Postural Control Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials for Older Adults Balance: A Systematic Scoping Review.

IF 3.2 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.4235/agmr.25.0019
Romain Pichon, Jeremy Enez, Kathryn M Sibley, Benjamin Landre, Karim Jamal
{"title":"Postural Control Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials for Older Adults Balance: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Romain Pichon, Jeremy Enez, Kathryn M Sibley, Benjamin Landre, Karim Jamal","doi":"10.4235/agmr.25.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this work was to identify and characterize the measures employed for assessing postural control in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of balance interventions in older adults with the reference to the Systems Framework for Postural Control. A scoping review was conducted, and RCTs of balance interventions in older adults published from 2013 to March 2023 were considered for inclusion. Two hundred and seventy-one studies were included with a total of 49 different measures used; the Timed Up and Go test being the most commonly employed. The median number of components of postural control assessed per study was five. The most frequently assessed components were motor systems and static stability, while reactive postural control, cognitive influences and verticality were the least frequently assessed. Postural control in RCTs of balance in older adults was assessed using a wide range of measures, but also from the perspective of a limited number of components.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":"29 3","pages":"305-313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.25.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work was to identify and characterize the measures employed for assessing postural control in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of balance interventions in older adults with the reference to the Systems Framework for Postural Control. A scoping review was conducted, and RCTs of balance interventions in older adults published from 2013 to March 2023 were considered for inclusion. Two hundred and seventy-one studies were included with a total of 49 different measures used; the Timed Up and Go test being the most commonly employed. The median number of components of postural control assessed per study was five. The most frequently assessed components were motor systems and static stability, while reactive postural control, cognitive influences and verticality were the least frequently assessed. Postural control in RCTs of balance in older adults was assessed using a wide range of measures, but also from the perspective of a limited number of components.

老年人平衡的随机对照试验中的姿势控制措施:一项系统的范围综述。
本研究的目的是在参考姿势控制系统框架的情况下,确定和描述用于评估老年人平衡干预的随机对照试验(rct)中评估姿势控制的措施。进行了范围审查,并考虑纳入2013年至2023年3月发表的老年人平衡干预的随机对照试验。纳入了271项研究,共使用了49种不同的测量方法;最常用的是“计时起床”测试。每项研究评估的姿势控制成分中位数为5个。最常评估的部分是运动系统和静态稳定性,而反应性姿势控制、认知影响和垂直度是最不常评估的部分。在老年人平衡的随机对照试验中,姿势控制的评估使用了广泛的测量方法,但也从有限数量的组成部分的角度进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信