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 359 Thai university students were included in the analysis. The Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire had a two-factor structure; factor 1 had loadings from six items (health: substance addiction, intrafamilial relationship, extrafamilial relationship, financial, academic, and achievement) and factor 2 had loadings from two items (social support and self-coping). Correlation between these two factors was weak (<i>r</i> = 0.17), hence the limited internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.60). Convergence analysis showed significant associations between the Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; factor 1 was more strongly associated with anxious and negative affects, whereas factor 2 was more strongly associated with positive affects. Posthoc analysis showed that freshmen reported significantly lower levels of perceived psychosocial stressors compared with seniors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire can be used to assess psychosocial stressors among Thai university students, with potential applications in clinical, administrative, and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":"35 3","pages":"146-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire among Thai university students.
Methods: The Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire items were derived from prior research on stressors in Thai and Asian university students. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of two psychologists and two psychiatrists through a single discussion. The validated questionnaire assessed the frequency of difficulties over 3 months in the following nine items: health: underlying disease, health: substance addiction, intrafamilial relationship, extrafamilial relationship, academic, achievement, financial, social support, and self-coping. Responses were measured using a five-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 5 (always); higher scores indicated greater extent of perceived stressors. Internal consistency was analysed using Cronbach's alpha and inter-item correlation. Convergence was evaluated using the Thai adaptation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Exploratory factor analysis was performed.
Results: In total, 359 Thai university students were included in the analysis. The Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire had a two-factor structure; factor 1 had loadings from six items (health: substance addiction, intrafamilial relationship, extrafamilial relationship, financial, academic, and achievement) and factor 2 had loadings from two items (social support and self-coping). Correlation between these two factors was weak (r = 0.17), hence the limited internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.60). Convergence analysis showed significant associations between the Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; factor 1 was more strongly associated with anxious and negative affects, whereas factor 2 was more strongly associated with positive affects. Posthoc analysis showed that freshmen reported significantly lower levels of perceived psychosocial stressors compared with seniors.
Conclusion: The Perceived Psychosocial Stressor Questionnaire can be used to assess psychosocial stressors among Thai university students, with potential applications in clinical, administrative, and research settings.