Association of cachexia with activities of daily living and discharge destinations among inpatients with dysphagia in a convalescent rehabilitation phase; A multi-center cohort study.

IF 3.2 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Shintaro Togashi, Tomoyuki Murakami, Hidetaka Wakabayashi, Akio Shimizu, Shinta Nishioka, Ryo Momosaki
{"title":"Association of cachexia with activities of daily living and discharge destinations among inpatients with dysphagia in a convalescent rehabilitation phase; A multi-center cohort study.","authors":"Shintaro Togashi, Tomoyuki Murakami, Hidetaka Wakabayashi, Akio Shimizu, Shinta Nishioka, Ryo Momosaki","doi":"10.4235/agmr.25.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although a recent study reported an association between cachexia, as defined by the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC), and lower functional recovery at discharge among post-stroke patients capable of oral intake during the convalescent rehabilitation phase, its impact on functional recovery in patients with dysphagia remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between cachexia, according to AWGC criteria, and both functional status and discharge destinations among inpatients with dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study enrolled 198 inpatients with dysphagia from eight convalescent rehabilitation hospitals. Cachexia was defined using the AWGC criteria at baseline. The primary outcome was the total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at discharge, while the secondary outcomes were the Food Intake LEVEL Scale (FILS) score and discharge destinations. We applied generalized linear models to evaluate the association between cachexia and total FIM score at discharge, adjusting for age, sex, baseline FILS score, comorbidities, and use of enteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 198 patients, the median age was 83.0 (interquartile range, 77.0 to 88.0) years; 111 (56.1%) were women, and 33 (16.7%) had cachexia. After adjusting for covariates, cachexia was not significantly associated with total FIM score at discharge (β = 0.03 [95% CI, -0.10 to 0.15], p = 0.66), FILS (β = 0.23 [95% CI, -0.53 to 1.00], p = 0.55), or discharge destinations including discharge to home (β = 0.25 [95% CI, -0.75 to 1.35], p = 0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cachexia, as defined by the AWGC, was not significantly associated with either functional status at discharge or discharge destinations among inpatients with dysphagia undergoing convalescent rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.25.0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although a recent study reported an association between cachexia, as defined by the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC), and lower functional recovery at discharge among post-stroke patients capable of oral intake during the convalescent rehabilitation phase, its impact on functional recovery in patients with dysphagia remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between cachexia, according to AWGC criteria, and both functional status and discharge destinations among inpatients with dysphagia.

Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 198 inpatients with dysphagia from eight convalescent rehabilitation hospitals. Cachexia was defined using the AWGC criteria at baseline. The primary outcome was the total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at discharge, while the secondary outcomes were the Food Intake LEVEL Scale (FILS) score and discharge destinations. We applied generalized linear models to evaluate the association between cachexia and total FIM score at discharge, adjusting for age, sex, baseline FILS score, comorbidities, and use of enteral nutrition.

Results: Of 198 patients, the median age was 83.0 (interquartile range, 77.0 to 88.0) years; 111 (56.1%) were women, and 33 (16.7%) had cachexia. After adjusting for covariates, cachexia was not significantly associated with total FIM score at discharge (β = 0.03 [95% CI, -0.10 to 0.15], p = 0.66), FILS (β = 0.23 [95% CI, -0.53 to 1.00], p = 0.55), or discharge destinations including discharge to home (β = 0.25 [95% CI, -0.75 to 1.35], p = 0.63).

Conclusions: Cachexia, as defined by the AWGC, was not significantly associated with either functional status at discharge or discharge destinations among inpatients with dysphagia undergoing convalescent rehabilitation.

病毒质与康复期住院吞咽困难患者日常生活活动及出院目的地的关系一项多中心队列研究。
背景:尽管最近的一项研究报道了恶病质(亚洲恶病质工作组定义的恶病质)与中风后患者出院时功能恢复较低之间的关联,但其对吞咽困难患者功能恢复的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在根据AWGC标准,评估吞咽困难住院患者恶病质与功能状态和出院目的地之间的关系。方法:本前瞻性队列研究纳入8家康复医院住院的198例吞咽困难患者。在基线时使用AWGC标准定义恶病质。主要结果是出院时的总功能独立性测量(FIM),而次要结果是食物摄入水平量表(FILS)评分和出院目的地。我们应用广义线性模型来评估恶病质与出院时FIM总分之间的关系,调整年龄、性别、基线FILS评分、合并症和肠内营养的使用。结果:198例患者中位年龄为83.0岁(四分位数范围77.0 ~ 88.0);111例(56.1%)为女性,33例(16.7%)为恶病质。调整协变量后,恶病质与出院时FIM总分(β = 0.03 [95% CI, -0.10至0.15],p = 0.66)、FILS (β = 0.23 [95% CI, -0.53至1.00],p = 0.55)或出院目的地(β = 0.25 [95% CI, -0.75至1.35],p = 0.63)无显著相关。结论:根据AWGC定义的恶病质,在接受康复康复的吞咽困难住院患者中,与出院时或出院目的地的功能状态均无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信